Seattle Sounders GM Adrian Hanauer: MLS Draft 2011 Was "Shockingly Fantastic"
Adrian Hanauer really sounded like someone who just won the lottery. You know that one birthday where it seemed like every present you opened was exactly what you wanted? Where you started actually getting embarrassed that people actually listened to you this time? That's the best way I could describe my one-on-one conversation with the Sounders' general manager and part owner.
Assuming we take him at his word, and I'm really inclined to since he sounded downright giddy, all five of the players the Sounders drafted were among their 23 highest rated. That's including the Darlington Nagbes and the Perry Kitchens of the world, who were their top 2. And this is despite trading out of the first round, and acquiring some extra allocation money to boot.
"It's a challenge, it's a puzzle," Hanauer said while addressing the general concept of roster building in MLS. "It's somewhat constraining, but it's also why we have great parity in this league and our teams are somewhat rational financially. There are lots of positive. There's something cool about having to find unique and out-of-the-box ways to compete and win that aren't all about spending money. I love the math part of it.
"Even the trading down thing was really risky, but we felt like the potential rewards were higher than the risk. We guaranteed some allocation money and still had our four picks in top 29. I'm really not kidding you when i say it was just a shockingly fortunate draft."
The Sounders started out by trying to move up in order to get one of the first five or six spots. Once that became impossible, the Sounders decided that their best choice would be to move down and acquire some extra allocation money as well as the Timbers' second round pick. Hanauer said the team was almost literally out of cap space prior to the draft, something the allocation money will help relieve.
Michael Tetteh, the UC Santa Barbara left back, was their first pick at No. 20. Both Hanauer and coach Sigi Schmid said they had expected him to go as high as No. 8 and were sure he'd be gone by the end of the first round.
"He's definitely someone that could play well," Schmid said of the soon-to-be 22-year-old. "He's somebody that can play left back and left midfield. As a left back, he's very attack-minded. He's someone who can turn the corner (as a midfielder). He can hit the ball, has good quickness, has good athleticism. He's going to battle on that side of the field. He is going to give us options and also helps us in terms of a flank player witht the loss of Sanna (Nyassi)."
Juan Cruz, who the Sounders took with the 21st overall pick that they had acquired from DC United last year, is another player likely to compete for time at one of the fullback positions. Servando Corrasco, who was the pick the Sounders received in the Freddie Ljungberg trade, is someone listed as a midfielder/forward but who the Sounders envision as more of a holding midfielder. But the pick that may end up being the steal in the draft was goalkeeper Bryan Meredith, who the Sounders got at No. 29.
"Meredith was our No. 1 guy," Hanauer said when asked if they had targeted No. 5 pick Zac MacMath. "We thought he had the best upside. He's farther along than any of the other keepers. He had enormous upside.
"Not everyone is always going to agree on that stuff. But we have a goalkeeper coach (Tom Dutra) we have a lot of confidence in and he had seen a ton of those goalkeepers."
The final piece to the Sounders' draft-day puzzle was Alex Caskey, a player who the Sounders did not know quite as much about, but whose rating by the Sounders was still significantly better than the spot where he was picked (No. 49 overall). Caskey will likely compete for a spot in the midfield and was lauded for his vision and passing.
Hanauer admitted that the MLS draft is far from a science. That just because his coaches and scouts rated the players they got highly does not guarantee success. But they followed their own blueprint and drafted players they had seen in person during games or at their private combine in Las Vegas.
"We're not going to get it all right," Hanauer said. "I'm sure that somebody will have found someone we didn't see or the guys don't work out, but all we can do is do our homework and cross our fingers. Now the real work starts."
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It sounds like the front office got the players they wanted.
Does MLS have a slotting system for draft picks (I expect they do)? What is the $ difference between the 11th pick and 20th?
Since Tetteh is a GA slotting is meaningless
He’ll be paid by Adidas
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I'm pretty sure they don't
The player makes whatever they work out with the team (except I think GA contracts are already set).
everyone picked after the first round is probably gettin minimum
There’s not really a slotting system. Plus, they’ve usually already signed with the league once the draft starts.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 13, 2011 6:57 PM PST up reply actions
To be honest, I'm still a ways away from fully understanding the way MLS does things.
But really, coming from an MLB perspective (which I know the best) all the other professional sports leagues seem more complicated.
MLS roster/salary rules would be tough on John Clayton
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Not really any good one-stop shops, but we can probalby answer your questions...
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 8:41 AM PST up reply actions
Well...
What is the 2011 cap?
Is it a hard cap more like the NFL or soft in the NBA where you can resign your own guys for higher amounts after so much service?
Do GA contracts count vs the cap?
