Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Brad Evans: Unfairly maligned

Brad Evans' best work has come in the areas that aren't always immediately obvious.

Brad Evans has been on quite a roller-coaster ride during the season's first seven games.

It started off great when he scored what turned out to be the game-winning goal in the first match of the season. Over the next two weeks, though, his season took a dramatic turn for the worst when his marks scored each of the opponents' next three goals -- essentially accounting for a three-point swing.

He was relieved of starting duties in the Sounders' next game, but earned a bit of redemption anyway by getting the assist on Mike Fucito's stoppage-time game winner.

The next three games have been far less dramatic in terms of ups and downs -- he hasn't directly figured in any of the scoring. Still, the spotlight remains as focused upon him as ever. With the Sounders playing what has generally been considered their best soccer of the season, Evans' lack of production in relationship to his playing time and position would seem to be one area where the team stands to improve.

I have been one of the people coming to Evans' defense. After taking a closer look at Saturday's film, I can tell you that I get why people are growing inpatient, but honestly believe that the good continues to far outweigh the bad.  

Star-divide

The coaches seem to agree with my assessment. No offensive player has logged more minutes than Evans' 536, he has started all but one match and is one of six Sounders to have played in all seven contests.

"He did what was expected of him," Sounders assistant coach Ezra Hendrickson said in his assessment of Evans' play in Saturday's match. "From a technical standpoint, maybe he was a little bit anxious, but that's going to come. It was his first time playing that role (right wing). Overall, I thought he did really well."

Obviously, I understand that Hendrickson is not about to throw Evans under the bus, especially when talking to someone who he has never met.

That being said, he made it pretty clear that the coaching staff is looking for players that are versatile and willing to allow their roles within the team to evolve. Evans, perhaps more than any other player, has certainly been willing to do that. In just seven games, Evans has been a central midfielder, a target forward and an attacking winger. Going back to his time with the U.S. National Team, he has even played on the backline.

"Brad is very mobile," Hendrickson said. "Whether he's playing in the middle, whether he's playing on the wing, he's going to give you movement. On the wing, he's really able to use that mobility that he has. Fredy (Montero) and Brad were able to interchange (on Saturday). It doesn't matter who's playing what spot at what time. We need total mobility from all our players and need to have the ability to interchange." 

While that kind of interchangeability was always at a premium in the Sounders' system, it may be even more important as the team switches from what was nominally a 4-2-3-1 to what could accurately be depicted as a 4-2-1-3. With more players pushing farther into the other team's side of the field, the Sounders are potentially more exposed to an attacking wing-type player.

That means the players pushing forward will have to be even more willing to not only pressure the backs as they try to move the ball out of danger, but also must take some responsibility to help on the defensive side of the field.

Evans seems most suited to able to handle those kind of responsibilities.

A perfect example of that came in the seventh minute of Saturday's game. 

With Evans positioned all the way up to the edge of the penalty area, midfielder Peter Vagenas makes perhaps his only mistake of the match, floating a long pass from the left wing to the center of the field. The ball is intercepted by the Crew, and suddenly the action is moving in the opposite direction with Guillermo Barros Schelloto controlling the attack from the middle of the field. Schelloto plays the ball forward and to his right, before eventually getting it back. He then sees left back Danny O'Rourke streaking toward the goal and sends a dangerous pass his way. At the time, no one is between O'Rourke and the goal.

Just before O'Rourke is able to get a touch, though, Evans flies into the passing lane and deflects the ball to James Riley, who is able to tap it to Kasey Keller. 

The entire sequence takes about 11 seconds, meaning Evans had to change directions and run about 250 feet at a near sprint in order to make the play. 

That's also the kind of box-to-box play that is expected of midfielders. At least for the immediate future, Evans' role appears to be more of a forward, meaning that on some level he's going to have to produce on the offensive end.

None of the shots Evans missed over the past two weeks could be clearly classified as sitters, so it's probably forgivable that he didn't score on any of those.

