| Sign Up | Google+
7

... formations are poor representations of on-pitch reality. We should be able to make predictions...

... formations are poor representations of on-pitch reality. We should be able to make predictions from scientific models, but formations do not provide sound predictions of players’ average on-field positioning. Whilst the processual activity of football is more complex and messy than a simple model can express, the model should still have some predictive scope. When we look at the above graphic, we see that the formation could perhaps be expressed as 2-4-2-2. The full-backs push on to be level with the central midfielders, with the centre-backs, based on Cartesian coordinates, essentially the only defenders.

This indicates that we do not apprehend player positioning merely based upon coordinates: we also assess the game with regard to the human significance attached to the use of space ...

Cartesian Coordinates or Dasein The WHY behind why we can't just use average position to come up with the formation and roles for a team. In World Cup news, Portugal is blowing out North Korea. Today is the final day of three match Group Stage play. Switzerland and Blaise Nkufo try to be the first European side to beat an American team in this World Cup. Spain also faces an American side as the late game. Consider this your open thread for Blaise Nkufo day.

There are 7 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5351_tracker