Sounders got better than they deserved
I know Saturday's draw feels like a loss. It should, and not just because the Sounders gave up the equalizer in the 94th minute.
I can't blame anyone for feeling as though we should have won that game. Not only did the equalizer come heart-breakingly late, but it was also the product of several bad decisions, not the least of which was Kasey Keller seeming to make the very un-savvy veteran move of literally giving away a corner. (If you can handle it, watch the final five minutes of the game. Until the goal, there's nothing happening that suggests urgency on either side. It really looked like both sides were just waiting for the whistle.)
Still, still, still, I will argue that this was the worst game the Rave Green have played this year. If it seemed like they got roundly outplayed, nothing other than the score will convince you otherwise.
Sometimes, especially in soccer, statistics paint a fake picture. Unbalanced sheets are often the result of differing strategies and not reflective of actual play.
This was not one of those games.
The scoreboard may have said the Sounders led for about 63 minutes of the game and never trailed, but can you tell me, without looking, how many shots RSL keeper Nick Rimando had to stop? Can you tell me how many shots Seattle even got off? Do you remember any instances of either of those things? How about telling me a point in the game you felt we dominated possession?
Sure, you may have been lulled into the false security of feeling -- as I was -- that three points were all but had. I doubt you felt it was a result of dictating pace or momentum.
A quick glance at the score sheet will tell you why you probably don't remember many offensive highlights. Two shots: Zakuani's goal and one by Fredy Montero that resulted in Rimando's only save way back in the 20th minute. (Looking at replays, I'm still unconvinced of the own-goal, but that's how it reads in the record books for now.)
Even more, you'll notice that the Sounders -- who were among the best at creating chances in the first two weeks -- were limited to two corners, while surrendering 12 (coincidentally the same number that set a franchise record for them last week).
RSL fired off nine shots, and forced Keller to make three saves -- including one stop of a potential one-on-one with a streaking Kyle Beckerman and a brilliant foot save on another breakaway -- and seemed to dominate play in a way not that dissimilar from the way Seattle did against New York.
Defensively, I don't know that this was a particularly awful effort. There were some awful lapses, though, that seem rather inexcusable.
I'm willing to give Zakuani a bit of a pass on the first goal -- after watching the play several times I really don't think there was much he could have done to stop the one-touch pass that led to the goal.
Keller's decision to grab a harmless cross and give away a corner, though, was confusing. One of several things appears to have happened: Either the ball was off the on-ball defender, Alonso (but there's no signal from the assistant referee to indicate that), Keller thought it was off Alonso and was trying to keep the ball in play, or the referee made a mistake in awarding the corner. I've watched this play probably 15 times and still can't definitively figure out what happened there. Either way, I really wish Keller had let the ball go as there was no one really challenging him from RSL. In his defense, if the ball was not off Alonso, it should have been a goal kick as Keller was clearly already beyond the goal line when he grabbed the ball.
The goal itself was frustrating, too. Just the fact that this is the second goal on a corner in two games after not allowing any last year, should be a serious cause for concern. On this particular one, Alvaro Saborio was able to get free and get a clean header that gave Keller no chance. If not for some fortunate bounces, the Sounders could have very easily conceded another goal off a corner kick, this one in the 15th minute.
There were also many more turnovers in the defense end that may not have led to goals, but certainly kept the Sounders from generating much momentum.
That those turnovers did not lead to goals was largely a credit to Keller, who bailed out his defense on several occasions -- two of which I already mentioned.
Offensively, as Dave already mentioned, the forwards and mids just didn't seem to have any rhythm. Whether it was Ljungberg making questionable decisions to pass or shoot, Noonan failing to hook up with Montero or Zakuani on several occasions or Evans flubbing a great chance off a free kick from Ljungberg, the Sounders just didn't generate the pressure for which they're known.
If there was a positive to take out of the weekend (beyond actually scoring), it's that the MLS will probably be as wide open as it was last season. Only one team has three wins in three weeks (Los Angeles) and only one other has a clean sheet (Kansas City). New York and Houston lost this week, while Columbus also had to settle for a tie, and only four teams have more points than the Sounders. Despite a rough start, Seattle has not lost any significant ground.
