CM passing skill - Evans vs. Friberg
Editor's note: Bumped to front page for general awesomeness. Though I've disagreed with the author on this subject our conclusions are the same. - Dave
On several recent occasions in SounderAtHeart comment threads I have found myself buried in discussions over the relative passing abilities of Brad Evans and Erik Friberg. Although one or the other player will commonly receive the favorable comparison on these pages, the debate remains largely subjective with only the most general passing statistics brought to bear. When Dave last assembled pass completion percentages, Evans held a 4.4% advantage over Friberg. If one were to simply take this measurement at face value and favor the former then one would similarly disapprove of the passing acumen of Mauro Rosales, Fredy Montero and Alvaro Fernandez, each having completion rates as weak or weaker than the Swede. An unsurprising conclusion: pass completion varies with player role, inviting the question whether Friberg and Evans truly share a role in the Sounders' 11...
Subdividing the passing statistics by pass type and directionality is our readiest means of assessing role apart from the position of the players on the field. A cross is more difficult to complete than average, while a lay-off is easier. A pass forward encounters more potential defenders and is far more prone to interception than a pass back. The chalkboard data at MLSSoccer.com provides us with a rough measure of pass direction. The chart below provides a summary of the last 4 regular season games in which Evans or Friberg served alone exclusively as the CM pairing with Osvaldo Alonso. Direction was split into 45 degree octants, merging the forwardmost 3 and the backwardmost 3 (e.g. a "forward" pass covers the area 66.5 degrees "east" and "west" of "north" where N designates a pass directly upfield).
These four games cover roughly 142 passes for Friberg and 151 for Evans. The analysis specifically excludes head passes and throw-ins in an effort to characterize distribution tendencies strictly with the feet. Putting a value to the graphical representation, Erik Friberg passes the ball forward more than 16% more often than Brad Evans. The difference exceeds the game-to-game variability of either player (1 standard deviation of forward pass percentage is about 6 for Evans and 12 for Friberg). A back-of-the-envelope calculation would suggest, in a 40 pass game, Friberg would miss a couple extra passes and successfully advance the offense forward with his feet about 5 times more.
So who is the superior passer? Leaving aside the problem that we need additional analysis to make the above statistics more robust (a more comprehensive data set for both Evans and Friberg, a discrete analysis of pass completion rate vs. direction, and some measure of the difference in positional role over the course of a game would all be helpful) we clearly need some measure of value for a completed forward pass (as well as the negative value of a failed pass) which largely depends upon the team in question. Adding in headers makes up a significant amount of the difference in distribution between the players (one role that Evans clearly plays is to contend long aerial midfield clearances by the opposing defense and send the ball back into the offensive third... or the offensive flick-on header), but this is not precisely a measure of passing skill when on the ball, Evans' forward headers have a tendency to be unsuccessful passes, and Evans' absence from the field simply means that other players would contend the same ball if possible (Fernandez, Neagle, Alonso).
Therein lies the rub. Distribution clearly shows that different styles of play are expected from the two CMs. One or the other would likely provide more to the overall play of the team dependent upon other personnel on the field (for both teams) and a level of "form" that exhibits a high degree of variability from game-to-game. The difference in passing success between the two players falls well within the variation one would tentatively expect from the difference in role. Referring to Evans' as the superior passer is clearly not strongly supported by the statistics we have available. We need further study to truly compare them.
If, instead, one would like to make a strictly subjective argument in favor of one or the other player with respect to passing skill, have at them.
Finally, the difference in role somewhat complicates the question of which player (if either) should be protected in the coming expansion draft. Evans and Friberg are not truly redundant with one another. However, both have styles of play which contribute to the team overall. It is difficult to state which play style is more important at the present time (harder still to project it for next season's roster). My commonly stated opinion is that Alvaro Fernandez (or Mauro Rosales) should shift over to the center midfield upon Steve Zakuani's return to allow our top 4 midfielders on the field at the same time. The difference in value between our (prospective) 2nd CMs is not great enough to justify a protected spot. I stand by that opinion.
FanPosts only represent the opinions of the poster, not of Sounder at Heart.
19 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
totally
agree. Nice work! I was stressing about these guys but since we can only lose one I would protect neither.
One question: because Friberg is an international, don’t we HAVE to protect him? Or is that on a per contract basis?
Depends on Tetteh's status
If the league decides that Tetteh occupies one of the necessary protected international slots through his GA protection, then the team can leave Friberg exposed. If Tetteh is deemed to not occupy a slot, then the team will need to protect a third international player after Mauro and Flaco. In this scenario, Friberg becomes the likely candidate.
Tetteh
My understanding is that Tetteh is not eligable for the draft as a Gen Adidas player.
that's right...
…but the question remains whether he still counts on the list of (minimum 3, in our case) protected internationals even though he is automatically protected (and doesn’t count toward the protected 11). The letter of the rule doesn’t explicitly answer this question one way or the other.
True but...
