2011 Soccer Tools Review: Outfield Players Lost
Last year we started a project to talk about players based on their tools. The idea was to get an outfield position neutral judgement of players based on seeing how they behave on or off the ball when the team either possesses or defends as well as how they use their physical attributes. The scale is an average starting center midfielder set at all 6s while a replacement level player would be straight 5s. Centerbacks and Forwards are least likely to be around those center points as they are the most specialized of roles. The tools are Technical Ability, Tactical Judgement, Offensive Skills, Defensive Skills and Physique.
As recently stated the Seattle Sounders off-season loses didn't hit the core hard. When the writers here filled out our tools database based off of the many games we watched, including Reserve Games the losses seem less significant. Two of the players no longer on the team didn't get rated by enough writers as they were only featured with the Reserves. What maybe more surprising though is that none were rated as league average. Not Erik Friberg not James Riley, not Tyson Wahl. All were players rated at better than replacement level (a player that can be readily found through US lower division, draft or cheap international signing).
|
Player |
Role |
Technical |
Tactical |
Offense |
Defense |
Physique |
Average |
|
Friberg |
CenterMid |
5.8 |
5.8 |
6.8 |
4.5 |
5.5 |
5.68 |
|
Wahl |
FullBack |
7 |
5.3 |
5.8 |
5.5 |
4.5 |
5.62 |
|
Riley |
FullBack |
5.3 |
4 |
5.3 |
5.8 |
5.5 |
5.18 |
|
Noonan |
Forward |
5.3 |
6 |
5 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
4.86 |
|
Jaqua |
Forward |
4.4 |
5.8 |
4.4 |
4 |
5.4 |
4.8 |
Rating Erik Friberg, a man with nearly 30 starts as a central midfielder so low is probably a surprise. His non-scoring related statistics were fairly strong. As a slightly more forward CM without being a true CAM his lack of defense is directly related to his weakness with on-ball defense. This wasn't a major part of his game and there is little evidence that it was expected to be. He was also particularly weak in the air and many times was unable to use strength or speed to gain advantages in MLS. Just judging him as an offensive player he was more than adequate, but as a complete CM he failed to make the measure.
Fullbacks' ratings tend to be similar to a CDM. They are expected to get into the attack on occasion, but their primary role remains defense. With Wahl we see a hole in the system as his on-ball offensive skills were stronger at longer ranges, but at shorter distances he could be prone to mistakes. His on-ball defense was weaker than his on-ball. Those two sentences are captured in Technical, Offense and Defense. In some ways the authors here may see Wahl as a box-to-box left mid where his defensive ability is less of a liability, but he doesn't have the speed to be more of a danger offensively, nor does he use his height well. That may have a relationship to his use as a dead ball specialist. Wahl could be described as a poor man's Brad Davis.
James Riley statistically is a very strong passer yet did not contribute to additional offense being taken. He is rated most harshly for positional awareness as he often behaved more like a right mid than right back. His shorter passing technique led to a lot of success, but not as much danger as the authors desire. While somewhat speedy he could get knocked off the ball by many left mids. His defensive displays tended towards the spectacular - either a brilliant recovery through a sliding tackle or a mistake that led not to chances, but goals. He also had the greatest dispersal of observations with even split between average MLSer, replacement level and "needs to be replaced."
Both Nate Jaqua and Pat Noonan ended the season as after thoughts by most fans. At times they were the focal points of anger over roster selection or on-pitch performance. Unlike other forwards on roster both had skill sets that lends them use in the midfield. Neither displayed a special ability with both veterans lending a team veteran presence more than great passing, positioning, shooting, speed, height or strength. With both being just under replacement level talent their experience in the league may help other teams, but not at the cost that Seattle would have to pay to keep them. There will be little debate over their ratings.
Miguel Montano is still quite young. He's clearly not done developing. What he wasn't doing was showing it on the pitch while wearing the Rave Green. Since not enough of the authors saw him to share an average here are my ratings only;
Technical: 8 - Great flash with ball at feet
Tactical: 4 - Prone to positional errors
Offense: 8 - Pretty interchanges with Montero
Defense: 3 - Little effort and easily beat
Physique: 6.5 - Kind of fast, needs to fill out
Taylor Graham also was infrequently seen. And so only my ratings are shared. The largest shame about Graham's MLS Sounders time is that when he was at his peak he suffered from prolonged injury.
Technical: 5 - Solid on ball
Tactical: 8 - Great positioning
Offense: 2 - Poor passing, no longer danger on set-plays
Defense: 6 - Could be beat too often for a CB
Physique: 6 - Still strong, but lacked speed & could be exploited
Even if players like Friberg, Riley and Wahl were underrated by the five voters by a full point on average they would not be in the core. Friberg and Wahl would have been just outside while that exercise would move Riley to a league average player.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know why...
but I felt that Friberg’s role was more of that of a facilitator, just a cog in the machine. A role which I felt he did well and wasn’t really required to contribute in many other ways. I don’t have statistics and I’m sure the sample size was small but It seemed to me that when he was on the field our offense performed more smoothly (which seems to be the teams focus) and was more productive.
He had a very high shots +/- per 90
But you said “just a cog” doesn’t that imply average?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
No, I didn't mean
It quite that way. I almost look at him as a literal cog (shouldn’t have said “just a cog”) I saw him as an outlet for players to pass to and in turn his job was to quickly pass along to the next player. This in my opinion kept our midfield moving along and kept opponents on the move. His lack of defensive prowess was probably accepted by the team because he’s backed up by Alonso.
It seemed when Evans played in Friberg’s place this entire philosophy went out the door and we reverted to route 1.
by Adam Waltering on Dec 28, 2011 10:46 AM PST up reply actions
full list?
Do you have a link for the score of the remaining sounders players?
This is part one
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
Swapped Graham's tech and off numbers?
Don’t think he was an 8 on offense :)
yes
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
Off topic
Sigi is saying that Zakuani wouldn’t be back till late next year or early 2013:
Don’t want to push it, etc……then: “So we’re looking the end of 2012 or even 2013.”
Link?
That’s a huge difference from the last conference call I was on with Sigi
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
To me it sounds like
back to form
not
back at all
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
Disagree
It’s tough to predict when I see him being able to get out there and play in a 11 versus 11 game.
He’s not even talking about having Zakuani play a full game vs being a bench contributor, he’s just talking about Zak participating in a match at all. I guess it depends on what you define ‘back to form’ as. This news is not surprising, but I was hoping for better.
Recessionproof since 2009.
Then protecting him in the Expansion Draft was stupid
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Follow @bedirthan Dave's Twitter
You're right
Both Adrian and Sigi have made it quite clear they expect him to be ready to play, but not a regular starter until late in the season if at all.
Friberg's defense
Only thing I disagree with is Friberg’s defensive rating. Obviously he’s no Honey Badger, but it seemed like within his role, he still won a lot of balls and was able to turn around counters on quite a few occasions.
Anyway, love the deep analysis stuff as always.
But he also created a number of counters against the Sounders as well
Defensively, Erik’s biggest liability was his turn over rate in dangerous areas of the pitch. It seemed at times like he had an uncanny knack for giving up the ball on the Sounders half of MF. I loved watching him play, but sometimes it was an adventure.
by Abbott Smith on Dec 29, 2011 8:59 AM PST up reply actions

by 



