What seems to have attracted the ire of some is the perceived lack of killer-instinct that we all want to see in strikers. One such example came in the 35th minute of Saturday's match. Freddie Ljungberg gets the ball in space and spots Evans making a seemingly unimpeded run toward the goal, and slides a pass his way. Evans gathers the ball at the edge of the penalty area with what looks to be a clear shooting lane. Instead of shooting it, though, he passes the ball back to Montero, who fails in an attempt to chip the ball over the defender.

Upon closer and repeated looks, I'm now convinced Evans actually made the smart play. While it may have seemed that he had a clear shooting lane, in reality he had a defender between him and the keeper. More importantly, the keeper had fully committed to Evans. In passing to Montero, Evans appears to realize that Montero is in a better position to beat the keeper. Only a perfectly executed sliding challenge -- from a defender who was behind the play -- keeps the ball from getting on goal.

Now, it could certainly be argued that a better pass from Evans would have allowed Montero to take a quicker shot, and perhaps not give the defender time to make the challenge, but I think it falls more into the excusable range in a similar way as his misses do.

None of this is to suggest that Evans' doubters are without evidence. I counted at least eight giveaways in Saturday's game -- meaning he was directly dispossessed of the ball or a pass he made directly or indirectly led to a change in possession -- and he was an unfulfilling 2-for-7 on 50/50 balls. By the time he was pulled in favor of Sanna Nyassi in the second half, Evans' effectiveness had obviously started to wane as the strain of three games in 10 days had started to take its toll.

I also counted at least seven other occasions where he made strong runs into the box, kept plays alive or made heady defensive plays. The vast majority of his passes -- 19 of 23 -- were on point. Those kind of contributions can't simply be overlooked.

Evans, for his part, strikes me as a pretty self-aware individual. Just look at the frustration he feels after missing a shot off a beautiful cross from Ljungberg in the 36th minute. There's just no avoiding the fact that the breaks haven't been going his way this year -- not so unlike the team at large.

"The idea that we're playing better soccer has motivated everybody," Evans said on Monday. "Moving forward and seeing how successful we were this weekend, once we get two or three at home, I think it's game over." 

 

 Evans, it would seem, is as good a candidate as any to be the player that sparks that turnaround.

Comment 22 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

unfair?

i don’t think Evans has been unfairly maligned at all. I, for one, have been very critical of his play because I don’t think he’s very good. just because he tracked back to make a defensive play doesn’t mean much to me. 8 turnovers! that is horrendous. do you know how many touches he had? 8 turnovers must be 40-50% of his activity. and i would bet that 6 of those came at a crucial point of attack. I have to believe we have someone with more skill available. it scares me that Hendrickson doesn’t see this. maybe Bradley will call him up again! send Evans to South Africa!

by chinsmd on May 4, 2010 6:00 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Actually, it was not nearly that high

He had at least 35 touches.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 4, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

And because you implied it

I think one, maybe two, came at a point in the attack that I would call crucial.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 4, 2010 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

all attacks are crucial...

maybe I’m crazy….i just think he plays like Levesque. lots of hustle, little offensive skill. I have higher expectations for a guy who’s played as many minutes. I bet Nyassi would be a much improved option if given 562 minutes. and now that we are looking at a 4-3-3, Nyassi should be up there with montero and Zakuani. if Evans is so good…. let him compete with the other midfielders.

by chinsmd on May 4, 2010 7:25 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Every player is going to have "turnovers"

