What the new DP rule means
By now you are probably familiar with the gist of the new DP rule, in particular you've started dreaming of a Juninho, or a Deco, maybe an Henry. All of the speculation will be about players that are "one namers." Much of this focus will be misplaced, as it operates under the old paradigm when a team only got one bullet and so the shot a team
took had to be perfect.
This mis-analysis isn't limited to fans, but even owners are still looking for perfect rather than looking to just plain improve the team.
"We would love to find a designated player to bring in that fits our criteria, but it’s going to have to be someone who is or has been a world-class player and who also can move the needle in other ways for the league," Kraft said.
This level of caution in American soccer is to be expected, but wrong.
Imagine Olympic events like Half Pipe, or Diving. If contestants were only allowed a single performance on which they were judged would they take the risks and push the envelope, or are they now pushing those limits because they have more than one chance.
Major League Soccer has the opportunity to take the risks. With the ability to sign more than one DP MLS can take some risks. DPs don't need to be the next Beckham, but instead can be solid, good players who contribute on the pitch.
With 3 DPs, a Generation Addidas player and a few solid players within the standard salary structure a passing game can develop and succeed. The beautiful game in America can be beautiful, it can be a mid-major, rather than minor league.
So as Andrew Winner writes for MLSsoccer.com looking at icons
Seattle: Alessandro Nesta. The Milan icon’s experience and guile alongside Jhon Kennedy Hurtado would likely create the best defensive partnership in MLS history. How about Arjen Robben? A do-everything midfielder like the flying Dutchman on the right side would leave acres of space for Steve Zakuani on the left. Maybe bring Michael Bradley back to MLS. A two-way midfielder would free Freddie Ljungberg and Fredy Montero from their defensive duties. -- Andrew Winner
It may be better to just look at good players who fit a team's needs. In the old era there were only 16 DPs possible in 2010, now there are up to 48. That math should change the type of DP, not just the number. It shouldn't matter if they are a 2M$ player, or just a 750k$. If they make the team better, that is key. Let the General Managers, and Sporting Directors, pick players based on skill. Let the marketers than market the talent.
Just one last reminder, though no MLS team with a DP has won the MLS Cup, let's remember that a team with a DP was more likely to make the Playoffs than one without a DP.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
saw Robben play in munich this year
Fantastic skills and great vision. He would be an amazing add. He is getting up there a touch, so maybe he might consider, but I am not sure we can attract that class to MLS quite yet. Bradley would be another great addition, but seems he has something to prove in the Bundesliga. Great post, thanks.
Would love to see Robben in rave green
At 26 he should be right in his peak playing (and earning) years, so he’s probably not a likely candidate. Also not sure how long his contract with Bayern Munich runs. Nice fantasy, though.
Bradley is out of the question
With every major team in Europe taking a long, hard look at Bradley, it isn’t likely he’d want to regress at this point in his career. I like how Arjen woud give us pretty much the most feared outside mids in the league. But, utimately, Marshall is old, two knee surgeries in the past 5 years…. go for a solid, durable c-back please. Our defense is one c-back injury from being VERY vulnerable over the course of the season.
I don't want another Beckham
and by that I mean I wouldn’t want to go out and sign Messi or Ronaldo or whatever hot-as-hell player is out there right now. I would want someone who has consistently been solid, quietly dominating in his position. Funny you mention Juninho; if he wasn’t so old and under his 2 year contract with the Qatari league, I would say to sign him up.
You don't think Messi is consistently solid?
7500 to Holte - American footy fans are slightly unprepared
by Kirsten Schlewitz on Apr 2, 2010 7:28 AM PDT up reply actions
That came out wrong
My theory is there is a price vs skill ceiling we have to account for. I don’t think we’d be any better off signing Messi than if we signed van Nistelrooy or Defoe. We don’t need to sign the next Pele because it would be a waste of money and talent. I think Beckham was a waste as far as signing a player to help them out, I think they paid too much and weren’t able to fully utilize him. I know it was a decision to draw fans but that’s the beside the point.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Got it; that makes much more sense.
7500 to Holte - American footy fans are slightly unprepared
by Kirsten Schlewitz on Apr 2, 2010 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Oddly enough
Just went to soundersfc.com and saw this headline: http://www.soundersfc.com/News/Articles/2010/04-April/MLS-Adds-DP-Slots.aspx
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Nevermind
They changed it. It said, “Messi to Seattle?” regarding the 2nd/3rd DP slots
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
They still have "Messi to Seattle?" on the main page, though
so they didn’t quite get rid of it.
by seattle_since_81 on Apr 2, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Juninho has been a dream on this site for nearly a year
and he went to the only team I despise in Qatar
I am not a Supporter
I am not a Fan
I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I don't follow the Qatar league
so I wouldn’t know… but I do remember when he signed with them and MLS did nothing to pursue before that. He was a perfect DP candidate.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm an al-Sadd fan
I follow the Qatari League as a way to keep in touch with Arab Football.
I am not a Supporter
I am not a Fan
I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I tried
but lost interest after I read that the owners are basically oil magnates that don’t care about the sport, they just buy players and like to win.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Qatar is bidding for the World Cup
They would build 8 amazing state of the art stadiums with air-conditioning or other climate control measures, and yet very green. I wouldn’t be surprised if they make the short list.
