USSF Admits Wrong Call on Montero Offside
At the Supporter Summit MLS and USSF admitted that they weren't doing enough to improve the standards of refereeing in the League. They continue to improve their ability to self critique having regularly called out their CRs and ARs for wrong calls.
In this clip, the AR incorrectly calls an attacker offside from a long, diagonal pass into the penalty area. This decision, takes away an attacking opportunity. Image 4 shows the relative closeness of the positions of the attacker and the second-to-last defender. This is a perfect candidate for giving the benefit of doubt to the attacker.
The AR is well positioned to make the call (as Image 4 illustrates) but must show restraint in raising the flag. Total concentration on the offside line and the ball (at the time it is passed by the attacker’s teammate) must be practiced
One bad call early in the match may have changed things, but I find this case unlikely to do so. It would have certainly helped in Goal Differential (Seattle has lost two goals now on bad calls admitted by the review) and if Seattle was at 10 GF in 8 played they wouldn't seem quite as inept.
Jeremiah noted this call in his deep look into the match by the way.
over 1 year ago
Dave Clark
2 comments
0 recs |
Comments
2009:DC United::2010:Seattle
Ha ha!
And, to beat you to the punch, I am all too aware that we may well be the Red Bulls of 2010.
Seriously though, this did happen to us last year. It sucks, because there’s nothing the club can do to fix things when MLS referees call a handball on a player who blocked a cross with his thigh (and whose hands were virtually as far away from said thigh as humanly possible). We were also offensively challenged last year, so these mistakes appeared all the more crucial. When you’re having to eke out close games to get your points, you can’t afford a blown offside call.
I've been impressed with this year's Weeks In Review
Last year, any controversial call that affected the outcome of a game was magically a correct call by the officials. This year, they’re getting much more into the techniques of officiating and they’ve been much more willing to expose incorrect calls and errors in judgment.
I think one factor that prevented them from being so open in the past is the belief that admitting errors would reduce their credibility. Instead, they’re improving their standing immensely by analyzing openly which calls were wrong, why they were wrong, and how officials can avoid those problems in the future. I’m now more hopeful that in time, refereeing will improve here in the US.

