What part of a DP’s contract counts against the cap?
Its where you start getting into GA or DP (or is there another type of contract?) that I always get lost.
OK, we can definitely answer all these
1. The cap is $2.67 million
2. I think you’d call it a soft cap, as teams can use these like nebulous “allocation amounts” to pay down particular players’ cap hits. For instance, the Galaxy and Red Bulls each had well over $10 million in salary last year and about five teams were over the cap, including the Sounders
3. No
4. Between $335,000 and $250,000, depending on allocation dollars
Hope that helps.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 2:10 PM PST up reply actions
It does, wow.
It’s a lot more straightforward than I thought. And each team I heard gets some money back from the league for budget/costs — revenue sharing? And allocation is money specifically for roster costs?
Thanks!!
Allocation money is given
for things like where you finish (teams who finish the season at the bottom get more) and being an expansion side. You also get allocation $ when one of the players you have under contract signs overseas (as a % of the transfer fee the league negotiates). Other than that, I’m not really sure. It’s kind of mysterious. So, right now DC and Portland and Vancouver have a lot of it. We seem to be pretty close to out.
we got
some from Portland in the trade yesterday.
250k?
i thought you can go lower that that for DP cap hit with allocation money.
The last report I read...
Said $250k was the lowest it could go. Earlier reports said it could be paid to 0, but this last one I read was on the Timbers official site so that’s what I’m going with.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 2:46 PM PST up reply actions
thanks
it makes sense for there to be a minimal cap hit.
Correction
I misremembered. Apparently, DPs can hit the cap as low as $150k. Sorry bout that.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 15, 2011 4:49 PM PST up reply actions
About a dozen seniors are pre-signed at slightly above minimum
And no one outside of first round will make more than that unless GA.
Ampai made a great business decision.
Some may even wind up with only Reserves contracts (33k v 42k)
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I am neither happy nor unhappy
To be honest, I do not follow college soccer, so I had not heard of any of these players beforehand. Generally, I know the players on the National Team, but not on the USA “U” teams.
I have read about many of these players the last month on this blog, Ives blog, etc, but I have not seen any of these players. So, the opinions that I have are from sportwriters, bloggers, etc.
Therefore, all I can do is say that I trust the front office, as there is not enough of a sample size (just two drafts) to say they are good or bad at picking players in the Superdraft.
I am really looking forward to training camp to open.
I don't follow college, myself
gug Tetteh is GA, so there’s no salary cap hit PLUS we got allocation dollars. With that, I’m very happy!
by PeterJH on Jan 13, 2011 7:38 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My thought is, if they're happy, I should be happy.
Thrilled we got a GA player in the 2nd round, allocation money, and a GK they’re high on. Can’t wait for the season.
Karma police, arrest this man.
by wyte_lightning on Jan 13, 2011 7:25 PM PST via mobile reply actions 2 recs
i think we got what we needed
i mean unlike other teams we were drafting to get starters we were drafting to get depth. and we got depth where we needed it.
yep
i agree this is exactly what i was hoping they would do.
I'm very intrigued.
I’ve heard great things about Tetteh and fills a hole we’ve had for the past two seasons. Will definitely give depth behind Zakuani and Leo.
Adding five players in the draft is adding much needed depth. After all, we will be entering another three competition season. We will need all the depth we can afford.
by Codemos on Jan 13, 2011 10:25 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
God,
I feel like such a troll. Among all these good vibes and optimism, here I sit feeling conflicted. Like a lot of folks, I was really hoping they’d package those picks and bring in a player who could have an actual impact on the first team (at least as a solid sub). Was never a fan of MacMath (actually, I like the player, but just don’t think he was worth a first round choice), so that worked out nicely from my perspective. I believe the allocation money was the big prize in this draft. I knew that we were likely butting against the cap, but I had no idea things were quite that dire. Soooo, you know, this was a “smart” move by the team. But I’m honestly not all that impressed by any of these guys. Of course, I didn’t think much of Fucito when we drafted him so. Heck, I’d never even heard of him!
If draft form holds, Tetteh will likely be a solid player for us in….. two years. One of the other picks will likely emerge in a way that surprises. A couple of the others will bounce around the reserve team, never quite pushing themselves into the big picture.
My take on our draft? It was okay, given the circumstances. While we didn’t necessarily get any impact players and likely never had any intention of trying to get one (I think the allocation money was always the most sought after prize), we got ourselves a player who most thought would go earlier and gave ourselves a chance of getting another down the road as they develop—that’s about as good as it gets in the draft, I’m thinking.
I think as American's we're used to getting excited for drafts...
