Sounders Alliance End of Year Meeting Recap
When the Alliance Council asked for a larger role in the planning and execution of the End of Year Business Meeting the goal was for a more streamlined event, less repetitive Q&A and an increase in participation overall. On those three goals we probably got 2.5 right. This recap is built from the team's official live blog, my tweets from backstage and my memory of the event.
First off, I think it was important that all five MLS era trophies the team holds were there. No matter the prestige of the Heritage Cup, what it represents is still worth noting. It's also great to note that Seattle has won six trophies in their three MLS years (2010, 2011 Heritage). Compare that to the zero combined wins by the Portland Timbers and Vancouver Whitecaps in their inaugural years. Adrian Hanauer and Joe Roth both noted that the lack of MLS Cup on that trophy table is a failure by the team, one that will be rectified soon.
As a member of the Council the most important thing about the event were meeting the previous goals and the result of the ratification vote. It passed with an overwhelming 96% of the vote and would like to echo acting President Paul Cox' appreciation of everyone involved in any way.
Moving on to the meeting specifics;
Majority owner Joe Roth, minority owner Drew Carey, Council member Tom Challinor and a season recap video set the stage for the overall meeting. The focus of these first 15 or so minutes was inspiration, vision, celebration of past success and yet a demand for future greatness. Later mixed into the detailed reports were speeches by Sigi Schmid and Kasey Keller. Schmid had a line that got huge applause;
This is just another example of what makes Seattle so unique. So special. And why I've never regretted the decision to come here.
Keller got even larger applause. I think that was because he's Kasey Keller.
The report from the Council noted the passing of the Constitution and Charter, enabling stronger input on gameday operations and non-business or non-soccer operations. It also publicly noted the resolutions supporting the club's attention to the US Open Cup, suggesting a scarf design contest, against artificial noise and a request for expansion of Cascadia Away Allocation.
Gary Wright was the voice of the business side of the team. Things are going quite well as the team exceeds all expectations in tickets, corporate partnerships and merchandise. Wright also noted that the team is already past its goal for 2011 retail sales, this with a few weeks left of sales. The number one focus of the business side of the team is to get as many people in CenturyLink as possible to watch the Sounders face Santos Laguna. He noted that studies still reveal that grass is not an option at this time, but that Field Turf will be updated on a faster pace so it is the highest quality possible in every year.
When Adrian Hanauer took the stage he noted that most of the roster changes were in some way planned, or at least planned for ahead of the occurrence. He reviewed the additions of Michael Gspurning and Marc Burch and then to thunderous applause noted that Mauro Rosales and the team finally reached an agreement of at least two years. A significant portion of time was dedicated to the Academy (they play this weekend) and their early successes which include 5th place nationally for the U-16s and seven call-ups to youth national team camps or rosters.
The Academy was one of the ways he noted that a team can gain competitive advantage in MLS. Other areas noted were facilities, sports sciences in training, statistical analysis and scouting. Along those lines the team is not just hosting a Vegas Combine this year, but is also participating in a combine in Trinidad to evaluate Caribbean talent. He said that the goal in roster management this year is to have a deep and balanced roster of probably 29 players who can contribute in the many competitions.
Being on stage for the Q&A probably clouds my memory a bit. The guy who talked about why the Council is dominated by Supporter Group members was pretty good though. Within the next 24 hours or so the team will be posting a video of the Q&A, since Gaschk couldn't blog every answer while also managing the twitter submissions you'll have to wait until that is posted. The ending though asked what the team would do differently based on the evening's feedback.
Joe Roth took the mic wanting to answer. He promises that the club will evaluate the way it adds noise and pomp to the games, include the Alliance in the design of the 3rd kit in some fashion and that Hanauer will be up for a retention vote in 2012. Adrian and Gary both affirmed those while noting that they do want to find ways to increase participation in Council and Alliance voting.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dave, it can not be said enough:
You and company, do a really excellent job with this site.
Not only am I so fortunate as to get to support the Seattle Sounders FC for the rest of my life, but the joy of that experience is enhanced all the more by the remarkable work you all do with Sounder at Heart. I know there is us, the rest of the community, to thank as well (thanks everybody for making this such a fun, lively, and enlightening “place”), but none of it would exist without those of you who have made this site a reality. And so to you I say…
Thank you!
by bago'juice on Dec 14, 2011 4:54 PM PST reply actions 14 recs
Speaking of Heritage Cup...
Are we going to see Montreal join the competition? If so, would that draw Vancouver and Portland in?
I met a possum.
People in charge of Heritage Cup are in discussions with Montreal
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
Cool.
