Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

CenturyLink Field Will Get New Turf In February

Rubber pellets will still be a fixture of the CenturyLink Field turf, but at least the new stuff should be an improvement over the current situation.

There won't be grass, but CenturyLink Field will have a new turf for the 2012 Seattle Sounders season. The latest generation of FieldTurf will be laid down in February, shortly after the end of the Seahawks season and just in time for the Sounders to get used to it prior to their game against Santos Laguna on March 7.

Many fans have long pined for real grass, but the Sounders have only given us the faintest hope that it was a real possibility. With the University of Washington football team also using CenturyLink in 2012, a grass surface would have been nearly impossible to keep up even if the team had figured out a way to make growing it and maintaining it feasible.

At the very least, this FieldTurf should be an upgrade over the stuff they are playing on now. Players and coaches had grown to universally despise the surface at CenturyLink Field, which had degraded considerably since the inaugural season of 2009 when it was just a year old.

Star-divide

This is how the new turf was described in a release sent out by the Sounders: "The FieldTurf Revolution system is built with the Revolution fiber and is the result of innovative science, engineering and technology that will provide a playing surface that features a soft and strong monofilament fiber. A proprietary fiber polymer formulation resists splitting and degradation and includes an industry leading ultraviolet inhibitor technology. A state-of-the-art extrusion process provides intricate concave and ridged construction to eliminate breaking points in each fiber blade.

"Specially sized cryogenic rubber particles and washed silica sand granules are layered, in a patented installation process, surrounding the Revolution fibers. This provides player safety and outstanding durability and longevity. The FieldTurf system is the only turf product in the world with independent long-term and real-life safety data backing up its claims."

Comment 59 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Makes sense

There isn’t enough of an off-season to install the drainage system and whatnot to put grass in.

I wonder if there’s a quid pro quo with the Huskies to allow the Sounders to play in Husky Stadium for a month or so in the future in case they do want to try grass or a turf/grass hybrid in a few years?

by Jack Brando on Nov 22, 2011 11:51 AM PST reply actions  

Press Release

Whose idea was that to release that garbage in a press release ?

It is like reading the ingredients on a junk food label. You have NO idea what they are talking about, but you know it is not natural.

by Charles J on Nov 22, 2011 11:52 AM PST reply actions  

I don't think you're meant to eat it

From my selfish perspective, the only thing I care about is if they can get the gridiron field markings off for our games or not.

by Fnarf on Nov 22, 2011 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Field Turf

Here is the link to the Field Turf web page describing the new turf.

by MurrayD on Nov 22, 2011 11:52 AM PST reply actions  

that is all great

But the real question is… Is ours better than the Timbers now?

:)

by lysander on Nov 22, 2011 12:08 PM PST reply actions  

I think the real question is, “What’s Portland going to whine about now?”

Go banana!

by Disco_Stew on Nov 22, 2011 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I can see why you dislike the rat tail

He did score a brace in your house with it. But yes, I agree, you will always have something to whine about.

Go banana!

by Disco_Stew on Nov 22, 2011 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

our team is still better than theirs.

if they want a turf award, they can have it.

by jayw913 on Nov 22, 2011 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

This should have been done last year

After the weather we’ve had the last few days and an NFL season, obviously FieldTurf is the only option. I would rather play on plastic than the pitch at Red Bull Arena during their play off game.

Go banana!

by Disco_Stew on Nov 22, 2011 12:14 PM PST reply actions  

It is notable

The Glass House down in Portland has a two star rating. That’s the highest rating FIFA gives for artificial surfaces. A new surface here should be able to get that as well.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Nov 22, 2011 12:41 PM PST reply actions  

FIFA rating...

As has been pointed out to me elsewhere, we’re still quite a long way away from a rating.

The new FieldTurf Revolution hasn’t been lab tested yet (the first step), so until that’s done we don’t know if the 2-star rating is even possible. (I assume it will be)

Then the field itself needs to be tested.

I don’t see that rating coming anytime soon.

by Dylan Vanderhoof on Nov 22, 2011 12:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Two different kinds of turf

FieldTurf Duraspine Pro vs. FieldTurf Revolution

Portland installed “FieldTurf Duraspine Pro” which was the highest quality FieldTurf offered at the time of installation. Seattle will be installing FieldTurfs latest and greatest offering, the brand new “FieldTurf Revolution” system.

