Three Questions about Real Salt Lake
Like last week the Sounders are facing another SBNation blog/opponent. I caught up with denz over at www.RSLSoapBox.com about Real Salt Lake, holders of the MLS Cup. By the way, this weekend the team gets their rings in a pre-game ceremony.
1 - RSL has had a core of players over the past 2+ seasons, are you seeing year to year improvements as they learn each others games?
It has been huge for RSL, the team that took the pitch in 2008 had over 20 new faces from the 2007 squad as RSL's new coach and GM built a team that would embrace the mentality of the team being the star. Once you find players willing to commit to that mentality and show the heart and passion to match their talent, you want to keep them around, the ability for them to know what each other is capable of allows them to take chances both on offense and defense, and that has made us a better team. It is that type of familiarity that allowed us to make two early subs in the MLS Cup and actually not drop off in performance but actually start to dominate the match. I heard RSL GM Garth Lagerwey once say that RSL wants great players who are good people, and that mentality has shown in the relationships of the teammates, how they interact with the fans, and mostly how they perform on the pitch.
2 - Rimando doesn't have the build of the typical keeper, but puts up solid efforts - how?
Nick is a cat, somewhere in his DNA are the genes that allow him to pounce on shots like a big cat. His reflexes are simply amazing, so when you combine them with his vision and ability to track the game, and his knowledge of the league and it's players, it makes him a top level keeper. I think if Nick were 6'2" there is no way he could make some of the amazing saves that he has made over the last few years, it is that incredible combination of a smaller frame, great vision of the game, knowledge of the sport and league, and reflexes that are catlike, that makes him who he is.
3 - Does the altitude change how opposing teams typically play Salt Lake, or is it overrated?
Most teams come in looking to slow the match down and will try to play long balls to their forwards in an attempt to not have to go full out for 90 minutes because the elevation does impact their play. For most players you see it about the 60th minute, they come out for the second half hoping to be refreshed but quickly find themselves sucking for air. RSL has taken great advantage of that with bringing in their creative offensive players to cause chaos on weary foes, it could be Andy Williams confusing them with his footwork and ball control, or Robbie Findley coming on late and defenders simply being unable to deal with his speed. I don't think a team can put up back to back 1 loss seasons at home without some type of advantage. Some places it is the heat, or humidity, in Salt Lake it is the altitude and fan support of their home team.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Altitude
I grew up not far from SLC in Wyoming and the altitude can definitely be a killer during extended phyisical activity. Pro athletes probably have a somewhat easier time than those of us not in that kind of shape, but coming from sea level, like the Sounders do, it’ll definitely be a challenge. I expect some early subs in the 2nd half and some conservation of energy at times.
Rimando has great feet
and a keen understanding of what’s going on on the field…. it more than compensates for his lack of size.
RSL will be tough on the road. The fact that Findley has been in a little bit of a funk might be just enough to get us a point out of this. I expect the Sounders to come out and play a very high energy game after the disappointing loss last week.
He has issues in the air
I used to live in SLC, and actually had RSL tickets for a couple of seasons before moving up to Seattle 4 years ago. I love Rimando, but the guy has some issues in the air (from what I remember). The Sounders really need to step up their free kick/corner kick efficiency. Olave will foul, so if the doesn’t swallow his whistle because its Ljungberg I think that could be the source of 3 points.
but then you would want 7
;)
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
That's probably true.
But three can’t really cover enough to be satisfying. I like the questions but know there are more to be asked.
I wish there was an SBNation blog for every MLS team. Will you find other bloggers for the other games? Buzz? Duane? Etc.?
Steve added four since I came over
and that’s just to MLS. He also added two general soccer blogs and 3 for the EPL.
More are certainly on the way.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
It isn't easy
To find people like Dave who is in this for the love of his team, too many bloggers are trying to “get rich” off of it, or start a blog and fall away when the find out how much time it takes.
I know Steve is looking for people who are a right fit for what SB Nation is all about, fans who love their teams and want to share that passion with others, not for their own glory or benefit but to lift up their club.
And your two questions would be?
Listen I know that Dave and I both love talking about our teams, so if you want to toss some more questions my way, I will do my best to answer them.
by denz on Apr 9, 2010 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
There's a reason why Dave's the blogger.
But what would you say RSL’s greatest/most easily exploited weakness is?
Wow, tough one
The biggest weakness is a hard one to exploit because it is so unpredictable, RSL has had a habit of lapsing during matches. They will come out flat and get down quickly (last year’s final match in Houston giving up 2 goals in 5 minutes), or play a great first half only to be outplayed in the second half. When RSL puts a 90 minute- on as you saw in both the Fire and Galaxy matches a 120 minute effort together they are almost impossible to beat. 2006 and 2007, saw RSL lose a ton of point by giving up goals after the 75th minute of matches, in 2008 and 2009 the turned that around and became a team that scored a lot of goals late in matches.
I think the poor road record was something everyone knew about, if you could rattle RSL on the road you could like get a result, but after the run last year in the playoffs of getting wins in 3 matches away from Rio Tinto, things may finally be changing.
RSL will on occasion have a mental lapse or communication issue in a dangerous position, if teams can capitalize on those before the team recovers it can make the difference between a win and a loss, those mistakes are coming less and less frequent as the team has built more chemistry over the last couple years .
If you had asked me this last year, I would have said that exploiting Chris Wingert’s runs forward, which used to leave huge holes behind him, was the best countering chance a team had, but over the last half of 2009 and so far this year that hasn’t been an issue.
by denz on Apr 10, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
So the team is unbeatable
except via defensive lapses? I find this hard to believe. No chinks? No weak spots?
With Seattle, we obviously have a finishing problem (though I don’t think opponents plan to rely on that to help them); we are not (in the past, ever) dangerous on free kicks, but can be on corners; we are vulnerable to counter attacks due to the numbers we push forward; Marshall (and sometimes others) has a habit of clearing into bodies, creating dangerous chances; we can slip into punt-and-pray; we struggle when teams bunker, unable to find the shot and/or the final pass.
These are all weaknesses that can be utilized by the opposition. You’re telling me RSL doesn’t have anything like this? We just have to hope for a lapse, and hope we can finish when it comes?
I guess we’re screwed.
by Cornchops on Apr 10, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 
















