GameThread: U.S. takes on Ghana
With a win today, the U.S. Men's Soccer Team would advance to the World Cup quarterfinals for just the third time in its history -- and for just the second time since 1930.
Standing in their way is a Ghana team that now represents Africa's last hope for a deep run. So far, African nations have enjoyed little home-continent advantage with the six teams collecting just 14 points and none of them accumulating more than four during the group stage.
That Ghana has advanced this far can hardly be considered a shocker -- the Black Stars also made the knockout stage in 2006 -- but missing their captain and best player Michael Essien certainly makes this at least a mild surprise. So far, they've been doing just enough to get by.
Both of Ghana's goals have come from the penalty spot via Asamoah Gyan. Facing an Australia team that was playing with 10 men for much of the match, they only managed a tie. If not for the Socceroos' falling apart against Germany in the group's first game, Ghana's loss in the final group match could have proven fatal.
The U.S., as some of our European readers have pointed out repeatedly, hasn't exactly been dominant either. El Pais de Todo (that's supposedly what they are calling us on the Spanish-language news shows) drew an English side that has not looked sharp, needed to erase a two-goal deficit to salvage a draw with Slovenia and required a stoppage-time goal to dispatch Algeria.
None of that will matter after today. A win by Ghana will mark the longest run in its history and a win by the U.S. would tie their longest run since 1930. It would also set up a quarterfinal match against the winner of Uruguay-South Korea, and a reasonable shot at a semifinal berth.
All indications are that Bob Bradley will go with a similar lineup as he did against Algeria, with the lone exception being Oguchi Onyewu's return to the staring XI. Ghana has been playing what essentially amounts to a 4-2-3-1 and is expected to go with a lineup very similar to its other matches.
Thoughts From Dave - Rather than do two Gamethreads/previews I thought I would add my thoughts here. One of the things that should be noted is that the USA's offense is as good as everyone thought it would be. The Yanks have scored 2 goals a game if silly things like Referees didn't get in the way. But the defense has been as bad as expected, prone to mistakes in communication and in cases just a lack of skill the backline has given up a goal a game.
Whereas against Algeria and Slovenia we saw an up and down match with both sides attacking, today though we should see a slower match as the Black Stars have slowed things down while not controlling possession. The Americans also didn't control possession on average, but almost all of that was due to their countering strategy v England.
The Americans must not fall into playing a direct game and bypassing their midfield players. Landon must get his touches, and generally about 35 yards out or so. Breaking the crowded midfield will be vital. If they do use the punt and pray I expect it to go to Altidore or Dempsey with Landon running off of them.
By www.fivethirtyeight.com the USA is one of the least likely nations left to make the Semi-Finals, but that isn't because they are in a strong sectional, but because they are 50/50 v Ghana and Uraguay gets a lot of respect in Silver's system. Silver just updated for the most recent result and tweeted the following
fivethirtyeight Uruguay (#URU
) now with 14.7% chance of winning the Cup -- trailing only Brazil
The winner will face Uruguay after their 2-1 win over South Korea. The champions of the ancient era have finally been scored upon, and are the first South American side to make it to the Rd of 8 outside of Brazil/Argentina since 1978.
Today's game is bit. Two of the previous three matches in this World Cup have set records for viewership, and while this one may not challenge the USA v England 18 Million American viewers, I expect it will be close. Local radio will also have the match on 950 AM KJR Seattle.
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Findley returns to Starting Role
Bornstein stays. Clark returns.
More chances for MLS players to prove selves on global stage.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Jun 26, 2010 11:00 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Failure is NOT an Option
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Jun 26, 2010 11:28 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
How long until Team USA starts to play?
They just cannot focus to begin a game.
Much better spacing and patient patient passing now...
The goal was just an #EpicFail by 3-4 players….
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @QMcCall3
by Nate Parham on Jun 26, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Or defensively
Lots of standing and watching and getting caught flat footed
Whenever play shifts direction...
…it looks like we’re scrambling, clustering, and playing catch up.. not good…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @QMcCall3
Well, it seems that if we continue to try making individual runs...
…we’ll remain easy to swarm…
We’re letting them off the hook on that…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @QMcCall3
by Nate Parham on Jun 26, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
ghana implementing their possession strategy too well
USA may need to switch to direct play to bypass crowded midfield.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Jun 26, 2010 12:20 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Team USA seems very timid
They are being out-hustled and that doesn’t have anything to do with speed. Their passes have been weak, which has lead to turnovers. They are giving Ghana way to much credit for their speed and therefore, giving up way to much space.
The attitude of play is not what we expect from this team.
An awful performance
They were thoroughly out played. They were out-hustled, they had bad and/or weak passes.
This is some bad football from the US
You look solid enough around midfield, but it’s like no one on the team has any idea what to do once either goal is approached. Defense looks lost, out of position and giving away space. US attacks tend to die ugly deaths on bad long ball ideas.
