Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

GameThread Match Day 6: Seattle Sounders FC at Toronto FC

WIth just about a half hour until kickoff we open up the gamethread. Keys to the Game, and the Scouting Report are both up for you to review, but now its just abou the boys on the pitch and what they can do to pull 4 points out of the Double. Oh, and as always with a TFC match, Duane will have sober second thoughts tomorrow. Today we only wonder if he can survive the day.

If they get 3 Seattle will be in a solid position with Red Bull and the Galaxy. Getting zero puts them in the middle of the pack. Oh, and if you think the West continues to be better than the East, you are right. Standings.

Sounders lineup has a series of much more significant twists than I thought

 

 

Ljungberg

 

 

Nyassi

 

 

 

Evans

 

Alsonso

 

Sturgis

 

 

 

Vagenas

 

 

Wahl

 

 

 

Riley

 

Marshall

 

Ianni

 

 

 

Keller

 

 

The late significant changes means that we won't be having pretty here today, and how the Central Mids play is really up for debate at the end of the match.

Subs: Hurtado, Montero, Zakuani, Levesque, Gonzalez, Estrada, Boss

 

KING5 with the broadcast of Arlo White.

Your thoughts, and live analysis in the comments.

Comment 284 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Will we see Leo as a Midfield sub today?

I could see it happening, because it would add to the attack.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Pre-game is stating that Evans will be up top

Its been a long time since he’s done it, but it would help Sounders efforts at high pressure.

With this lineup though I just think that post-game will be a better time to assess formations. There should windup with a lot of shifting.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 10:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Late arriving crowd in Toronto today

Heavy rains and winds.

Or is the shine coming off?

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

The shine is coming off.

The Seahawks have traded my signature to the Detroit Lions for a 6th round draft pick.

by SSreporters on Apr 25, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Missed the pregame

Is Fucito too hurt to play and that is keeping him out of the lineup/subs or is that just Sigi’s decision?

by 02Coug on Apr 25, 2010 11:03 AM PDT reply actions  

He's hurt

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too bad

Seems like a good time for him to get time.

by 02Coug on Apr 25, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Odd

The Sounders crest that King 5 is different from the one on the shirts.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Can controlling the crowd really be a key?

Do they score or prevent goals?

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Translation: TFC is pretty much just DeRosario

But we had to come up with something else to say, otherwise it would have been the Key to the Game.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hmm... Sturgis out wide.

I don’t know enough about Sturgis to know if that’s good or bad.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:08 AM PDT reply actions  

I would expect a much flatter wide play

really only 3 attacking players on the pitch.

In pre-season Sturge was complimented by Sigi for improving his game, particularly in the attack, but he didn’t much time wide.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

5th Minute

Sounders have had stronger passing sequences so far, and the only threat on goal.

Just like last year, the Sounders are better at the short pass, while Toronto has spent time with long balls in the air during crappy weather.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Terrible crowd

Torontonians are weather pussies.

Good luck Sounders, although I fear a whipping from you guys on TFC.

The Seahawks have traded my signature to the Detroit Lions for a 6th round draft pick.

by SSreporters on Apr 25, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

6th minute

Nyassi’s run there was solid, but his pass was just poor. So much potential that is yet imcomplete.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

7th minute

Saric with a foul on Ljungberg.

Not the best call, but Seattle must take advantage. Shame that Montero isn’t playing. Nice sportsmanship. from Saric.

Drop ball?

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Guess that was just an injury pause?

No foul?

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

9th Minute Corner

Ljungberg to provide service

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Ianni had a strong run

and a decent shot. Just missed it.

I really like what Ianni brings to the match. Just a touch more offense from the back.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, that was a well taken corner

Just couldn’t get above it, but nice cross in and nice run by Ianni to get there first.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

13 minutes in and a well called match

I can’t really argue with these calls.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Well, advantage should have been played on that Riley foul

There’s no way there’s more benefit to a free kick next to your own penalty area is better than your winger with the ball on a break.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

In this league though?

If this is the worst call of the day the referee deserves a doubling of salary.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, definitely

Not playing advantage when it’s due is one of my big pet peeves.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

14th minute and a Yellow

TFC CDM Saric earns his 3rd yellow of his season.

I don’t know if that was worthy of a yellow, but with a history like that he isn’t goign to get the default.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Where to watch the game...

hey, does anyone know where I can watch the game? I live in Sweden so ever since MLS reformed the whole online video package deal its been a constant struggle to find the Sounders games on Justin.tv and similar sights and I can’t seem to find one today…

by AdamTheLord on Apr 25, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Its only 30$ US or so

Not a huge cost, and the video quality is good.