I haven’t counted it up for everyone, but the attacking players are going to lose the ball … a lot. It’s the nature of their position. I’m not saying you have to fall in love with teh guy, but there’s no way Nyassi is going to fill the role in the same way. He might provide more speed and on-ball skill, but he’s not going to be able to do the other things Evans does at anyone near his level.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 4, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only issue I have with Evans

is his finishing. I suppose you could say that about just about the whole team, however.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens when we have a completely healthy roster if we’re in the 4-3-3. If Jaqua is the target forward and Montero on the wing, I just honestly don’t see Montero making the kinds of runs (either offensively or back on D) that Evans makes. OTOH, I’m not all that convinced that Evans will ever really be a good finisher. There’s a similar problem if Montero’s up front and Jaqua is on the wing – Evans is reasonably fast and used to making box-to-box type runs in the midfield. Jaqua really isn’t and even if he was wouldn’t be fast enough to make some of the defensive hustle plays Evans does. Any of the other options availabe – Nyassi, Noonan, Fucito, and Levesque – all have similar issues one way or another (well, we really don’t know enough about Fucito, I guess, but if he were good at everything he would have seen the field more by now).

I think Prost Amerika pointed out that some fans feel the need to continually find a scapegoat – it was Jaqua last season (and I was certainly one of the complainers and I’d certainly like to say now that I was undoubtedly wrong as we have seen this season) and this season Evans is the favored target so far. If he sits out for a significant length of time, I think it would change some peoples’ opinions like it seemingly has with Jaqua.

by Nevtelen on May 4, 2010 7:31 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

As soon as Jaqua is back

we will have to endure the same old crap.

by Cornchops on May 4, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because there is nothing worse than a player that scores goals

Especially on a team that doesn’t

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on May 4, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sigh.

Yes. That is most definitely the worst.

by Cornchops on May 5, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vagenas has perennially been the scapegoat as well

but from what it looks like people are finally starting to get on board the Vagenas train

by chrisperry1983 on May 5, 2010 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's different with Vagenas

People didn’t really like him, but I always got the sense it was less visceral.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 5, 2010 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

People will always complain about someone

As well as having different opinions of play.

I think Brad is playing extremely well, sans goals. The minute he came out of the Toronto game was the minute we folded up shop.

No one else is making the runs he is, and no one else can. Fredy doesn’t have the pace, and Zakuani doesn’t quite have the anticipation or vision (though he is definitely in the top two for our production, so he more than makes up for it).

When Brad makes these runs, it puts defenders on their heels. It opens up opportunities and space in dangerous areas. He isn’t scoring, but soon others will score off the rebounds from his misses, or he will score. And then maybe people will be quiet.

Actually, if Jaqua is any indication, they will never be quiet. But they might find someone else to moan about.

by Cornchops on May 4, 2010 7:34 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I was actually going to get into that concept

In terms of scapegoats, I think Jaqua and Evans make easy targets mainly because they were good at putting themselves in positions where their mistakes are magnified. No one notices if you just hang around the outside of the box and wait for chances to strike. You’re not being helpful, really, but at least you avoid the scorn of fans (yes, sarcastic).

Jaqua could very well replace Evans once he’s healthy, and I’m not making any predictions there. What I am saying is that Evans is probably the best suited player to fill the role they seem to want that player to fill right now.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 4, 2010 7:51 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Noonan should get another shot at it

once he’s healthy. We haven’t seen everything he can bring yet as he’s only played a couple of games and really hasn’t gelled with the squad yet on the field. He has had one poor miss, yes, vs KC, but who hasn’t on this team? He deserves at least a chance to show what he can do once that hamstring heals up. With both he and Evans a bit sore, I’d bet we see each for a half and/or maybe split time with Nyassi on Sat.

by Nevtelen on May 4, 2010 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

You might be right

I think Noonan will definitely get another chance to start. I don’t think the Sounders will continue to roll with three forwards when that time comes. Coaches have already said that there’s at least a decent chance that once the team goes on teh road, this offense may not be as good of an idea. I have a hard time seeing Noonan being asked to shoulder the defensive responsibilities that would come with a 4-3-3.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 4, 2010 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m going to have a fanpost about that.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 5, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

BTW, good point about mistakes being magnified.

Defenders probably have it worse in that regard, but as defending by and large hasn’t been an issue very often for the Sounders, the attackers have drawn most of the scorn.

by Nevtelen on May 4, 2010 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I complained about Evans after the Salt Lake match, but he has played well recently.