The differences between the two systems are described here.
http://www.fieldturf.com/synthetic-turf-products/

by Kiliman2004 on Nov 22, 2011 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

portland turf

Everyone was raving about it at the beginning of the season, but didn’t it deteriorate quite a bit towards the end? I remember hearing some pretty negative comments about it the last couple months…seems like all these artificial turfs are hard pressed to stand up for even a season and a half.

by elkvision on Nov 22, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Natural turfs wear down easily too, if unmaintained

See Livestrong Park (and the Home Depot Center, for that matter).

I met a possum.

by s0merand0mdude on Nov 22, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh man

i remember watching a SKC home game on ESPN and oh man the field was terrible. Divots everywhere and big ones too.

by gstommylee on Nov 22, 2011 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

LA got rain for the Cup

and the field there definitely fell apart. Seattle’s weather and two American Football teams playing in the Clink make grass undoable this coming year. I for one am excited about this announcement. It will be a HUGE improvement and genuinely represents the best we can do for now.

by exSlacker on Nov 22, 2011 1:44 PM PST reply actions  

There are quite a few:

Miami, Tampa Bay, and Pittsburgh come to mind.

Another quirk about Seattle: it has a lot of rainy days, but it actually has less annual rainfall than many cities east of the Mississippi. Most of the precipitation is in the form of light rain or mist rather than flash storms that you’ll get in the Midwest and South. Fields get torn up when they get super-saturated in a heavy storm, don’t have the capacity to drain the water out quickly, and don’t have the root structure to keep the field together.

This is a long-winded way of saying that Seattle is an ideal city for growing natural grass for a professional sports field.

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

they run multiple high school championships, college football, and pro football

Like I said, three events in a weekend once a month isn’t easily repairable. Six events over a weekend will kill the field. Pittsburgh is notorious for running as many people (and collecting as much money) as possible.

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Heinz field is consistently the shittiest field in the league.

Only Soldier Field compares.

It only supports the idea that so much use is a very bad thing.

by Agent_J on Nov 22, 2011 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Any grass in CenturyLink would be starved for sun

Both because of the constant cloud cover and because of the design of the stadium. The field would only see direct light for a max ~6 hrs each day assuming no weather-related issues.

by Agent_J on Nov 22, 2011 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I've seen a whole field demolished and completely reconstructed in less than three months before under normal construction conditions.

The issue is the establishment phase for the turf. The longer the better, and four months is ideal. That’s generally not practical. I see I had an incomplete thought on my post. It should read. “Unfortunately the MLS season runs through the prime growing season, so SoundersFC see about playing the first 3-4 games on the road to allow the field time to establish itself in March.”

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Even

if its do able the one issue is we have potential 1-3 CCL games between march and April so its not gonna happen unless let say Seattle has an alternate stadium to use which at the moment there isn’t one.

by gstommylee on Nov 22, 2011 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Simple solution.

Stop being so good and let other MLS clubs in the CCL!

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 3:07 PM PST up reply actions  

It won't happen this year,

but Husky stadium will be freshly renovated the next time that the turf comes up for potential replacement.

Sounders 'til I die

by SounderJunkie on Nov 22, 2011 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

It's possible that the Clink carpet was defective

There is a lawsuit going on between Fieldturf and a supplier where Fieldturf claims the supplier was giving it inferior polymer for the plastic grass starting at least in ’05. http://www.scribd.com/doc/50114371/Fieldturf-TenCate-lawsuit If that is the case, then there probably is a settlement/discount involved here. I suspect that is why they went with Fieldturf, and not Polytan, which is what they have up at BC Place.

by Brougham Hooligan on Nov 22, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Grass isn't magically good

There are plenty of crappy grass fields (see Steelers, see Sporting, see Dynamo, see Galaxy). I want the best field with the circumstances of this field. There’s no way grass could have been done for next season.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Nov 22, 2011 2:59 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I never said it was magically good.

I’m just saying it can be done.

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Not

by march. You can not rush a grass pitch. The grass needs to take root into the ground and that will take a time.

Dave, when Seattle’s president said it gonna take 8 months to install grass does that include letting the grass become fully rooted before using it?

by gstommylee on Nov 22, 2011 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Seattle has a window from early January to early March

Every year. That’s it.

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart

by Dave Clark on Nov 22, 2011 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Is it possible to make temporary arrangements elsewhere in the metro area?

Again, I’m not anti-synthetic. I will defend synthetic fields until I’m blue in the face in several instances. I’m just saying the Sounders are clearly an instance where natural grass would work, and it doesn’t take eight months for establishment. Four months is a good number, but it can be much faster with the right design and cooperative weather. The issue is you have to wait for final frost to install the sod, which I believe would be around mid-March in Seattle. That means half a season, but in the end getting a top-notch field plus USA-Mexico games is a nice payoff.