You can even watch 3 matches at once if there are overlapping matches.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah but

the problem is the player only works within the US and Canada, otherwise there wouldn’t be a problem.

by AdamTheLord on Apr 25, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

didn't know that

I’ll let the Sounders know that said policy destroys the concept of being an international club.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

The annoying thing

Is that I know the Sounders could do streaming much better than MLS.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

18th minute and another Yellow on TFC

Seattle didn’t take a good play on goal, but eventually wins the corner.

A lot of clutter in the box, but no real threats.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:25 AM PDT reply actions  

Nice sequence there before the corner, though

Hopefully they can make that kind of thing pay off.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:27 AM PDT reply actions  

Certainly strong pressure

but pretty passes mean little to me

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

You have to finish them, sure

But you have to get there first. The Sounders have struggled to break down bunkering teams, and good passing is key to that.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone know some good places to watch away games?

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 11:27 AM PDT reply actions  

A huge list

Atlantic Crossing
George and Dragon
3 Kings
College Inn
Doyle’s Public House
Fado
Elysian Fields

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

and dozens more

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

hmm ok, thanks.

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

The more I see Ianni

The more I like him. He’s definitely our defender for the future.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:31 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

26th minute

and Ljungberg gets knocked into the boards by the Keeper Frei

Isn’t worth a foul, but still not pure play

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Liking the KING broadcast

Excellent commentary. Do they show every Sounders’ game, or only a few?

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 11:35 AM PDT reply actions  

KONG normally has it with the same broadcast team

KING only 2 times a year

Arlo White was brought on this year to replace Calabaro.

and good to see you!

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

don't konw that I loved the angle

Maybe a pass to the runner in the box

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

28th minute

Seattle has clearly controlled play, but with this US Open Cup lineup they just aren’t getting the chances that they need.

Too many turnovers.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I wouldn't worry too much

This Toronto lineup isn’t too impressive, either, and Seattle’s creating chances. Think they’ll take this one pretty easily.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seattle has given up 4 goals from PK/Corner this year

So I’ve been trained to not feel safe

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

All those that love grass

Check out how poorly the brand new field looks only a handful of matches into the season plays.
Large chunks of field missing

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Indeed

I’ve never been a grass at all costs guy. It can work well, but you have to do so much maintenance to keep it in good shape, especially with the kind of weather you get in the early season in places like Toronto and Seattle, and the problem is that bad grass tends to be pretty awful. In my mind, good turf can work just as well; it’s not as great as perfect grass, but it’s not as bad as bad grass, and you can’t usually have perfect grass all year. Also, turf tends to be better in bad weather (at least from my playing experience). Think the grass movement is more of a way to attract international players/a PR move to appeal to the fans than anything to do with the actual quality of the playing surface.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

38th minute

Ljungberg to Evans seems to be working, except for the lack of finish.

That service was great. Excellent ball movement.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

What did Nyassi do?

how was that a Yellow?

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

started moving to block the shot before the ball was touched.

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

see below.
MLS refs=trash

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

It was for encroachment

Even though he didn’t encroach. Just another MLS refereeing moron moment.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

45th minute

Seattle looks strong enough with the ball that they are on a fast break even with the numbers against them.

That was a 3 on 6 and I thought the Sounders were likely to score.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Anyone else wish that Montero would consistently work as hard as Ljungberg?

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

TFC just looks hesitant on the attack

They can’t get anything going and seem almost afraid to swing the ball in.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Corners

They’re creating corners, though, and as Dave pointed out above, those can be dangerous. Not doing much from open play, but they’ve actually looked better than I would have expected.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

Right as I said that they went on a strong attack.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

0-0

This game may be 0-0, but it’s already more interesting than Vancouver – St. Louis (Div II) was last night. At least both teams are going forward here; St. Louis didn’t record a single shot on net in that one.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 11:53 AM PDT reply actions  

that late corner had every sounder back

they’ve learned.

No need to have an outlet pass when time could be called at any moment.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Halftime thoughts

Though Seattle has a US Open Cup Lineup they are dominating play, though not the score. Seattle for the most part has controlled the run of play through delicate short passes with a few good connections that could have wound up as goals.

Brad Evans in the forward role has had his chances, but the years since being expacted to score might be a reason that his two clear opportunties haven’t scored.

Ianni, Evans, and Ljungberg have all been very strong this match.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 11:56 AM PDT reply actions  

I've been really glad not to see any punt and pray

There have been some clearances, but they have been trying to actually make intelligent passes and patiently create opportunities.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 11:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Great point

the long ball has been very rare from Seattle, and the times they use it they are connecing.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Possession has been nice to see

They really seem to be linking passes together nicely. Even their switches have been on target for the most part, from what I saw.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Nyassi got a yellow for being fast

It looked like he started after the ball was touched and the ref was surprised to see him there.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

That's what I thought seeing the replay

He didn’t move until the first touch. Man, he accelerates fast, though.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone expecting a half time sub?