Yes, it's a frustrating loss. We should also recognize that our side was roundly outplayed.
Luckily, it's a long season. And don't forget, we still have this guy to look forward to.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wanted to see Noonan against RSL.
Now I want to see Fucito. We’ve seen what Noonan can do, and he was not impressive. It wasn’t from pressure or bad luck, he just failed to connect and his lack of athleticism (comparatively) was pretty evident to me.
I thought the Sounders did a bit better then you make them out to, as there were several opportunities for shots where the Sounders just couldn’t make it happen. But the pressure was there. Still, I felt most of the game like we had the inferior team. Ball passing accuracy was non existent, there were way too many turnovers for no reason. And as you said, too many mental lapses.
Now with more lemon bars!
Can This Team Put It Together?
Great summary.
Between the Timber’s, the Red Bull’s and yesterday’s game I am really concerned about the Sounder’s level of cohesion and commitment . What I’ve seen in all three games is the following:
- Absolutely amateurish defensive lapses. Whiffed balls, short clears into and around the box, and constantly missed marks. How – at this level – can you miss marking your man not once but three times? Note that the Timber’s goal was also the result of a failure to mark a man.
- Really poor passing. For as much as the Sigi has indicated they are focusing on quick passes, they sure are often just terrible. Simple open passes with no defenders around that are missed and go out of bounds (Watch the first couple of minutes from the past two games). Passes that either have too much mustard on them or not enough.
- Alot of standing around waiting for the ball – especially evident last night.
- Inability to create or use space. This was very evident to me in the Red Bull’s game where there were often 2 or three players all within a few yards from each.
- Uncoordinated runs with serves and passes skipping through the box with no one there to receive.
Very ugly and really hard to watch and very worrisome. Right now this looks like a team that has never played together. Disappointing.
by Stephen Nesbitt on Apr 11, 2010 5:01 PM PDT reply actions
Looking at the bright side
It was a terrible game by the Sounders. I’m really worried that they’re going to have a sophomore slump now. They have not really looked good yet this season; we keep hearing quotes like, “We just have to play better,” or “There’s still a lot of soccer to be played,” but so far it’s been pretty uninspiring.
HOWEVER, having said that, there was one big positive to come out of this game: finishing. Last week I think most fans were really down on the lack of finishing. This game, yes, there were barely any shots on goad, BUT 1/2 of them went in (and even though it was credited as an own-goal, the Ljungberg and Marshall really created the 2nd goal). If the team can put together the finishing from this game with the domination of possession they achieved vs NYRB, they could be really good.
Hope I'm not painting too dire a picture
I don’t think there’s a lot of reason to get super worried — all the problems are correctable — but it would be a mistake if the Sounders come away from this game thinking “tough break, we should have won.”
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
Maybe they shouldn't have won,
but the fact that they came so close after looking like the worse side for much of the game makes the draw especially bitter tasting.
I totally agree
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 11, 2010 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Did anyone else notice?
I was dumbfounded to see no one on the back post during the last 30 seconds of a game while defending a corner kick
For the entire time Zakuani was on the field, he was on the back post for corner kicks. Levesque also was near the back post the first couple corners. Then, for whatever reason, during the last few corner kicks at about the 89th minute and on, we had absolutely no one on the back post. Poor marking, yes. Even poorer tactics.
So who is to blame? Did someone tell Levesque not to mark the backs post and to stand around the top of the 18?
I blame Keller, and Schmidt, and also Levesque. It seems obvious you would want some one on the back post, and as many bodies between the ball and the goal as you can get. Isnt it up to Keller to organize the defense? Or was it Schmidt’s decisions?
One of those 3 should have figured it out!
I didn’t think that Seattle played THAT badly most of the game… but that also could be because I couldn’t tell what was going on because the feed I was watching kept speeding up and slowing down. Anyways we all know (who ever is on the field) that if the Sounders can actually play well they can dominate any team.
I may have to go watch the archived game tomorrow to see if it’s any better than when it was live so I can make a real assessment. If we can almost win playing mediocre at best great things are possible.