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

"Is it possible to make temporary arrangements elsewhere in the metro area?"

No. At least not until Husky Stadium is done, and I see a dramatic change in the surface (grass or different synthetic) as a distinct possibility once that happens.

by Aaron Campeau on Nov 22, 2011 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Not during the Husky Stadium renovation.

It is really the only other reasonable option. Once it is complete (for the 2013 college football season), it would be a completely reasonable place to play during a remodel. That is what the Seahawks did while Qwest was being built.

Sounders 'til I die

by SounderJunkie on Nov 22, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

One other issue with grass is the other events that take place in qwest.

It occasionally hosts dirt bike competitions, boat shows, conventions, etc. All of these things would cause a lot of wear on true grass.

Sounders 'til I die

by SounderJunkie on Nov 22, 2011 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't

see 4 months being enough time to get everything that needs to be done and have the grass be fully rooted maybe 5-6 months but still with out knowing what needs to be done to the ground and the stadium itself. 8 months might not be so off.

by gstommylee on Nov 22, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I totally agree on the superiority of grass versus artificial

But one question that seems not to be addressed is that in the fall months we share the field with a football team, and as far as I understand, on grass it would mean that we would have the gridiron markings on the field.

by AAAA on Nov 22, 2011 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We all WANT real grass, but the question is whether or not it is truly viable right now.

If grass was something they saw as viable right now, I wholeheartedly believe they’d do everything in their power to make grass happen. Whether it’s because of the stadium’s current schedule or because of the basic practicality of growing grass in that building, they’ve decided to wait. And I’m okay with that, because I’d rather they played on a two-star turf field for now than trip all over the travesty that was SPKC’s field this year, or try to play on what passes for a football field (read: mud pit) in Pittsburgh.

by Agent_J on Nov 22, 2011 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

@ J. Schnauzer - as you seem to be very well informed ...

What is your opinion of the hybrid surfaces where natural grass is reinforced with synthetic strands? It seems like lots of EPL teams are using it (similar weather) and a couple of NFL teams have quietly started using it as well (although with very different weather – Denver and Philadelphia). The product is called DD GrassMaster. Do you have any experience with it?

by exSlacker on Nov 22, 2011 7:47 PM PST reply actions  

I've seen it, but never worked with it.

I believe it’s a good option, but I would imagine it’s more expensive to install. I would assume the drawbacks on it are the same as natural grass in terms of CLink: the grow-in time for the grass.

Bloggin' at JoePasDoghouse.com

by J.Schnauzer on Nov 22, 2011 8:11 PM PST up reply actions  

How many years of unrequited love before people stop pining away for grass?

I appreciate the devotion, but it seems like a lot misspent angst.

by Steen on Nov 22, 2011 11:37 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Sounder at Heart is a blog about the Seattle Sounders FC, with occasional forays into Democracy in Sports, Roster Management, Soccer Statistics and Life in Puget Sound. We are not the actual Sounders blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Twitter-icon_small
Fredy Montero with magic at the death vs. the Whitecaps part 1 (animated)
Small
On "fake turf" in Seattle, 2012 edition
Small
Andy Rose!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sounders go after Drogba, yes or no?
Img957001_small
Substitute +/- Ratings
Twitter-icon_small
Fredy Montero mesmerizes Whitecaps' Joe Cannon (animated)
Acerimmer_small
Eddie Johnson Scores on Michael Gspurning? Yes indeed!
Paraguay_small
Sounders #awaysupport
Small
What's our line-up vs. Dallas?
Gopher2_small
2012 MLS Team Salary info VS Performance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sounder at Heart exists on Facebook - Like Us

Follow SounderAtHeart on Twitter

Sounder At Heart on Twitter

follow me on Twitter

Follow the rest of us on Twitter

Sounder At Heart (Site Feed)

Sidereal (MLS stats)

Jeremiah Oshan (top 10 soccer journalist on Twitter, Baby!)

Aaron Campeau (Villa, Mariners)

Dave Clark (beer, specfic, mideast)

Brian Floyd (all Seattle sports)

Nos Audietis (podcast stuff, snark)

Chris Coulter (photos, academy)


Managers

Tiny_dave_with_scarf_small Dave Clark

Oshan_small Jeremiah Oshan

Seattlesoccerscene_small sidereal

Nos Audietis Crew

Avatar_small Aaron Campeau

254350_1953423628277_767159_n_small dano_seattle

Authors

Img_0349_small malcontentjake

Devlin_small sum anon

Small dennyoffside

Ravelry_logo_small Abbott Smith

Special1tv_o_small Timm Higgins