Zakuani is really the only speed on the bench, but Seattle could use a little bit right now.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Nothing yet

60th minute maybe? Depending on what happens between now and then.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Damn Sturge

two opportunities from great play but no result

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Toronto may need to rename themselves

The Yellows

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Is anyone else concerned about our ability to generate all these chances and not convert?
Against a better team…

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

55th minute corner won by Riley

That string of play was great, but a goal here is necessary.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

about as close as you can get.

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

The credit for this corner goes to Ljungberg, great effort to regain possession

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

stupid.

I fucking hate you Mariners

by kentroyals5 on Apr 25, 2010 12:22 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

clear the damn ball

that was purely on the efforts on Alonso and a lack of clearence.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions  

I completely agree

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indeed. Will be interesting to see now if TFC sit back with the lead or if they keep pressing for a second.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alonso…wtf?

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Holy....

Their first real chance all day.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Time for a sub

Looks like Zakuani is coming on

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:24 PM PDT reply actions  

If we lose we beat ourselves. cant finish and sloppy clearing

Sometimes things never change

I fucking hate you Mariners

by kentroyals5 on Apr 25, 2010 12:25 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Nkufo better be damn good...

It would be nice to have a more than one healthy striker on the roster.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Zakuani's pass was great

and Evans just can’t finish AGAIN.

The earned corner results in a deep throw

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Good attempt by Evans

But he shouldn’t have tried to go between the keepers legs

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Evans 0-3 on finishing chances today

Although he’s done well to get himself into position

by moyerLIVES on Apr 25, 2010 12:27 PM PDT reply actions  

On a similar note...

Would we have scored today if instead of a goalkeeper, Toronto had fielded a 4×4 sheet of plywood in the center of the net? Sadly, no.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:27 PM PDT reply actions  

sturgis fouled from behind again

this time not called.

kid has just been hammered today

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Punt and pray is starting to creep in again

And it’s unsurprising that Sturgis is hurt. They’re really going after him for some reason today.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

I think he was just a bit slower in possesion.

Toronto has been looking to take out anyone with the ball and Sturgis was a bit slower to get rid of it.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

get up sturge..

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

71st minute

Attakora’s clearence was awful.

Seattle has to take advantage of this, and doesn’t

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:36 PM PDT reply actions  

painting pretty pictures indeed

I love the metaphor

sadly seattle painted those pictures in the first half, but didn’t get anything for it.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Wahl sat on that too long

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

We don’t deserve this game.
Lazy plays in the midfield.

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Midfield?

Two really bad defensive plays by Alonso and Tyronne….

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wahl gave no effort in the midfield and lost possession which lead to that sequence.

proud 4th line advocate
resident master jinxer

by iced on Apr 25, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

WTF?

Our touch is killing us today.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Marshall gave them that goal

the Sounders retreated into giving Toronto the ball

The Reds just took advantage of that gift

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Just like Alonso gave them the first

Horrible ball control both times gives Toronto the ball on a silver platter.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Estrada for Riley?

That makes no sense

Vagenas has been CRAP

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Right wing

2 goals down Riley would be simply running the right wing anyway so you might as well have a true right-winger out there. But yes, Pass-back has been poor.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Riley is a better defender than Vagenas though

could have gone 3-4-3 with the change

but this does nothign to add to the attack

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I see this as a 3-4-3 now

And I do see Estrada as better in attack than Riley, but oh well.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Finishing

We have three open chances with only the keeper to beat and either miss the net or hit it straight to the keeper. Problem is we did not have a single striker on the field today until Montero and he is not exactly showing much this year in terms of movement.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:44 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree...

But really, what is to be said about Alonso playing Coerver drills on the top of the 18 and Marshall working as Toronto’s CAM?

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice to see Montero moving well though...

He needs this urgency from the opening whistle. It is really unfortunate Fucito is down because I think Montero needs some competitive pressure to improve. Maybe he thinks the summer transfer is already done but he does not seem to play with much fire this year.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ljungberg's corners/free kicks have been low

And they are all getting blocked fairly easily

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:51 PM PDT reply actions  

He had that one good one earlier

But yeah, after that it’s been all low.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Corners

I have never been too impressed with his corners going back to last year. I would rather have him in the box and I think Le Toux completely outclassed him last year.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice work by Zakuani

But the cross wasn’t quite good enough.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Don't we wish

No, two stupid errors gifted Toronto two goals.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

One of my biggest problems with the Sounders

Often when we are given the same gifts, we can’t make the results.

