MLS Don't Let Beckham and AC Milan use you
Respond by using them. Not just for a transfer fee, but to continue to build the sport within the traditional sports media. The Sun in England is reporting that the fee being discussed is in the 10 Million dollar range, and that's a great start. But MLS needs more than money and short term profits. The Galaxy are supposedly wanting 20 Million US.
Sure that would give LA more Allocation dollars than any team has ever had in MLS, but is that really enough? Is bringing on a few more stars going to get MLS the coverage by ESPN, Sports Illustrated and non-MLS city daily newspapers?
Most certainly not
The key is to add a clause that would require AC Milan to be an MLS All Star Game opponent. This would generate a ton of the drama and hype that editors love. It would also bring Beckahm, Ronaldinho, Dida, Pirlo, Maldini, and Kaka to the USA for a game. Certainly they all wouldn't play, but most would even if half assed. When Chelsea visited they had Drogba, Shevchenko, Ballack, Lampard and others on the club. Not all appeared, but they lost.
And that is part of what I want. I want the top flight Italian club to suffer the humiliation of losing to the MLS players that are supposedly not good enough. This would get MLS a bit more respect, not a lot, but every bit matters. Rio Tinto is hosting 2009's All Star Game, and an opponent isn't yet announced. The stadium wouldn't be big enough to hold the fans, and maybe ABC picks up the match rather than it getting stuck on ESPN 2 or even the Classic.
Second if I'm the LA Galaxy I also want a friendly for every year that Beckham was supposed to have been in LA but is instead in Milan. That gets LA a nice signature match for its season ticket holders to make up for the fact that their star obsessed fans will be missing out on the man that drew them to the game.
Friendly clauses aren't unheard of in the Transfer Game, and MLS should use them in this case to continue to building the sport. SuperClub LA isn't going to grow the game on its own, and I think that MLS is realizing that, especially while LA loses. It will be particularly rough on Bruce Arena, for if this deal happens his allocation dollars won't be worth anything until the half-way point of the season after Buddle and Franklin have lead a faithful charge to the bottom of the table.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
These are some great ideas, Dave. How likely do you think they are to happen?
I agree that MLS should take as much advantage of this situation as possible. I wonder, though, if they would actually be as aggressive as they would need to be for these things to go down.
by Cornchops on Feb 7, 2009 11:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think it is likely. But I liked the idea enough that I emailed Hanauer asking him to pass it on up the chain of the single entity league.
Getting those friendlies would be a publicity coup, and a financial gain for all. Seattle is going to try and face the best in Europe, why shouldn’t LA?
The PPC shouldn’t be a test, but since LA sucked so bad last year they will likely be last in the tourney’s second year.
by Dave Clark on Feb 7, 2009 11:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
$20 million and a couple of friendlies is a nice start, but I’m not sure it’s enough. A Beckham-for-Ronaldinho swap is floating around the internet as something that might make up for losing the league’s biggest draw. I’ve said before that I think the Galaxy have to be realistic about Beckham’s value as a footballer, but the more I think about it, the more I realize LA hold all the cards. If they have the opportunity to push Milan to pony up, they should. It’s not MLS or the Galaxy’s fault that Milan showed their hand by openly stating their desire to keep him.
by Jason Davis on Feb 7, 2009 2:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
But the Galaxy will lose him anyway as soon as the season is over, so that’s why they should likely move now.
by Dave Clark on Feb 7, 2009 2:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
How much of a tranfer fee does the Galaxy get and how much goes to the league? Of the money the Galaxy does get, how much can be used for allocation and how much goes in their pocket or is used to sign a DP.
by TL on Feb 7, 2009 2:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
One more thing. Dave, do you know how much allocation money Seattle has left after Montero and how much estimated room they have left under the cap?
by TL on Feb 7, 2009 2:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dave, do you have specifics of Beckham’s out? Does he have to pay the league to terminate the contract early?
by Jason Davis on Feb 7, 2009 2:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
TL, MLS does not formerly disclose allocation cash, although it usually leaks in the end. From my searching in the past teams tend to get about 20% of the transfer fee. Allocation cash is GOLD in this league as it allows a team to avoid the salary cap and is the only way to reasonably pay a transfer fee.
LA could get millions in allocations, and a DP slot as well. If they make this deal they would be quite a force in the summer transfer window, or next winter. Allocations are usually for 2 years.
Seattle has never disclosed how its allocation dollars were used, although it is very likely they used them on Keller and Montero. Hanauer has said that expansion teams get extra allocation dollars to help build the team. It seems as if the club is likely to have between 250 and 700k left in the cap, assuming 10% raises for the expansion draftees, the lack of Jeff Parke and a balance between contracted and allocation dollars for Montero/Keller.
The MLS Players Union releases contract data several times a year, but won’t until after March 15th at the earliest as that is the 1st roster deadline.
by Dave Clark on Feb 7, 2009 2:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sports Illustrated first reported the Out Clause.
It is a player option. There is no known fee for it. He also has a clause to purchase an MLS team after his original contract is complete.
by Dave Clark on Feb 7, 2009 2:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If it’s not a buyout clause, then MLS screwed up. If it is, then I think the amount of the buyout is fairly crucial: if MLS is going to get, say $10 million from Beckham at the end of the season, why settle for anything less than that now?
by Jason Davis on Feb 7, 2009 3:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Dave,
You answered all my questions except you said LA would have millions to spend in allocation money. Does that mean that if the transfer fee is $18million and they get appr. 20% 3.6 million, that they can use all of that to sign players?
by TL on Feb 7, 2009 3:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the allocation money could be used basically as a cap exempt signing bonus, or as a transfer fee for a player under contract.
by Dave Clark on Feb 7, 2009 4:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Turns out that Beckham could buyout his deal for 25 Million US $.
So it looks like that would be the high point of sale.
Comments from the Galaxy’s Leiweke are telling
Questioning Beckham’s desire
"If David ultimately has a hunger and a desire to come help us make the impact on the pitch that we wanted to make with him — but haven’t done yet — then he’s an important member of this team and our intention is to bring him back."
Reiterating that the Galaxy are in charge
"Milan understand the only way we do this is if the Galaxy benefits.
"If David’s in a position where he wants to finish the season in Milan, and Milan compensate the Galaxy so that we can suffer no damages to our fans or to our team, then we’ll take a look at it. "
The drama continues.
by Dave Clark on Feb 8, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Dave. I guess the only reason for selling him now is that the Galaxy would get to use their portion of the transfer fee as allocation money; I doubt they would be able to do the same with the $25 million from the buyout. Selling him now for anything less than the buyout is terrible business, but who knows how much pressure AEG would put on the league to pull the trigger anyway.
Oh, by the way, check out my site for a fairly ridiculous report by bloomberg.com on a potential “compromise” in the Beckham deal.
by Jason Davis on Feb 8, 2009 8:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Supposedly there is a deadline today on the Beckham deal.
AC Milan has upped the offer to ~15M US$. Which if there are suffecient add-on agreements would be huge for the league and Galaxy.
by Dave Clark on Feb 13, 2009 9:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like you got <a href="http://www.soccerbyives.net/soccer_by_ives/2009/03/deal-to-keep-beckham-at-milan-officially-announced-milan-to-play-galaxy-on-july-19th-at-home-depot-c.html">some</a> of what you wanted.
by Cornchops on Mar 8, 2009 10:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this seemed to be the deal that would make the most sense for all parties. A few less dollars, and no All Star opponent, but still pretty dang good.
by Dave Clark on Mar 8, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