I think was can be frustrating with him is that he appears to be a talented player and so I expect a bit more from him at times than may be fair.

by Sec 108 on May 5, 2010 9:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Hustle != Touch

I’ve historically been an Evans fan. He works hard and gets himself into good spots on both sides of the ball. But being in the right spot just isn’t enough for what we need out of that position. Watching him very closely on Saturday, I was struck by two things:

1. He has no touch with his head. Anything that came his way in the air seemed to be a giveaway. I sympathize! I’m a terrible player in the air too, but anyone who’s even pretending to be a striker needs to be better than he is.

2. Holy giveaways batman. Unless Saturday is an absolute anomaly, he lacks the individual skill to maintain possession. In my (slightly liquor addled) mind, he gave away something like 4 of his first 6 touches for no good reason. Pressure or no, that is completely unacceptable. Put in Noonan, or our young Columbian striker, but don’t insist that hustle is a replacement for individual skill. We are about scoring and possession. And Evans is producing neither.

by silver00 on May 5, 2010 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Responses

1. You’re right. He had very little control in the air, which mostly accounted for that 2-for-7 on 50/50s.
2. I’m not suggesting hustle is a replacement for skill. This isn’t about how hard he’s trying. It’s about believing that his skills will eventually reward his ability to be in the right place at the right time. I wish I had marked varying degrees of difficulty on his giveaways in my notes, but I don’t remember very many of them being completely unforced.

Because if it's not Love | Then it's the bomb ... | That will bring us together

by Jeremiah Oshan on May 5, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Scapegoat

Agreed. I do clearly grock the point about putting yourself in the position to have your errors highlighted. With the idea being that if you’re putting yourself in more and better circumstances then you’ll eventually have better success. But at some point we’d be better off with a player who might put themselves in fewer good spots, but is more capable of finishing with that magic touch, and might also do less damage on giveaways. Right now there isn’t an easy sol’n to what we want out of that position, but to my eye, Brad looked out of his depth on Saturday. I hope he looks better in his next start.

by silver00 on May 5, 2010 2:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Sounder at Heart is a blog about the Seattle Sounders FC, with occasional forays into Democracy in Sports, Roster Management, Soccer Statistics and Life in Puget Sound. We are not the actual Sounders blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Screen_shot_2011-06-01_at_1
Intensitivity Training
Small
For Parents of Girl Athletes
Small
Observations From the Sounders 1-1 Draw With the Whitecaps
Oshan_small
Details of Sounders-Santos Laguna Away Viewing Party
Art14532flashhome_small
In Defense of the Personal Pronoun

Recent FanPosts

Small
Espn FC Manager this year?
2334846872_d5a0828b89_small
Clink moving the Brougham End Jumbotron?
Small
Looking for playtesters for a soccer board game
Sounders_small
US vs. Mexico (Women's Soccer)
Headshot_small
One Mystery Trialist Identified - Andrew Vanzie

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sounder at Heart exists on Facebook - Like Us

Follow SounderAtHeart on Twitter

Sounder At Heart on Twitter

follow me on Twitter

Follow the rest of us on Twitter

Sounder At Heart (Site Feed)

Sidereal (MLS stats)

Jeremiah Oshan (top 10 soccer journalist on Twitter, Baby!)

Aaron Campeau (Villa, Mariners)

Dave Clark (beer, specfic, mideast)

Brian Floyd (all Seattle sports)

Nos Audietis (podcast stuff, snark)

Chris Coulter (photos, academy)


Managers

Tiny_dave_with_scarf_small Dave Clark

Oshan_small Jeremiah Oshan

Seattlesoccerscene_small sidereal

Nos Audietis Crew

Avatar_small Aaron Campeau

34429_1545274384801_1023267281_31528947_8121091_n_small dano_seattle

Authors

Img_0349_small malcontentjake

Small dennyoffside

Ravelry_logo_small Abbott Smith

Special1tv_o_small Timm Higgins