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

That was Jaqua's role

Basically, these goals we gave up today were “garbage goals”.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Any idea

On how much longer Jaqua is out for?

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's about another month or so

The surgery was around two or three weeks ago and they were talking about seven weeks or so.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

no it isn't

Toronto got 2 goals off of Sounders miscues

This was gifted to them

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:54 PM PDT reply actions  

On the positive side...

I believe these will be the first assists of the year for Alonso and Marshall!

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

92nd minute

Another Seattle corner

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 12:56 PM PDT reply actions  

And another high Evans header. We’ve got to keep those down

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ducking their heads

Both Evans and Sturgis had their chins on their chests when heading open looks and the ball predictably went over the net. U-12 stuff there for my money.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, that sucked.

Our level of play was definitely higher than theirs, but you can’t just hand goals over like that.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:00 PM PDT reply actions  

True. Those turnovers were costly, and there wasn’t much finishing. Thought this game reflected better on Seattle than Toronto for the long term, though; they played pretty well for most of it, except for those defensive mistakes. Correct those and they should be in good shape.

Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.

by Andrew Bucholtz on Apr 25, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except that these are the same mistakes we've been seeing this year

Seattle is prone to errors, and especially prone to wasting quality opportunities.

The passing of the sounders in the Final third isn’t the problem.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well that was fun...

Sigh… out to see some blue skies. Later all.

by brokejumper on Apr 25, 2010 1:01 PM PDT reply actions  

Whoa....I did not see that coming. I'm not even sure that was indeed Toronto FC out there.

Some terrible defending by Alonso as well as the gaffe from Marshall. Sounders looked off today, but we were great in the 2nd half.

Oh well, tough luck on the loss, I still think the Sounders are a good team and had a lot of chances to score. Stefan Frei stood on his head.

Good luck the rest of the season.

The Seahawks have traded my signature to the Detroit Lions for a 6th round draft pick.

by SSreporters on Apr 25, 2010 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

It could have been a U-9 team

We might as well have kicked the ball into the goal ourselves.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well this game sure showed the lack of depth in the midfield.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Really?

If the midfield was the problem than you are advocating that Alonso sits?

Vagenas had some poor passes, but this loss wasn’t his fault. Alonso and Marshall screwed up with poor outlets and Evans wasted opportunities, but the midfield itselft played very well.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed, the problems were elsewhere this game

Not finishing is classic Sounders, but the horrible defensive mistakes where the whole story of this match. There’s not really anything else to say about this game. Any other problems we might have seen we see in each and every Sounders match.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your right this loss wasn’t his fault but the line up thought like i said i am surprised Seattle went with a 4-1-2-2-1 line up. Leaving Freddie up alone thought wasn’t a good choice.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Plenty of offense was generated

Ljungberg by himself was fine.

I would be willing to see that happen more often.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blame the line-up

The sorry excuse for today’s line-up was primarily the reason for our loss. Yeah, Marshall and Alonso made some stupid mistakes, but they are solid players. The mistakes were made later in the game, and due in great part to the fact that we hadn’t finished on multiple chances. Those mistakes are a whole lot more tolerable if we’re up 1-0 or 2-0. Still not excusable, but a lot easier to deal with and come out of with at least one point or maybe even the full three.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alonso flubbed the ball because Evans didn't get his header in the net?

What?

I love Alonso, and I think he doesn’t get nearly enough credit for the great work he does, but this game he flubbed it big time, and Marshall shares in that blame.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

This isn’t a game to be pointed at Sigi, nor at Chemistry

It rests on three players. Two on defense and one on offense.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Today's formation would work really well with a forward who can finish chances

Nkufo is supposed to be that guy, but we’ll see. It might even be the solution for when Jaqua gets back.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Weak starting line-up means...

…weak performance overall. Not really sure why we had to sit our best goal scorers, but Brad Evans is NOT a suitable alternative. I’m sure either Zakuani or Montero could have finished on at least one if not more of those chances, and that definitely would have changed the tone of the match. Instead, Toronto capitalizes on our defensive mistakes, and we can’t score. The exact OPPOSITE of our strategy on the road to be the first to score, and put the home team on the defensive. Really damn frustrating if you ask me…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Neither is PV or sturgis

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

you can’t expect Ljundgren to carry the entire team offensively, that just won’t work. And also leaving out two of our best defenders? Hurtado and Gonzalez?? Sigi’s line-up was asking for a loss…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sturgis played well

You would be hard pressed to show that he wasn’t a solid addition to the lineup.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was quite happy with sturgis for this game. I thought he worked hard to show he belonged out there

by Derek R on Apr 25, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

solid play yes, but not at the expense of some of our better players…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ll admit sturgis played well i just don’t think 4-5-1 is a good line up or at least in the way sigi had it today.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except that there wasn't a strategic or tactical decision that was wrong

Today’s loss rests on the players.