Yes, Tetteh’s GA status protects him automatically from the Expansion draft. But Tetteh also occupies an International roster spot on the Sounder’s roster. The league requires teams with as many Internationals as Seattle to protect no fewer than 3. The question is how does Tetteh factor into this rule? He is both a GA and an International. The ideal scenario for the Sounders is if he counts toward the protected 3. Effectively this gives the Sounders more flexibility. Otherwise, they will probably have to protect Friberg by default.
Thanks and Thoughts
Thanks for the analysis. I’m glad that you are attempting to elevate the conversation to an objective comparison.
Couple of questions:
1. Does the data indicate where on the pitch the player was making the passes from? If for example Evans is tending to play 10 yards further up the pitch then this complicates any discussion of forward or backward passing. A back pass from yards down field could still effectively apply more offensive pressure because the entire action is further up the pitch.
2. Are there any statistics on what happens immediately subsequent to the passes? A forward pass to a player who is surrounded, may indeed be successful but not accomplish anything. Likewise a higher percentage of poorly executed forward passes that result in the other team gaining dangerous counter attacks may negate a higher forward completion rate.
3. Another useful variation in this discussion may be to look at how the passing relates to overall ball possession. How often does each player gain possession, lose possession and how do their passes link into extended runs of possession or do they contribute to a short term possession. For example, after a successful pass, how many more passes do the Sounders make before surrendering possession?
Ultimately, I think that the Sounders and the fans would prefer to keep both players and the flexibility that their different styles of play and assets bring to the team. They enhance the Sounder’s ability to rotate personnel both tactically and for decreased wear and tear in a congested schedule.
But the expansion draft rules create a very tight decision making process and these two players may simply fall victim to the fact that they provide a hedge against one another and the team can only lose one player through this process.
(I personally believe that the Sounders season showed the value of thinking beyond a traditional ideal Starting 11 mentality, so I don’t think of the comparison of Evans and Friberg this way, but rather strictly in terms of the expansion draft.)
unfortunately not...
on #1, charting pass direction tends to be time consuming enough without adding in more detail (I had originally wanted to diagram each pass more or less individually… maybe before I spend too much more time on this I should just check and see whether the raw data for the chalkboard display may be obtained in any form at all, since they clearly have the info available). Another interesting question is whether Alonso’s backpass rate covaries with the CM pairing (i.e. does Alonso simply take most of the responsibility for sending the ball back to the defense when Friberg is on the field).
On #s 2 and 3, pass success is definitely dependent upon hold-up play. MLS does keep and publish the numbers on players tackled with loss of possession even though they don’t link the event to the entry pass. One step this question prompts is to simply look at the tackle/possession loss numbers of the forwards with each player on the field. Over the full course of the season w might be able to determine whether one or the other style of play leads to more possession loss on the sounders.
I think we can all agree we’d be very happy to have the option to keep both players on the team next year. The midfield depth at MLS-average or above is clearly the single most important reason for Seattle’s success this year.
but I enjoy excessive toil and error-prone estimates!
check that… I’d be more than delighted to pick your brain on the subject. Best means is through your website contact?
Expanding on your #1
I’d also be interested to see which player fails to complete more passes in the defensive third, or when 6+ players are in front of them.
One more thing to try an normalize for may be surface. If one guy got his last 4 full games on grass or good turf vs at Qwest it could probably skew things a fair amount.
by mrbs on Nov 7, 2011 4:27 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
#2 might be partially answered by +/- shots and goals
I know those data have been posted here recently but I can’t remember Evans or Fribergs +/- stats. Great idea for analysis
End of Season update was recent
Evans was higher in shots +/-, goals +/- and passing in the offensive third on the year.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
and here's the link
It was sitting right there in the sidebar – there’s too much useful information on this website
Evans at 1.79 and 0.63 vs Friberg at 1.11 and 0.37 for shot and goal +/- per 90 respectively. For comparison Alonso was at 0.84 and 0.51 and Flaco was at -1.06 and 0.34 so I’m not sure how useful these particular metrics are in establishing who’s a “better” player.
The number of international players which need to be protected still complicates this matter
Friberg is pretty clearly the 3rd-best international on our roster and we need to protect at least three. Maybe Tetteh counts towards that, maybe he doesn’t.
unfortunately true...
…and then still another inconvenient complication is the salary cap. Evans and Friberg both made significantly more than the youngsters on the bubble, at least by the protectinator standards. Leaving aside any negotiations surrounding the Montano loan, the Sounders are going to have a lot of reasons other than strict personnel evaluation for choosing the final protected list.
I'd guess that they'll have to protect Friberg (by default as the 3rd-best international)
And that will more or less force them to expose Evans, and they will comfort themselves by saying Evans has had injury troubles and is making enough money that he won’t be a desirable expansion draft target. That’s my guess anyway.
Thanks for the promote!
I hope to extend upon and improve this work a bit in the future. Hopefully in the long run it will provide some decent insight.

by 


















