Quick reax to morning news
by malcontentjake on Dec 2, 2010 9:32 AM PST
Email
Print
I drug my ass out of bed to head down to F.X. McRory's for the "official" event this morning for the FIFA W.C. '10 &'22 host announcements. The crowd was a mix of supporters, fans, downtown business types killing time before work, media people, and Sounders employees. The announcements were met with the usual emotions I'm sure most of you who weren't there had.
there are a couple of things to keep in mind:
-- World Cup games in Seattle were never the slam dunk many of us assumed it would be. It was never a guarantee the USA would win the bid, and it was never a guarantee that if we did Seattle would be a host city.
-- This decision making process for FIFA is a political one, which means logic is not the primary motivating factor. It is more likely driven my emotional and financial factors, and when it comes to "emotion" these people are not fans or supporters, in the sense that we are, and are thus not driven by the same emotional factors.
While I hate to be cynical about this, I could see this coming. While many saw Russia as a shock choice, absent of many other factors it makes sense in terms of the "prove yourself" theorem FIFA has seemingly adopted after many believed South Africa could never pull it off. This holds true for Qatar as well.
I'm tempted to believe that the "fan experience" in Qatar will be, ummm, "less than desirable" but I'm not entirely sure this is something FIFA spent too much time considering.
At the end of the day, what many people will point to is the financial factors. Qatar threw up a lot of shiny stuff that surely lured FIFA types; their sheer willingness to spend gobs of money was simply too much for these people to resist. Similarly, Russia is essentially a plutarchy, and one only need to keep in mind folks like Roman Abramovich if left wondering how they could possibly have won.
I was asked by more than one person this morning how I felt, and I can honestly say I'm not surprised. Like I said I could see this coming, and this is another example of how sometimes it helps to be a cynic and/or pessimist.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A lot could and would have happened between now and 2022
But in my mind, Seattle was in fact a virtual slam-dunk to host matches. Seattle is the new capital of American soccer, and that is not hyperbole. First and Goal and SSFC would have put forth a full-court press to make the stadium and pitch an ideal venue.
it was never a slam dunk
.. and I stand by that statement.
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
by malcontentjake on Dec 2, 2010 11:08 AM PST up reply actions
another note:
as for Russia, think about this:
‘66 England, ’74 West Germany, ’82 Spain, ’90 Italy, ’98 France, ’06 Germany. It’s clear FIFA, in the interest of genuine globalization, feels as though they don’t need to have every other W.C. in Western Europe any more. It will probably be a good long time before they feel the need to go back. Russia won over 3 Western European bids…
Same holds true, to some extent, for Qatar winning… although by my logic above Australia was a SLAM DUNK choice. The game is far more developed here than many of us appreciate…
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
Russia
at least the portion that will be hosting the World Cup, is in Europe. So in that sense it continues the every other WC in Europe tradition.
Not that Russia isn't a Plutocracy
But they’re actually closer to having a more equitable income distribution than the US.
by Matthew on Dec 3, 2010 4:49 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