Not the coach.

Evans had several clear opportunities. Sigi can’t make him score those.

Alonso and Marshall blew two clearences. That isn’t Sigi’s fault.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

you can’t tell me some of the blame doesn’t lie with Sigi… he chose the damn lineup! What was he thinking with four of our best starters off the pitch?? Maybe it could have been Gonzalez or Hurtado making one or two of those clearances? And Montero or Zakuani finishing on one of those chances? Sigi himself doesn’t play, but he dictates the tone of the game from the start with the line-up he choses, especially one as wildly different as this one!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

It might have been theoretically possible

But Gonzalez or Hurtado wouldn’t have replace Alonso or Marshall, so they both would have been on the field.

You’d have some argument if it were Wahl and Ianni who handed the match to Toronto on a silver platter, garnished with lemon zest and rosemary, but they both played really well.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually they played pretty well for a good part of the game

If we don’t gift them those two goals, right now we’re talking about a workmanlike road draw, and still wondering who’s going to actually finish.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

we shouldn’t be satisfied with “a wormanlike road draw” against teams like Toronto, especially after having to suffer a ref-induced disgusting draw against Dallas. Unless we step up the play, especially on the road, this season may start slipping away.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Toronto has the 3rd best home record over their life

A draw would have been a great result.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

a draw right now sounds great, but trust me, we should be WINNING games like this. Use the previous draw as motivation, go with the same team from last game, and come home with 4 points on the road trip rather than a lousy 1 point.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um, yeah...

I’m pretty sure the draw wasn’t the plan, especially since Ljungberg was talking before the game how they wanted six points before they left on the trip and that after the Dallas debacle they wanted four.

Note that the two players who gifted the game to Toronto were regular starters. Some times this stuff just happens.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

of course this stuff happens, but with a different line-up, that may have never been the case. Everything changes if you can score on one or two of those chances. Fact is, I was extremely suspect of the line-up when I first saw it, and I honestly believe that the coaching staff thought this might be an easier game and put in a sub-par line up to try it out and give some guys a rest. The experiment FAILED pretty miserably if you ask me.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know if you've noticed

But we don’t have Lionel Messi on the team right now. All of our players have trouble finishing, no exceptions.

I think Sigi’s been around MLS long enough to know that anyone can beat anyone at any time, and that Toronto, for all their problems, are usually hard to beat at BMO.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Messi isn't a Sounder?

damn….

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

you don’t need a Messi to win in this league, but you do need a solid starting XI. That’s all I’m trying to say. This line-up versus our traditional line-up leaves much to be desired. It has to be a factor in the loss, that’s all.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why?

Alonso and Marshall are part of our solid starting eleven. So is Evans, even if he was out of position today. All of our players waste too many chances. Look at pretty much any game starting from the second half of last season forward and you’ll see missed chance after missed chance.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

quit the Montero bashing already… the guy can score, plain and simple. His absence was a huge factor in the loss today.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

He didn't do much today as a sub

But the only real factor in today’s loss was the boneheaded mistakes.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

he wasn’t even playing his normal position anyhow. He could have had a goal there, if it weren’t for a great save by Friel. In any case, this sorry excuse for a line-up should be taken out to the back-yard and shot. I would not miss it if it NEVER showed up again, unless it’s a meaningless scrimmage…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

exactly… we better not have this line-up for Open Cup play unless we want to be eliminated early…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:22 PM PDT reply actions  

That lineup would beat most Open Cup lineups

at least in the first two rounds.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Answer me this… would you pick this line-up over our traditional one for future games? Would you honestly sit ALL of these players at once: Montero, Zakuani, Hurtado and Gonzalez? Who would you have in their place?? This line-up was a failed experiment, plain and simple.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lineup was forced due to fatigue and injury

It certainly wasn’t Sigi’s first choice.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

And more to the point, not a factor in this loss

The starters blew this one, not the replacements.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

so do you want to see this line-up again, with healthy players??

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sigi didn't have that choice

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

What do you mean??? The only player who was considered an injury possibility was Keller, and he started!! All the other players starting the Dallas game were healthy enough to be available as subs!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

You do recognize the difference

between starting and subbing? I don’t know that guys fit to play 15 minutes are automatically assumed to fit to play 75+

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 25, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

All FOUR of them though? Were so fatigued by Thursday’s game that NONE of them could start on Sunday?

