Sounders Defense Strong, But Area In Most Need Of Improvement
It isn't that Seattle Sounders FC's defense was poor, in fact is was quite good. The team gave up only 50 goals in all 48 competitive games for a 1.04 Goals Against Average. But there were two chronic issues - a weakness on the counter and probably merely average against set-pieces. Underlying the stopping of the opposition is a desire and recognition at the club to be better playing the ball out of the back. In Sigi Schmid's final statements to the broad media he pointed out when he wants from the defense.
I think our ability to play out of the back has to get better. I think so much of the modern game deals with the balls being at the feet of your outside backs. I think the outside backs' contributions to your offensive aspect of your team becomes important... I think we have got to get more shutouts.
Getting more shutouts means more points on the table. Seattle lost 4 games by a score of 1-nil (including one to Herediano). They tied 4 games at 1-1. Three of those eight potential standings changing results were in the first three weeks of the season. Of the 7 MLS games the Sounders gave up 15 potential points. Yes, Kasey Keller had an amazing season and more shutouts than anyone else, but in some cases that was because of him. Small improvements in this element of the game would push Seattle to the top of the MLS and CCL Group D table. Those improvements come primarily in cohesion and communication on the counter.
In April Assistant Coach Ezra Hendrickson pointed out that they want a regular pairing at centerback.
It is a position where we realize that it needs to be consistent. What we are trying to do is get that consistency, but of course in the first three games we tried to rotate. But we are trying to come up with what we think will be a pairing. Have we nailed that down yet? No.Still we are working on that. All the guys that have played, they are making it a difficult job on us. We want a pairing game in, game out consistently, but right now we don't have that.
They eventually found that ideal pairing for MLS matches in Jeff Parke and Jhon Kennedy Hurtado, but due to a few injuries they weren't locked together throughout the season, and expecting them to play 30+ MLS games together in 2012 is unrealistic. Left back featured the biggest rotation on the team. Tyson Wahl and Leo Gonzalez nearly split time evenly. Wahl made 26 appearances and 53% of minutes and Gonzalez 25 and 47%. Right back was locked down by James Riley who played 77% of possible minutes. Third on the team to only Alonso and Montero.
Having suitable substitutes that can step into starting roles is an asset that Sigi is used to having. Patrick Ianni slotted only into a center back role this season and while he didn't match the defensive skills of Parke and Hurtado he lent a bit more physical presence in his more than 2000 minutes played. Zach Scott mostly appeared as a shutdown man marker. In particular he owned Brek Shea and Sebastien Le Toux. Scott played in other games, but his insertion as a starter at either right back or center back was an indication of one of two tactical changes. Either an opponent was going to be marked out of the game, or Sigi was more concerned about giving up a quick counter than he typically is (see RSL Playoff Leg Two).
That softness on the counter featured in several practices, notably on August 1st when Sigi Schmid addressed it after the loss to the Houston Dynamo. He noted the generally strong defense through the season, but that after a turnover initial high pressure can be used to help the backline recover their shape. At that same practice Riley noted that recovering defensive shape was their biggest issue.
The origination of our defensive shape needs to get better, meaning our transition needs to get a lot better. We need to retain possession better when we do win the ball. At the end of the day it is up to the defense to make critical plays and we need to do that better.
While some of the improvement on the counter rests on immediate pressure from the man who lost the ball. It also needs to come from stronger communication from the second line of defense. Too often the fullbacks and Alonso would all be up the pitch at the same time leaving Seattle in a two man defensive posture on a long ball. If they fail to win the initial dual that leaves the team defending a 2 on 1 or 1 on 1 forcing Keller into situations where he must be amazing. Communication along that second line will help, but so would a more rigid left back rotation so that Alonso and Riley's familiarity would increase. The easiest thing to do would be to say that one less player needs to enter the attack, but that could result in fewer goals for by Seattle.
Transitioning To Offense
Seattle's worst game of the year (RSL Playoff Leg One) highlighted what can go wrong when a team turns into dump and pray. Where other teams excelled at putting pressure on Seattle through long balls, Seattle's offense was best when initiated by quick passes out of the back, through the midfield and into the potent Fredy Montero. Mixing in the long ball (see US Open Cup Final) definitely can work, but the ideal for the team is rapid passing up the pitch.
From Ezra in April;
... we've got to be better with the ball, and quicker at getting the ball to our guys in attack. Everyone plays defense and everyone gets in the attack. When we win it our transition has to be quicker so we can catch the opposing team exposed.Right now I think we are a little too slow when we get the ball at the back. We need to get it to the guys up top so they can do their thing. That's one thing we want to improve from the guys in the back.
That's a tough balance though. The short passing from the backline need forward outlets that are ready and available for the ball. If both fullbacks and Alonso are up the pitch there is little choice but to boot it up the field. If only one is back and there is a triangle the easy pass is sideways rather than forward. High pressure can force poor passing choices, the easiest way to avoid that is to have one more option.
This easy solution is also the easy solution for the issue with defending the counter. Here's the rub, it's a less risky, more defensive possession style. Rather than 8 men up in two or three bands moving the ball around, there would be only 6 or 7. A touch of scoring may be lost, but if through these changes Seattle gives up fewer goals and more quickly transitions to attacks through short and medium passes the style doesn't just continue to be fun to watch, it wins more games.
Sure, it's more fun in the off-season to dream of quality fullback being brought into the squad, or a behemoth center back displacing Hurtado. Hope could be hung on Hurtado finally fully recovering from his knee issues and returning to the quickness and form of 2009 as well. Any of those three things could happen.