When in actuality they’re such a crap shoot, that you’re better off ignoring them. Perhaps trading up was an option, but the cost was too high to grab someone who could only compete for first team time. I felt like my amateur take on things was the team could use competition at LB/RB, and Tetteh was one of the best ones available for that. We also needed GK depth. We got that. The other guys didn’t have media hype, but that doesn’t mean they suck. Soccer isn’t very huge in the US, and some talented kids go to smaller schools for a hundred other reasons than to go pro. All of our draft picks seemed to have prolific high school careers. Maybe there’s a season or two of good coaching away from making it.
If I’m wrong on all points, and all the players bust, I’m still not terribly worried, we seem to be able to locate international 1st team talent, and recruit them fairly easily.
Unofficial Sounder Fan Club President - South Dakota Division
Also
There is probably some advantage to drafting players who are underrated for whatever reason, they’re probably more coach-able, and easier to develop. Plus it relieves the pressure on our coaches to get them 1st team time, because they’re a marquee talent, whether or not the player is actually ready.
These players will develop, and get time when they earn it. And I’m willing to be they’re all happy to do so.
Unofficial Sounder Fan Club President - South Dakota Division
I'm not sure we have to ignore the MLS draft
just adjust our expectations. It’s not like the NFL and NBA drafts where players are expected to contribute right away. It’s more like the MLB draft where players need some time to mature and develop. Even a talent as fabulous as Stephen Strasburg didn’t go straight to major league baseball, he spent time in the minors. Conversely, Danny Mwanga, pretty much the consensus #1 last year, only started 17 games for a bad team. He came on as the year progressed, but clearly needed time to get his feet wet.
You will hear us on Brougham, you will hear us on Occidental, you will hear us on King. We are all around you, there is no escape.
Strasburg sitting in the minors was a financial decision...
But your point stands.
Unofficial Sounder Fan Club President - South Dakota Division
Okay
poor example, especially in light of his arm falling off.
And I should have made clear that I was attempting to complement the good points you raised, not arguing against one of them.
You will hear us on Brougham, you will hear us on Occidental, you will hear us on King. We are all around you, there is no escape.
I know, I said your point stands, its a good one.
I was just mentioning that Strasburg sitting in the minors was the Nationals holding back his free agent time clock.
Unofficial Sounder Fan Club President - South Dakota Division
I'm not sure there was a player in the draft who would make a major impact on the first team
By all accounts, Nagbe and Kitchen were pretty much the cream of the crop and would you want Nagbe starting over Montero or Nkufo? Would you want him to sub over Fucito or Jaqua? How about Kitchen – should be be starting over Alonso? He could have gotten time as a sub, probably, since we don’t have a lot of CDM depth behind Ozzie. Other than that, who could we have drafted to make an impact on the first team this season? Maybe Sarkodi, but we got a fairly solid player at the same position (who’s also GA) along with some flexibility. I just think you’re looking for something that isn’t there and never was.
by Nevtelen on Jan 14, 2011 7:18 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly
Now we have 5 guys who we can groom, versus 1 guy who would definitely cause friction. Also they mentioned that they did attempt to trade up. If the value isn’t there, you can’t get mad for the team not allowing itself to be fleeced.
Unofficial Sounder Fan Club President - South Dakota Division
Darlington Nagbe > Michael Fucito
I know you guys love Fucito, but come on.
by TheTank123 on Jan 14, 2011 10:32 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I've only seen Nagbe play a couple of times, but
I’d be stunned if he was better than Fucito, I think. Nagbe had a better college career, but now? I’m not sold. Talk to me in 6 months and we’ll see who the better player is.
Post later today on Tetteh
He’ll contribute this year.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
It'll be a good read
I’ve never seen the guy play, so everything I’ve heard is second hand. What I have heard is, tremendous physical talent (never a bad thing in a physically-based league like MLS) and that he’s tactically naive and tends to rely overly on his athleticism (flaws supposedly exposed at the combine). Those aren’t even close to fatal flaws, since nearly every college player drafted will find that things at the pro level are far more cerebral than they appear. I figured reserve team duty this season and some starting next season….. I’m looking forward to your take.
I haven't seen enough himself
just passing on some things from people who have seen him
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
My 2 cents
If you have a team that a draft pick can make a major impact on, you’re probably not very good (or an expansion side). The Sounders got guys that they hope can contribute minutes in non-league play and contribute to the first team down the line. If they’re right, I’m happy.
"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace R.I.P.
Also read as
If you have a top pick, you’re probably not very good (or an expansion side). Kind of a self-evident statement.
That said, Kitchens is GOOD. If you wanted to pick somebody from the draft that will make waves on the USMNT a few years down the road, let alone a team like the Sounders- he would have been a great acquisition.