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

You make it sound

Like Sigi tanked the game. If we had won on thursday, I could maybe see the tactics in sitting four starters. But do you honestly think he just sat them out of what? Spite? Being too clever? He obviously knew the team could really use the points.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 25, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

what I’m saying is that he took a risk with this line-up and it didn’t pay off. He was hoping to rest some of his better players, both due to perceived necessity, as well as perceived evaluation of the Toronto team. I’m saying that it was a mistake, and he’d probably agree. It’s not one you can prove as easily as missed clearances, but that still doesn’t mean its not a mistake.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

And the replacements did well, for the most part

Ianni was great, Wahl did fine, Sturgis actually played pretty, despite being marked for death, and Nyassi was a speed demon (he even got carded for being too fast). Vagenas should be retired (he 932, after all, poor guy), but he was the only new starter I thought did badly.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

But did they do enough to justify not having started the people they replaced is what I’m saying. Let’s say they didn’t score, would you really have been satisfied with the draw? YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME, to use a football quote… hehehehe

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

How do you know the people they replaced wouldn't have done worse?

We don’t know and can’t know. Maybe one of them would have given up a goal and gotten a red card.

Like I’ve said many times, the replacements were not to blame. If they were, you’d have some sort of case, but it was players from our best eleven that lost the match for us today.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can’t believe you’re still pulling for this line-up… which of those replacements would you like to see made a starter then? There’s a reason why they ARE replacements and aren’t starting the game! Yeah, anything is possible, but with your best people out on the pitch, you have the best chance to win, it’s just that simple!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

In light of fatigue and injury who would you have started?

Seriously

Zakuani and Montero weren’t fit. Noona, Hurtado and Fucito weren’t healthy.

So who woudl you drop and start?

The quick review is up. Let’s move the post match conversation there. Because the server is going to get cluttered.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think you understand this and you need to get it

You cannot play all your best players every single game, especially in the back half of a double after an intense first game. You think these guys are horses and they aren’t. We had to play the lineup we did because of the situation. This isn’t a FIFA game.

by Brian Floyd on Apr 25, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK fine, you rest some players, but you don’t take out four of your starters and expect to come away with a win. Wether by necessity or by choice, this is not in any ways a preferable line-up and I am confident it had at least some affect on the result, obviously! I’ll take my comments to the next section then…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry but i am frustrated and even more after todays crap (followed it online) If we can score with this line up i don’t know what will.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:33 PM PDT reply actions  

i meant can’t score

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is definitely NOT a scoring line-up… what can you expect with your top two goal scorers missing? And it’s definitely NOT a defensive line-up either, with Gonzalez and Hurtado missing… I honestly have no idea what kind of line-up it is, aside from a LOSING one.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Honestly, this lineup looked more fluid than we usually are

We dominated the game before Alonso gave up the first goal. After that we went into shock a bit and the second goal finished us off, but we looked good for about the first hour.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe if it would better if we had hurtado and Leo starting.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

bleh NVM. Probably should take a break from watching the sounders until i can no longer be frustrated.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

sports will always frustrate

but let’s just be honest about the blame.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I still could use the break though. It just getting to frustrated to even follow it either.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Possession

this lineup was all about possession

blaming the lineup means you didn’t watch the game.

3 STARTERS are to blame. Not Rotational guys. Not Substitutes.

This match was lost by Evans, Alonso and Marshall. No one else. Most certainly not by Sigi.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry but I watched the ENTIRE miserable game in HD. The line-up is a huge reason for this result. Evans was not playing his normal starting role, and I agree possession was a huge problem… but that involves the ENTIRE team. Alonso shouldn’t be the one having to clear a ball that deep! What we’re saying is that with our standard line-up, not only could we have possibly scored on missed chances, but we could also perhaps have prevented those defensive mistakes as well.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alonso does that kind of thing all the time

It’s part and parcel of being a defensive mid. He just did it incredibly badly this time.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

so did he do badly enough to justify sitting him during the next game? What I’m saying is that I can bet we won’t be trying this line-up next Saturday vs. Columbus that’s for damn sure!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course not

He played well for most of the game, and he’s far and away our very best defensive mid. But defense is cruel: one mistake and all your good work is wiped out.

As for the lineup, yeah, you’re probably right that we won’t see it next week, but that doesn’t mean it had anything to do with this loss.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

to quote the Shawshank Redemtion, “How can you be so obtuse? Is it deliberate??” What do you MEAN that the line-up didn’t have ANYTHING to do with this loss???

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alonso, Marshall and Ljungberg are all regular starters

The first two would still have been there to pass to TFC and Ljungberg would still have been there to whiff on his goals and send corners in to the shins of the TFC defense.

Evans played up front and whiffed his headers, but he’s an attacking central mid and gets those kinds of opportunities in a normal game too. Like I said, it’s the starters who cost us this game, not the replacements.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

but you still don’t think there could have been a different result had we had 4 of our regular starters in??