They just aren't necessary. Small tactical adjustments and a 70/30 left back split could be all that's needed to turn those 8 missed shutout opportunities into 3 more successes and a Supporters Shield.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Healthy MF and Threats up front
Many of the Sounders woes related to the counter related to the compression of their attack to a band of play between the mf and 18. Alonso and the FBs cheated up to add pressure and then the team would turn over the ball at mf. This was as much a compensation of losing the offensive pressure exerted by Zak and Obw as well as the defensive stability provided by Evans when he’s healthy as it was the shortcomings of the defense.
A healthy Zak, Obw, Ochoa, Montero & Rosales stretch the field and force the opposition into a more defensive position on the field allowing moe time for the Sounders to recover and more ability for Alonso and the FBs to be selective. Having a true box to box mf pairing with Alonso could also help the defensive shape. It felt at times that both Friberg and Flaco had a tendency to surrender possession in dangerous positions.
The simple truth is that the Sounders have multiple options for moving forward as a team this offseason. The key will be where they opt to compromise and where they opt to gamble.
When you say "True Box-to-box Midfielder"
how do Evans and Friberg not qualify?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I think he considers Evans as qualifying
But considers Friberg and Fernandez as not quite strong enough defensively.
Yep.
Though I think that both could be strong enough if they work at it. For me box to box is more an attitude and mindset to the position than the particular skill set of a player. In Friberg’s defense, he has only been with the team for a year and is learning both the system and his team mate’s tendencies. Evans spent most of the season hurt and really only regained the pitch toward the latter third of the season. If he can recover his health (and isn’t exposed/lost to the Expansion Draft), he could return to form in a way that helps to shore up the defense.
And yes, I have been one of the more vocal elements of the Expose Friberg and Evans camp. I don’t dislike either player or what they bring to the Sounders. If they are still with the team, I won’t be upset. I simply think that the team could use the salary cap flexibility in the offseason.
You are right Dave in asserting that the team can make do with the pieces it already has by tweaking the tactical approach. There are points to be had on the table by tightening up the defense. The team can always improve by adjusting tactics and by helping the players to understand what is expected personally and systematically within the those tactical adjustments. The offseason and trading windows allow the team to adjust the personnel strategically. During this time of year, the team can also change what tools the coaching staff has to work with in terms of both individual players and overall roster balance.
This Sounders roster is capable of winning everything with a few tweeks. The truly wonderful aspect of this situation is that either tactical changes or player changes could work. What remains to be seen is what pieces the Sounders scouting is able to uncover.
by Abbott Smith on Nov 18, 2011 12:24 PM PST up reply actions
Hurtado will return to form.
He just has to! I’d hate having him displaced, he’s one of my favorite Sounders.
Riley the weak link?
He got burned constantly this season. I’d love to see a stat on how many goals were given up from his position. Maybe it was the concussions and he’ll play better next season.
Riley
Although his technique in the back was attrocious, I can’t say Riley is the weak link with Lefty Lucy on the other side. SERIOUSLY MAN! MY 2 YEAR OLD CAN USE HER OPPOSITE FOOT!
Sigi wants offensive production out of the outside backs and Riley(offensivly) looked ok esp when paired with the true League MVP. I am sure Rosales would make Jay Leno look good on the right side, but as it stands offensivly, Riley looked ok over there.
Hopefully the rumors are true and we get that left back, that will help significantly. Someone brought up that Flacco and others weren’t defensive players, they shouldn’t have to be. Unless you get burned on a bad counter 3 or 4 defenders back should be able to withstand an attack of 3 or less. What keeps running through my head is when Wahl got beat left side and Ianni or Park had an own goal.
If we have a D that can stand alone we will have more offensive pressure from the mids.
I'll conced that Riley helps with posession on the attack, but
does he really contribute to the offense directly? 0 goals and 2 assists on the year and he had close to the most playing time on the squad.
My only proetected defenders were Hurtado and Parke, so won’t argue about the left side.
Yes he contributes
Even though I would leave him unprotected, Riley does contribute to the offense. Probably the most telling moment of last season was during one of the games where Riley was not playing and Rosales tried to run a give and go with Scott. He dropped the ball back as if Riley were playing the position and then turned up pitch to move around the opposing FB. When he turned back around to accept the return pass his look of incredulity was priceless. Scott hadn’t budged and the ball was just sitting there for the opposing FB to scoop up with a butterfly net.
by Abbott Smith on Nov 18, 2011 1:31 PM PST up reply actions
Stats
How can we capture the weakness at the back? Shots per goals ratio? Shots on goal per 90? Saves per game? What’s the best way to capture what we all felt this year. That Kasey was under assault all year, but had a great year as a shot stopper.
Look at the passing success rate of other teams in the final third against us.
Probably the most accurate statistic. You can break that down into zone ratings as well.
by DaveValleDrinkNight on Nov 18, 2011 1:29 PM PST up reply actions
Chance to get some much-needed toughness and strength
Riley just isn’t strong enough or tough enough. We’ve got way too many guys who weigh 180 lbs when they are soaking wet. On another team, that had three other defenders wit some muscle, Riley might be acceptable. But this team desperately needs a physical presence. I’m sick of seeing us get tossed around by Dallas, RSL, Colorado, Philly, etc.
Bringing in two strong, tough outside backs who can fight off the strikers in this league AND who can lay a retaliatory lick or two when needed should be a priority for this team. A focus on upgrading the two outside backs enables us to leave our offensive core alone.
I realize, however, that this is easier said that done.

by 

