Just a thought
So I think RSL played a better match than Seattle did but I have noticed something that may explain some of it. It isn’t the shoes, but the new ball used by MLS seems to be lighter and travels a little different. I know teams have practiced with it for a while and it is no excuse as others seem to have gotten the hang of the new ball quicker, but just putting it out there as a possible reason why so many passes from both sides seemed a bit heavy. In the passion of the moment when you are going full out, could that little extra on the ball be causing some of the issues?
Seems plausible
While you’re here, tho, what was your take on that fateful corner? Did the ref say Alonso touched it or was it a blown call, claiming Keller stepped out?
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 11, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions
From what I see in the replay...
So essentially there are 3 possibilities on that call as I see it. 1 Alonso touched it and it went out which then the call would be correct. 2 Alonso didn’t touch it and so it should have been a goal kick, or 3 that the ref called Keller for carrying it out of bounds. The third doesn’t make any sense because Keller seems to be moving inbounds as he catches the ball. So that would leave one of two. Either they called Alonso for touching it and he didn’t (wrong call) or he did touch it and then it would be correct. From the replay it doesn’t look like Alonso touched it because the trajectory doesn’t change… but it’s really hard to tell from the angle.
We are also a terrible grass team
We are much better on the turf.
Sounders have a winning record on grass
and all of those are on the road
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
that's exactly how i saw it
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 11, 2010 10:28 PM PDT reply actions
Hmm
I’m unconvinced. The stats may say that the Sounders were roundly outplayed, but to my eye (which admittedly was straying to beer and chit-chat too often to be reliable) it was a fairly even match between two sides who couldn’t put together many chances. The defences were well organised, the turnovers were typically high up the field… I don’t think we were dominated by any means.
Dominated might be wrong word
I did think, especially upon rewatching, that RSL had by far the better chances and was able to dictate play.
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 12, 2010 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd Beg To Differ
but, heck, I’m afraid I’m going to become known as a contrarian. Then again, thinking I’d ever be “known” anywhere is probably a poor reflection on my over-active ego.
I thought the Sounders played alright. I didn’t see a copious amount of great ideas coming out of RSL either. Fact is, if the Sounders would have won this, they’d have deserved it. The fact that the home team had the bulk of possession is no surprise—nearly every home team in the world does the same thing (unless they’re playing Barcelona or someone of their ilk). The approach is pretty much the same everywhere—play sound defense (okay, we were a little iffy at times on that front) and counter. We did so brilliantly on Zak’s goal. The second goal was a combination of pressure and poor defense. It’s rare, especially in MLS, when a visiting team dominates possession and opportunities. So in my mind, we followed the formula and nearly pulled if off to perfection. In the end, we broke down (by allowing a bit too much possession at the very end of the game) and ended up with a point. Nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, following your logic, there’s every reason to be VERY optismistic. If we can play the #1 team in the league last year (okay, arguable) to a tie on the road, even when we play semi-poorly, just think how great it’s going to be once this team finds its collective feet.
What we ended up with
Shouldn't be ashamed
Of course not, you come within seconds of victory, you should never be ashamed. Didn’t mean to imply that. I agree, it’s a good sign that the Sounders can get a road tie without playing their best. I just don’t want to pretend that this was a strong showing. I’d argue that all the sloppy passes make this game pass over from being a product of strategy and edging into too close for comfort.
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 12, 2010 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions
In that vein
Think about the matches last season when this squad only had a couple of shots on goal (off the top of my head, Revs at Quest, I think RSL @ RSL, the San Jose debacle… probably more I’m not thinking of at the moment). They didn’t sniff even 1 goal. The positive in this match was that despite only getting a couple of shots off, the Sounders still ended up with 2 pts. The finishing was really good. Other than that, I thought it was fairly ugly.
We’ll see what happens this coming week vs KC @ Qwest. I’d love to see them break the scoring drought at Qwest, but I’d bet you anything that KC will pack it in and look to counter in the air off of set pieces with Kamara. That’ll make it tough, but if the Sounders can score that’ll be a hugely positive development in my book.
Good teams win at home,
and draw on the road!
Yay! We’re good and RSL sucks!
And yes, Dave, I’m going to continue to beat that saying to death, because it is so true, and causes me such much pain and joy.
by Cornchops on Apr 12, 2010 9:14 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Um, Seattle only wins half at home these days
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by 

