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

our bench is good, yes, but not as good as our starting XI. Yes, we’re missing Jaqua due to injury, and he’s a big factor. But you play that line-up against quality teams (with your starters healthy and available) and you’re not playing to win.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course it could have been different

But it wouldn’t necessarily have been better. Maybe we lose 2-1, or if we’re really lucky we draw 2-2, but any time you hand the opposition two goals like that you’re going to have a bad day. And the players who handed them those two goals would still have been there and in the same positions and maybe one of the starters we rested gives them a third goal.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

and just why did we hand them those goals? Why was the ball there in the first place? Alonso should have cleared that ball, and maybe Gonzalez would have been there to do it! If we would have scored early in the game, it would have been Toronto under pressure, and then we could have scored again! It could just as easily have been 2-0 Seattle… the Toronto goals came later in the game…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think you misunderstood

This lineup was about possession, and that part of things worked really well. We didn’t get into punt and pray in a serious way until the end of the match after it was essentially already lost.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I honestly felt that our possession during this game left a lot to be desired. There were quite a few missed and bad passes, as well as mistakes that gave the other team the ball, especially deep on our side.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

We always have plenty of missed and bad passes

We just had a lot less than usual this game. Pete Vagenas was insanely bad today though. I would have loved to have seen him come out today.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

maybe I was just frustrated by all the missing starters out there, but I felt a heavy feeling throughout the entire game, from the very start. It just did not seem like the kind of Sounders play that I’ve come to love these past two years… I’ll take equalizers in injury time, because that tends to be influenced by the refs more than anything, and at times it benefits us as was seen vs. KC. But its losses like these, where 4 out of our best XI are missing but completely able to play, that really frustrate me.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except that it wasn't the replacements who were the problem

It was two individual mistakes by starters who cost us the game. Those guys would still have been out there in the “normal” lineup.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

of course not, but what I am saying is that IF we can SCORE, those mistakes might not cost us as much, or even have been made!! So Alonso has to make a clearance in the penalty area, that’s pretty basic. Marshall made his mistake with most our players pressing forward due to the 0-1 score. Perhaps the ball wouldn’t be so deep in our territory as often with more of our starters in there!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

The experimental line up dominated the game up until the goal

And it’s not like our regular guys don’t miss chances like it’s going out of style either.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

dominated the game my ass. I don’t consider scoring ZERO goals as dominating ANYTHING. I’d rather have our starters out there missing chances, than sitting on the bench. Cause more than likely they will SCORE on one of those chances! It happened enough last year, didn’t it??

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yet did you ever see them make a line-up change this drastic last year?? Seriously, we scored enough to make the playoffs! And but for one or two more scores, we would’ve had the top seed! You talk as if we were dead last! Trust me, this team can do well enough if it puts it all out on the pitch… plus we’re getting ANOTHER scorer in the summer! We don’t need to SIT our best guys in order to WIN!

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure that if we went back we could find one or two instances

Fatigue accumulates and you have to rotate some times. I’d give your argument more credit if the replacements had lost the match, but it was two starters playing in their regular positions that cost us today. Sorry, but the lineup changes were not the problem today.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, dominated and did you notice I said "until the goal"

The Sounders were controlling possession and had create the most dangerous chances by far until that point. Which makes the mistakes all the more heartbreaking.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

What best will prove where mistakes were made...

… will be what the starting line-up for the NEXT game is. If this same line-up is chosen, or if either Alonso OR Marshall are taken out, then maybe I’ll not blame the line-up primarily for the loss. But that will NOT happen. I bet Sigi choses a more traditional line-up for the next game with both Alonso and Marshall still on the pitch at the starting whistle.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:51 PM PDT reply actions  

So you blame Sigi and not the players who made the mistakes

The lineup was odd. It had everything to do with the double and injuries, but to blame the coach in this case just seems to be fishing for marlin in Lake Huron.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Apr 25, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

once again, I’m not placing the entire blame on Sigi… but you can’t tell me that this, “ODD” as you put it, line-up didn’t have a large reason on why we lost the game? Do you really want to see this line-up again? It was a mistake, just like Alonso and Marshall’s … the line-up is a huge factor! If we had won, and scored several goals, I’d be the first to recommend giving it a try several more times… but we LOST…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 1:56 PM PDT reply actions  

I wouldn't mind this lineup again, actually

We produced some quality chances out of this, and we avoided punt and pray, which is something this team falls back on way too much. I’d sit Vagenas and put Evans back into central mid, and then scour the world for a forward who could finish.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

This game wasn't lost today

It was lost during the off-season, where no effort was made to strengthen the squad. In fact, this is a weaker team than we had last year.