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 26, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions
Beautiful passing to set up that last shot for Ghana.
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @QMcCall3
So close
This was the team that we should have seen from the first minute. But, none of this means anything unless they put it in the back of the net.
Wow, hit the post
But, it went in!!!!!! GOOOOOOOAAAAAAAALLLLLLLL!!!!!!
YES!
But where was this team the firs half? Will they ever play a full 90?
Now the game is deteriorating again...
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @QMcCall3
Altidore looks heavy legged
Is it Buddle time?
I should clarify that Gomez often came off the bench late in the Mexican league this past season
and scored goals quickly. So, he is very used to that role.
Well, the Sounders are back tomorrow.
It was a nice run for the US and this is a young team.
Yeah, and Landycakes and Buddle will be back for the game against us next weekend...
…and the U.S. Open Cup two days later (assuming the Sounders get past the Timbers). :-(
Ghana is the USA's World Cup nemisis
Twice in a row they have eliminated the US
Went to the well once too often
Wonder strike by Ghana and we just didn’t have another comeback in us.
Nice run boys.
Any chance US gets a new head coach. Sounds like to me that he was the one that screwed up US’s chances of moving on.
I hate Bradley as much as anyone
But I think it would be harsh to fire him after winning his group. Most of his moves worked, he just needs to learn that Feilhaber should be starting.
2014 is a long ways away...
…and any decisions would probably be premature until the dust settles. Who even knows if he wants to return (although I suspect he does, as long as his son is on the team)?
Not just Feilhaber
But the fact is that if in 3 of 4 matches the team gives up a goal in the first 10 minutes the problem is either on the selection of players, or the fact that the coach can’t get them ready to START a match, rather than react in the end.
I would love to see a coach that defaults to players that START for their pro clubs, rather than go with talent that doesn’t play.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
This is a great point
It has to be tough to start a match when you don’t normally do it.
by Brian Floyd on Jun 26, 2010 8:11 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It didn't seem to bother Kingson
The Ghanese goalie. He’s played only 4 matches for Wigan Athletic since moving there two years ago.
Man of the match, easily.
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 26, 2010 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions
On average would you rather have starters or bench players?
One player doesn’t make a rule.
What would you prefer. Talented players who rarely see the pitch, or less talented players who actually play?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Starting is usually a sign of quality, so that's a non-question
I was just saying, a good coach can sometimes see past the player’s status at his club to make sit/start decisions. It’s a sign of less skill in coaching if you can’t. So I don’t disagree with your assessment, just saying that a coach shouldn’t always start or bench players based on their status at their club. Shouldn’t default either way, but it is a major factor, basically.
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 26, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions
But two of those came from
Ricardo Clark falling asleep in midfield. When Benny was on the pitch, we didn’t give up those kinds of runs or really bad turn overs.
Interesting game
I can’t remember the last match when the difference between the two halves was this marked. Ghana dominated one, the US the other. Could have gone either way and no one would have blinked, but Ghana winning it makes as much sense as anything.
And that comes down to tactical play. Even when down, Ghana was still defending close to their men, and their offense was creative and frivolous in short bouts. I think the second 45 minutes of the US were excellent, and if held up for a full 90 minutes the US could beat a team like Ghana whistling, but the real weakness is not in that you can’t keep this up for 90 minutes, but your lack of tactical vision overall:
- Everything has to go through Donovan. He’s not good enough for that on a World Cup level. As evinced by his lack of creativity on a lot of passes, at one point I was thinking “man, if I was his teammate, and he did another one of those short low passes on obvious long pass situations (including corners), I’d punch him in the face” (to use the football poetry of Willem van Hanegem). I thought Bradley was a better player for much of the match, especially in the second half.
- The defending is archaic. No modern football league sees this much slow defending off the ball. Part of the reason this is a record-setting low-scoring World Cup is not just the 10-man-behind-the-ball tactic of many teams, but how disciplined and close to the man they defend. The US doesn’t, you made Ghana look much better than they are by the massive amounts of space given away
- The offense, especially later in the match, declined into a mind-boggling kick and rush tactic. Now honestly, I hadn’t seen kick and rush for years, not since the minorest minor leagues…until I watched some MLS matches. Might be one of the few leagues in the world where teams still play kick and rush, but so does the US, and it…well…has a very low chance of success.
Honestly, this does come down to coaching quite a bit, but also simply to the level of your players, which isn’t that high. But neither is Ghana’s, they’re simply better coached. As one of our pundits put it “It’s nice that they know how to run so much, but there’s too little thought behind the running.” Country’s heritage?
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 26, 2010 10:32 PM PDT reply actions
Also, 538 actually ranks England over Germany
Are we really supposed to take them seriously? Their methodology is…pretty bad.
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 26, 2010 11:45 PM PDT reply actions

by 


















