Heiner Mora To Sounders Moving Towards Truthiness From Rumor?
Current Saprissa and Costa Rican right sided player Heiner Mora-to-the Seattle Sounders rumors are shifting from "just another rumor" to "hey that sounds legit" based on his latest interview with al Dia. Both he and the President of Saprissa are quoted in the story as saying that an offer is on the table. Now, there have been a handful of players who have been quoted as signed with the Sounders that never donned the Rave Green, so this isn't a certainty.
Mora is a player who is not a pure right back. He has plenty of time as a right midfielder, center mid and even a bit as a left mid with the Ticos. Recent play with the national team is as a supersub. It should also be pointed out that Saprissa recently acquired the player and he is part of their future plans according to the al Dia story.
A player with so much non-right back experience may seem like an odd get for a team that had some defensive issues in 2011, but Seattle is clearly going to an even greater possession based attack. With more passing out of the back the Sounders offense could be very fluid, exciting and yet risky. When it goes wrong, it will be ugly. When it goes right it is the beautiful game, tika-taka, 14-passes-to-a-goal type of stuff. In ways, Seattle may be playing a 2-3-1-4 next year. Sometimes the best defense is keeping the ball off their feet.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2-3-1-4?
I think my mind just exploded. I can’t even picture what that would look like, but it sounds like lots of goals and making Gspurning earn his paycheck.
Just so I have this straight:
You’re implying that the field would be something like this?
Hurtado-Parke
Mora-Alonso-Mystery Fullback
Fernandez
Zakuani-Montero-White-Rosales?
So given that we know Montero tends to play behind the other forward
Wouldn’t that be more like a 2-3-1-3-1?
The over/under for Gspurning goals this year is .5
I’m taking the over.
by lemonverbena on Dec 8, 2011 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
Im thinking it will be the arrow with wingbacks
So more of a 2-3-1-3-1. I could see Tetteh fitting in as a wingback. I haven’t seen too much of Mora so this is mostly conjecture.
-————GK
-——-CB CB
RWB—-CDM—- LWB
-————CM
RW—— WFD——LW
-————ST
I have a feeling that if we buy a very-attack minded right back
we’ll have a more or less three CB set up across the back. with zak coming back (fingers crossed) and slotting in on the left, I doubt we’ll have an attack-minded left back also. I could even see us dropping leo altogether and bringing scott or ianni back into the fold. that would make it like the barca-mold of having a marauding RB (dani alves role) and a stationary left back that is basically a left-sided CB.
FRIMPONG ought always be written in full caps #DEEEEEEENCH
There was an attack minded RB
that played on the same side as attack minded Mauro Rosales
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Dec 7, 2011 10:22 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
There will be too much space
In between the LM and LB/CB if thats what we decide to do. I think with advanced FB’s will mean that Ozzie will sit farther back and get into the attack less, think of him as an advanced CB. I think an asymmetrical formation can work but it will have to be slanted to the left because of where Zak tends to play farther up the field.
by Colin Johnson on Dec 7, 2011 10:48 PM PST up reply actions
The Dharma Initiative just called...
next year we will see a 4-8-15-16-23-42.
(The Seattle Sounders FC are my constant.)
Well, if you want to push a high backline, the center line would be the place to do it.
by DaveValleDrinkNight on Dec 8, 2011 3:08 AM PST reply actions
Our current CBs are not fast enough to play a high line.
Any speedy striker would tear us apart if we played a high backline. We would be even worse defending the counter.
First minute of FCB-RM shows the danger...
when it goes wrong, it’s spectacularly wrong… Even for the best possession team on the planet.

by 