I was kind of thinking they wouldn’t view them as “legit” since they joined NASL at a significantly later time than the Sounders and the Earthquakes.
I met a possum.
by s0merand0mdude on Dec 14, 2011 8:44 PM PST up reply actions
Wait...
The Wikipedia page does not list the Impact as a NASL team in th 1970s or 1980s.
The first incarnation seems to have emerged in 1992. They played in the APSL in 1993-1996, in the A-League in 1997-2003, in USL-1 in 2004-2009, in USSF Division 2 in 2010 and in the NASL in 2011.
But surely that 2011 stint in the new NASL does not qualify the for the Heritage Cup? :D
What gives?
They're not NASL
The question is whether an A-League team is enough, and I’m guessing the Heritage peeps will be willing to expand the definition to keep the trophy relevant.
Nos Audietis
Talking about the Heritage Cup
with an unbalanced schedule, is it as meaningful? It could happen that a team wins it (theoretically) because they happen to have a preponderance of home games vs the other teams. Yeah, that might be a bit of a stupid question from a fan of a team that has played 75% of their USOC matches at home, but just sayin’… Why would Montreal even want to jump in given the fact it’d be pretty hard for them to accumulate enough points to win it. Or are they going to change the competition somehow?
Ooh, didn't think of that
The fact that Montreal is in the East while everyone else is in the West (I say everyone because I think the Timbers and Whitecaps would join with Montreal) would certainly make things…interesting. I’d have to think that they would find some way to make it work without being crazy. Perhaps they’d only count the latest game, like they did in 2009 (except it was the latest two games, but you get the picture).
I met a possum.
by s0merand0mdude on Dec 14, 2011 10:08 PM PST up reply actions
Rest assured
The Timbers will never join and the Whitecaps probably won’t either.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Dec 14, 2011 10:20 PM PST up reply actions
Why would they
it’s just another cup for them to lose.
by B Money on Dec 14, 2011 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
So next year the Heritage match would be decided based on three matches
Sounders vs. Montreal (not known whether this will be played in Montreal or Seattle)
San Jose vs Montreal (not known whether this will be played in Montreal or Seattle)
Sounders vs San Jose (which one of the three would be picked?)
Yeah, I don’t think anybody is going to care next year either.
Did Toronto choose not to partcipate in the Heritage Cup?
The Metros-Croatia were around in the 70s. I was lucky enough to see Eusebio score an amazing free kick goal at Soccer Bowl 76 in the old Kingdome. I didn’t think of the Heritage Cup as a voluntary thing, in all the discussion about the us vs. San Jose chats it somehow never occurred to me that Portland and Vancouver were never part of that mix. Just seems really odd that more teams from the old NASL choose not to participate (TOR, VAN, POR) than the teams vying for the cup.
despising Portscum since 1975.
Toronto did not maintain their NASL history in anyway
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
My bad for not reading the link
“The Heritage Cup is intended to celebrate the history of American soccer by being contested “between Major League Soccer (MLS) teams named after their markets’ North American Soccer League (NASL) predecessors” (via Wikipedia)."
Still it seems to me the cup would be better with more teams participating and create a deeper link to the NASL and soccer history in the USA.
despising Portscum since 1975.
Video is up
Is it just me or was the guitar riff from the music during the season montage a rip off of the song Kitty by the Presidents of the United States of America. Or are they involved a little bit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMRaSXh9-n4
Hey Dave, I might have misunderstood, but it seemed like you said more questions were answered on the website
I’m specifically talking about my Cascadia gear question. Is there a link you could give me?
We haven't gotten the other questions answered yet.
There were about 50 questions (including similar version) that didn’t get answered live, but will be soon.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
At the minimum
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
Sounders Alliance Voting
Hey Dave-
I don’t think this is the appropriate venue to ask this question, but I will anyway – and if it should be asked somewhere else, please let me know – but do you know why the alliance votes are by season ticket holder vs. seats? Talking for myself, there is a group of ~30 of us who go to every game together, but only about 3 or 4 actual accounts. Why can’t all of us individually be represented by our votes? I know, of course, that you have no control over this matter, but perhaps you could shed some light as to why this is the policy? Thanks so much!
(i’ve read that the constitution changes that, i guess I don’t see that stated explicitly!)
by Rob Scherzer on Dec 15, 2011 2:50 PM PST up reply actions
I love questions I answer by not speaking
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
by Dave Clark on Dec 15, 2011 4:09 PM PST reply actions 1 recs

by 






