Heavens knows we are capable of winning games even if Ozzy were ever to get hurt. I mean last year for example…
by Little old me on Jan 14, 2011 8:49 PM PST up reply actions
It would have been better
if Hanauer had said, “This draft was so good, it’s unbelievable.”
You will hear us on Brougham, you will hear us on Occidental, you will hear us on King. We are all around you, there is no escape.
by 108Ultra on Jan 14, 2011 8:56 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Adrian seems like he has a bit of CYA in his voice
as far as the draft goes. I think Tetteh and allocation was the biggest gain, but the rest are really just a shot in the dark. I would’ve loved to have traded up to get a pick in the top 5 but…oh well. At least one of our picks was GA.
I find his honesty refreshing
“We’re not going to get it all right”
Not many GMs in any sport have that kind of confidence. Usually after a draft it’s sunshine, puppy dogs and “we picked the right players and they should be solid contributors.” If you look at past MLS drafts as a whole, there are far more misses than hits. I’m not concerned at this point that the Sounders have a bad draft process.
You will hear us on Brougham, you will hear us on Occidental, you will hear us on King. We are all around you, there is no escape.
Totally agree
Also, I was thinking…maybe we’re just not in that bad of shape at all and we didn’t really need a ton of top talent? We’re fairly solid everywhere, aside from maybe left back and the hole that Sturgis left (assuming Evans is on shaky ground with the knee).
by chrisperry1983 on Jan 14, 2011 12:40 PM PST up reply actions
Sounders definitely tried to move up
Basically Hanauer said they were working the phones pretty hard trying to get a deal done before the draft and once it became apparent that it was going to cost too much to move up, they decided they were better off moving down.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
One of the things that I was surprised about is when they moved down
Many times you see teams move down when they are on the clock. The Sounders moved down fairly early. I guess they must have been afraid that the offer from Portland was going to go away. But in the end, I think they lost some of their bargaining power by moving so early.
Especially since Portland traded that pick later to Houston
I wish the allocation amounts traded were public. I’d love to know if Portland pocketed more allocation dollars as well as an international slot by acting as a middleman.
Portland also gave us their second-round pick, but didn't get one from Houston
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 1:11 PM PST up reply actions
I read it more than once that Portland received more in allocation than Seattle did
I guess the question is what is a top of the second round pick worth and what is an international spot worth?
I guess I should add that while I read that Portland received more in allocation
I have no way to verify if it was true.
No, neither would anyone else...
of all the issues I’ve talked to various MLS types about, this is the one issue that is most tight-lipped. I’d be amazed if someone got a reliable source on that to talk. For instance, many team employees don’t even know the allocation amounts.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jan 14, 2011 2:48 PM PST up reply actions
I'll Echo the good vibes
I don’t watch enough college soccer to know anything about these players but based on the positions they play we added depth and roster competition to needed spots. Tettah sounds really promising as a backup to Leo and future starter. Plus he is GA and excempt from the salaray cap and doesn’t have to be protected in the expansion draft.
I love that our team doesn’t have to draft for a starter. We have lots of good depth, which was seen in our Open Cup runs and hopefully will show up in CCL.
Long term success is the goal for me.
Tetteh adds more than just depth
I don’t view him as someone who is just a back-up for Leo because they’re games are so different. Tetteh provides speed and creativity going forward that neither Leo nor Wahl provides (I’m not sure about Earls). He’s a different look that Sigi can put into a game to change up tactics and formation.
Same can be said
Of slotting him on the wing. Not an everyday kinda move- but a good option to have around for say, holding a 1 goal lead against a team attacking primarily down their right flank.
by Little old me on Jan 14, 2011 8:53 PM PST up reply actions
Interesting response by Wright of the Rapids FO on why they didn't take Tetteh at 18
posted over on Burgundy Wave:
Q: The Ababio pick surprised a lot of people with Generation Adidas prospect Michael Tetteh still on the board. What put Ababio over Tetteh for you guys?
A: You know, we had a discussion about him and he was actually the other guy we were discussing taking with that pick. He had a very challenging combine and sometimes players come in and play in different leagues, you’re not sure of the quality they’re bringing to the new one. The coaching staff felt that Ababio showed much better at the combine.
Sounds like the Rapids put a lot of stock in the combine and weren’t that impressed with Tetteh’s play there. Or, I guess, that could be reading too much into it. Anyway, I’m VERY glad they passed on him.
I wonder how much the Rapids scout SoCal college games?
Because we know Seattle loves those.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
It almost seems as though that is all that Seattle scouts
In the end, I hope the Rapids loss is the Sounders gain.

by 
















