On the Heritage Cup
As you may or may not know, I'm a Bay Area native. So, I have an inherent interest in this fledgling rivalry with the Earthquakes.
I happened to be at last year's game at San Jose, and it was pretty obvious that the Quakes organization took the Heritage Cup at least somewhat seriously. The halftime entertainment included a celebration of the original NASL Quakes and there were mentions of the game's Heritage Cup ramifications throughout the program.
As you may have heard, Sounders coach Sigi Schmid had a little fun at the "rivalry's" expense. Here's what he told the assembled media today:
"Last year, I don't know how the Heritage Cup got decided because we played three games with San Jose, we won two of them and somehow they won the Heritage Cup. I thought if you win two out of three you'd win the cup, but they eliminated one of the games. So I figured we'd play these two games (this year) and then we'd decide which game we want to eliminate and then we decide who wins the cup (laughs). Sounds fair to me. It's not a big thing that has entered our minds at this stage, to be very honest."
While I recognize that he was joking, in case you were wondering the same thing, here's what happened: The two teams played three times last year, with two of the games being played at Qwest. In order to balance it out, one of those results was thrown out, giving the Quakes the victory based on aggregate score after their 4-0 win at Buck Shaw Stadium.
The Quakes, their supporters and Sounders supporters all got behind the rivalry last year. But it sounds like Sounders players were not entirely clear on the rivalry, and from what I understand the Sounders never fully endorsed it.
I didn't get a lot of details, but in talking to Sanna Nyassi earlier this week, it sounded like players may have been asked to sign something acknowledging their part in the rivalry this year which would also imply the organization is taking it a little more seriously.
In any case, Nyassi thought the game had rivalry implications either way.
"We are rivals because last year we lost 4-0 and it was so disappointing," he said.
My question is how big of a deal do you think this rivalry is? Next year, the Heritage Cup will presumably also include the Timbers and Whitecaps. Is there any value in entering the four-team rivalry as the standard bearer?
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Minor Trophy
It ranks up there with SuperLiga, with Western Conference Champion and the Cascadia Cup.
A year in which the Sounders win all three but don’t win the Open Cup, the Supporters Shield nor the MLS Cup will be a failure.
Minor trophies are fun, but teams that focus on them are the ones that don’t win the big ones. Winning this by accident would be best.
It will be odd when the Heritage Cup and Cascadia overlap.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
This could be cool
It might be fun if the Whitecaps and Timbers are included when they join MLS next year. Sounds like a similar setup to the old Voyageurs’ Cup (when Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver were all in USL-1, and it was awarded based solely on regular-season games), and that’s always had a large following up here. I don’t think Whitecaps fans really care about San Jose, though; the rivalry with Seattle and Portland is much more pronounced thanks to the USL history.
Editor of www.sportingmadness.ca and www.canuckpuck.com.
by Andrew Bucholtz on May 21, 2010 3:15 PM PDT reply actions
I remember being a little surprised...
When I saw this was touted as a rivalry game. It will be a lot more important, obviously, if San Jose stays good. I think the Portland-Seattle thing will always be strong, but the other ones will probably be more reliant upon the standings.
Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Cascadia will always trump Heritage
It actually has existed in recent competition due to the USL, where as San Jose only has the NASL connection.
The overlapping competitions will be quite odd.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Look at the heritage cup logo
I think it speaks for itself how legit the competition actually is. Wake me when the Timbers/Caps are involved, and when somebody hires an actual graphic artist.
Fair enough
Although, I thought this year’s poster was OK: 
Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2010 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow, didn't realize it was going to be that big...
Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Actually...
I take it back. Upon closer inspection, I’m not sure I like this poster much either.
Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions
More interested in the renewal of the Cascadia Cup
Feels like San Jose will be the odd one out next year. It will be strange that the winner of the Cascadia Cup will likely also win this thing.
by magistermilitum on May 21, 2010 10:18 PM PDT reply actions

by 