We just don’t have the personnel to convert scoring opportunities into goals. Which is why you wind up starting the guys who started today.

Which is not to excuse the two little-league defensive plays that led to both Toronto goals.

by Angus Podgorny on Apr 25, 2010 2:04 PM PDT reply actions  

This game was lost when Alonso tripped on his own feet and gave the ball up to DeRosario

And when Marshall completely mishandled a pass and gave the ball to DeRosario again.

Other than Le Toux, this is pretty much the exact same team as last year. How are we weaker?

Take a step back people. This loss was basically down to two plays. This kind of thing could have happened which anyone on the field.

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who would have helped

Maybe I missed something, but we probably acquired the best available striker out there (N’kufo). Who else would be an improvement that was actually available?

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 25, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you talking abou this game though?

Because I would make a case that having Zakuani and Montero out there the full 90 would probably have helped us deliver on more of those chances, and having Hurtado and Gonzalez out there could have possibly prevented one or both of those missed clearances. That’s all I’m saying…

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

How could they have prevented the missed clearances?

By shoving Alonso and Marshall out of the way and cleared it themselves?

by CarlosT on Apr 25, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

then you wouldn’t mind seeing more losses apparently. Cause that’s what a line-up which sits FOUR of your best players does.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:05 PM PDT reply actions  

I know Dave said this, but it bears repeating

This lineup, whatever you think of it, was borne out of necessity. We had numerous injuries and I’m sure we can chalk Zak and Fredy’s limited roll to longterm decisions. You take away those two huge mistakes and ask Evans — a player being considered for the USMNT at one point — to finish and this is not a game we lose and is probably one we win.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 25, 2010 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

how necessary was it, really? Or was it chosen because they thought a Toronto team might not challenge them as much? I can just tell you that I would have been much happier to have seen at least two more of our four regular starters sitting out there instead of on the bench.

by SkycatF14 on Apr 25, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Apology

Would like to apologize for my behavior today. I’ll definitively be taking a break from watching/following the sounders and visiting the sites. It just the results/performance the past few weeks too much that i can take with the frustrations. Maybe one to two week break would probably be good.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 2:20 PM PDT reply actions  

You seem to handle it well, then

I wouldn’t call anything you said out of line. We understand fandom, after all. But don’t torture yourself, either. I know I’ll welcome your return.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on Apr 25, 2010 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

thank you. It just its more than just results rather than we get 0,1 point or 3 points its excitement of being able to enjoy a good game on performance of watch/following each game. Yes we got points in the past 4 out of 6 games. The performance isn’t up to where i can enjoy it. That’s why the break.

It just getting to the point I’m no longer excited and need the break. Its one thing if these were spread out through the season its another when its back to back to back etc of poor performance based on my own opinion. I’m still new to the sport.

by gstommylee on Apr 25, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Sounder at Heart is a blog about the Seattle Sounders FC, with occasional forays into Democracy in Sports, Roster Management, Soccer Statistics and Life in Puget Sound. We are not the actual Sounders blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Screen_shot_2011-06-01_at_1
Intensitivity Training
Small
For Parents of Girl Athletes
Small
Observations From the Sounders 1-1 Draw With the Whitecaps
Oshan_small
Details of Sounders-Santos Laguna Away Viewing Party
Art14532flashhome_small
In Defense of the Personal Pronoun

Recent FanPosts

Small
Espn FC Manager this year?
2334846872_d5a0828b89_small
Clink moving the Brougham End Jumbotron?
Small
Looking for playtesters for a soccer board game
Sounders_small
US vs. Mexico (Women's Soccer)
Headshot_small
One Mystery Trialist Identified - Andrew Vanzie

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sounder at Heart exists on Facebook - Like Us

Follow SounderAtHeart on Twitter

Sounder At Heart on Twitter

follow me on Twitter

Follow the rest of us on Twitter

Sounder At Heart (Site Feed)

Sidereal (MLS stats)

Jeremiah Oshan (top 10 soccer journalist on Twitter, Baby!)

Aaron Campeau (Villa, Mariners)

Dave Clark (beer, specfic, mideast)

Brian Floyd (all Seattle sports)

Nos Audietis (podcast stuff, snark)

Chris Coulter (photos, academy)


Managers

Tiny_dave_with_scarf_small Dave Clark

Oshan_small Jeremiah Oshan

Seattlesoccerscene_small sidereal

Nos Audietis Crew

Avatar_small Aaron Campeau

34429_1545274384801_1023267281_31528947_8121091_n_small dano_seattle

Authors

Img_0349_small malcontentjake

Small dennyoffside

Ravelry_logo_small Abbott Smith

Special1tv_o_small Timm Higgins