MLS Teams regularly start season with lesser talents
As the transfer window is about to close on April 15th (see, that day is kind of important) it should be noted that many teams are still adding players. This includes the soon to visit Kansas City Wizards who just added Indian (sub-continent) Forward Sunil Chhetri to their squad. Yes, they lost Zoltan to an ACL injury, but Chhetri has been in camp for a while, so this was an intended move for some time. The Wizards are actually making this move from a position of strength.
That is not the case for Toronto, Red Bull, and Philly. All teams that will be adding starting caliber players on the fly, not from within their system, but in some cases guys that have never practiced with the team. Why would so many MLS sides think that it is a good idea to add starting talent that does not understand the system, rather than during the 2 and a half month pre-season?
Take Toronto for example. Today they added two defenders and last week they added a different one . Three defenders added as Toronto continues to figure out defensive woes that are so bad they inspired this exchange over twitter.
Kyle McCarthy: @GoalUSA: Monday MLS Breakdown: Defensive Problems Continue To Plague Toronto FC: http://tinyurl.com/y4j5syl
Dave Clark:: shorter tweet possible- Toronto still Toronto.
McCarthy: Tough to disagree, though Preki could fix it if he gets the personnel. RT @sounderatheart: shorter tweet possible- Toronto still Toronto.
DuNord: @kylejmccarthy @sounderatheart- i wouldn't doubt it if 5 TFC fans straight out of the stands could do a better job week in/week out.
A multi-year problem is being handled on the fly during the first month of the season, as if there was not a long pre-season in which to figure this out. Did First Kick sneak up on Mo?
He isn't alone.
The Union of Philadelphia added a solid player, a former USL-1 MVP, but they did it after they got beat in Seattle. And really only a few days before their next match. Arrieta is a solid addition, but why in the world would they desire to add him AFTER the season starts?
Maybe it was just because they really needed to add defense? One would than have to explain why they are looking at both Luciano Emilio and Carlos Ruiz. It is called grasping at straws, and is the result of poor planning.
The list goes on though, Red Bull New York are looking at adding Luke Rodgers from England's League Two (that's the fourth division). Four games into their season and they are adding a player who will take a few weeks to get use to the new side.
None of these additions were due to unforeseen injuries, but instead are just issues of planning, communication and ignoring possible early points. Last year Red Bull added nearly a full squad just prior to the closing of the window, but by then they had already fallen so far behind that the additions were bound to be meaningless (some didn't even make it through the year).
Sure a tweak here and there wouldn't be a surprise, but it happens so often, for so many teams one could wonder what the advantage is for a team that actually practices together during the 10 week preseason and that takes the pitch with an "ideal" roster over the first 3 games?
If an average MLS side gets 4 points in that stretch is there an extra point? or two? or three? Should the Union be at 4 points rather than 3, if they had one of Ruiz/Emilio and Arrieta rather than Myrie I would find it likely.
Maybe I shouldn't point this out to everyone who can read, but in a few cases we are talking about teams that do this year after year, and that are bad during that time.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fall v. Summer
I actually somewhat agree with the Toronto’s of the league. If you’re in the midst of ‘rebuilding’ (which is a nebulous term for those who have followed the league at length), ‘and’ you want to make a moderate-to-big splash with regard to transfers, it’s not a bad move to wait until the summer when you have a better sense of your team’s immediate and long term needs and have the option of picking up players on a free.
And here’s the kicker: I have a hunch that Adrian Hanauer is employing the same strategy this season (we all heard the cries of ‘where are the moves?!’ this past offseason). He was able to nab Leo Gonzalez last season and already has a deal in place to grab Nkufo. I wouldn’t be surprised if he picked up a few more players with the allocation money and DP slots the club has available to them.
As long as the league is scheduled in a different part of the year than the rest of the world, there will continue to be clubs in the league who employ this strategy.
I'm not saying to ignore the Secondary WIndow
But instead baffled by the teams that bring guys in 3 matches into the season.
These are seperate issues.
As for the summer schedule being different from “the rest of the world” let’s not ignore Scandanavia, Russia, and the dozens of other leagues that also have summer schedules.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Not sure one can distinguish between the two...
If a manager kept a roster short for the summer transfer window, then added 1-2 guys in the interim before the summer window, the reason he’s short players is still in anticipation of that window; the 1-2 guys added are just a side product of that and may make it look as if adding guys 2-3 games into the season is the team’s primary roster management strategy.
Yea it doesn't seem to make sense
If you take the Sounders as an example. We had a plethora of people coming in and out of camp during preseason. Granted we had a pretty good base to start with but still. Since it’s a little hard to follow all the teams in preseason I wouldn’t know if any others have really done this, but it doesn’t really seem like it.
From the one team I did kind of pay attention to (the Union) I didn’t see them really try and go after too many in preseason except maybe Torres, and Califf… Other than that they have pretty much kept their roster as the trades, SuperDraft, Expansion Draft that happened before preseason started… and they still have like 3 senior roster spots available. I would think if they have that many spaces open still they should have had a larger group of players coming in and out of camp to see who would fit… but they really didn’t.
Really I don’t think Toronto was that bad of a team last year… they just majorly underperformed. This year everything has been changing at the wrong times. They are in a downward spiral that maybe hard to get out of… but doesn’t excuse the fact of trying to revamp the defense 2 games into the season… that should have been figured out in preseason.
This is also something that maybe plays into this problem for preseason. Many teams play mostly USL and MLS teams (who themselves are in preseason obviously), as well as a few University teams as their warm up matches. Because of that I think most teams may think they have a good team since they are winning most of those games. When in reality they are playing teams that almost any random assortment of MLS talent could be able to beat. As a result of this they get exposed because the teams they beat are now using their full rosters and not playing to look at players. I’m not sure what their reasoning is but it’s just a thought.
Obviously all teams are going to be looking at the Summer window for chances to sign people on free transfers. That’s just a given.
by majora999 on Apr 13, 2010 11:00 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Toronto has been well short of a full roster
all preseason. I remember Duane lamenting it. I don’t really understand it. They’re guaranteed to have Voyageurs Cup games, so they could use a little flexibility. I know they have cap issues, though.
However, if you’re a player, it’s nice to know you’re practically guaranteed a spot on the 18. For every single game.
With the transfer window, it makes no difference to add these players now vs. 3 months ago, right? So I agree. Why wait? It’s not like they’re giving the players they have a chance—their rosters aren’t even full.

by 
