I am not a Supporter
I am not a Fan
I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
blaise nkufo
You make a great point. I saw somewhere someone posted it would be stupid to use a dp spot on a player like blaise because he isn’t paid that much. However. It saves us a ton of cap space, gives us a low risk/high reward dp, and fulfills a need. It would also leave us withanother dp spot to get that CAM
by DarthGreedo on Apr 2, 2010 7:28 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
It's still unclear
Whether his salary even qualifies as DP level. If he’s “only” being paid like $450k (I don’t know if that’s for half the season or the full-season equivalent), and he only plays half the season, that would leave just over $225k, which is still almost $100k less than the DP hit.
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 2, 2010 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Apparently...A
A DP signed at midseason only counts $167k against salary cap. Sounds like it might make sense for Nkufo to count, but it still opens the door for a third.
Because if it's not Love
Then it's the bomb ...
That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 2, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Makes Zero Sense
in light of the fact that Adrian was quoted yesterday as saying that they have already finessed his (N’Kufo’s) contract into the team (btw, he’s only actually getting paid a little under $250,000 this season since he joins in July). Look, when you’re signing a DP you ARE looking to sign a player of high income, because providing the player brings value, you are getting far better value for the spot.
Absolutely spot-on post
I don’t see Robben as someone looking to the MLS, at least not without a Beckham-style contract. But bringing in solid players is an excellent way to build the league.
You still have the basic questions though: why would an up-and-coming talent prefer to play in the MLS, and is it worth it to spend the money on an older (less picky) player? Obviously teams have done fairly well getting DP’s to come but they certainly haven’t all been successes. Maybe the real advantage of the new rule is that clubs have more ability to sign and develop young talent (like Montero) and also have the money to keep the kid out of the Big Clubs reach. I don’t follow the MLS as a whole as much as I’d like to, so if I’m off here someone please let me know!
Is it always money though?
If I were a pro player, I’d want to go where I know I’d be appreciated and the people around actually pay attention to the sport, where it’s actually mainstream and popular, and to be able to play with the best of the best.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions
On the other hand
One of the things Ljungberg likes about being here is the relative anonymity.
Yeah but
you’d imagine a player would only appreciate the relative anonymity after he’s lived the opposite and been famous for a while like Ljungberg or Schelotto. For up-and-comers like, say, Montero, you’d imagine he wouldn’t mind getting a lot of attention for a while. Only after you’ve had it would it typically wear off.
My thought
IF you can get a name everyone knows ( Henry ) go for it. It helped the bottom line getting Ljungberg.
Otherwise, I say go for an American.
Altidore has to be sick of playing for a “not being the worse team in the league is a victory” type team. 6 wins in 32 games just can’t appeal to anyone outside of a complete loser.
What about the guys barely playing in the Scottish leagues and worse ?
If players are going to get big playing time in South Africa, seen by many Americans, MLS teams that can should be going after them Landon style…..
Still
to compare to American Football, I bet any CFL player would jump at the chance to join a crappy NFL team. Much like I would assume an MLS player would jump at the chance to play for anyone in the Premier League, La Liga, etc.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Sure, but NFL teams have a chance of winning it all.
I’d bet there’s quite a few players who get sick of playing on teams that are basically guaranteed to lose. And it’s not hard to start convincing yourself that MLS is better then its reputation. I mean, Donovan is there. Beckham was there. Ljunberg is there.
Now with more lemon bars!
Yeah
Because the NFL pays more. No one WANTS to play for those loser teams, they HAVE to.
All Altidore talk would be because he would get paid more to come here, otherwise why would he ? Maybe he values living in the US, but all factors the same you are going to have to pay. It is the reason he plays there in the first place.
I don’t believe all MLS players would jump. I believe they jump for more money. Why is Ljungberg here ? Because he can’t make Burnley….Give me a break. Why is Henry coming here ? Because he can’t play non Big Two La Liga. Give me a break.
MLS has a lot to offer players that make a name. Altidore has to know that and there is no way he is not sick of losing. No one wants to play for the loser teams. We have all been there and we all agree IT SUCKS. The only reason LD enjoyed playing for the non-winning teams so much was….they were winning.
That's true
Losing sucks no matter where you are. I just still can’t imagine that an international would leave relative fame to come to a fledgling league where most of the country could care less about the sport. Maybe if they were on a loser team like Burnley and getting zero playing time I could see them making the jump. But if that was the case, we probably wouldn’t even be looking at them in the first place.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions
When people say most of the country doesn't care about the sport, that may be true.
You are also talking about a country of 300 million people. Versus countries in the 40-60 million population range. Soccer doesn’t need to have the success European clubs do. It could have only 10% of the population in love with Soccer, and it would still pull half the total population of England or France.
Now with more lemon bars!
I think we would look at someone from Hull City, no ?
What if your team ( Hull ) were going to relegated to the minor league they call Champions league ?
You might be switching teams at that point…crazy not to actually….and Seattle might have a certain appeal, dollars being equal maybe even better.
Better endorsements, even Beckham could make it work here, an American star can definitely make it work better here.
You are in your home country, better food, teeth etc. ( sorry )
You play for a title rather than just a paycheck
There is a risk sure, but the upside of being in a growing league is HUGE. Beckham is not stupid, he wants to own a team, now.
I guess that sounded harsh
Hull/Burnley/etc for sure have good players. My guess though is it seems like we tend to go towards aging vets who are maybe losing their sheen in top European leagues, but are still more than good enough for MLS. I don’t claim to be any sort of expert on scouting though. This is all based on what I’ve seen going on amongst teams.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 2, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















