Seattle Sounders Depth Chart - 3 XIs From Chaos to an Evolver
The saying that you go to war with the equipment you have, not the equipment you want. So while some Sounders fans are wondering why a certain older forward is still on the team, or how weak the depth at right back is, this is pretty dang close to the roster that will be playing until the secondary transfer window in the summer. It should be noted that the primary window doesn't close until April 15th, and that the salary guarantee date is likely some time in late spring/early summer.
Sigi is looking at the Cascadia Summit as a way to finalize his units saying;
Obviously we have to make a decision a little bit in terms of the units we are going to play, when we are going to play one unit, when we are going to play the other. That’s something we are still kicking around a little bit but it’s important for us to continue to play well, continue to work well as a team.
But to this point we do have some guidance as to who will be used where, and how often. There are some slight changes to the depth chart formatting from the past. First, any injured player will just be dropped to lowest in their primary role. Second, there is a role added for Roger Levesque called the ForMidFender. He's going to be used as a utility guy so the depth chart should reflect that.
These, as always, are my best guesses based on what we know about the players. The only one on the list that I have not seen personally is Mauro Rosales. For #TheTrialist I have had to guess where he would be based on his very limited playing time.
Bold = MLS League play starting quality player in that role.
Regular = Non-League starting quality player (US Open Cup, CONCACAF Champions League)
Italics = Depth and Reserve League players
After the break lets see the depth chart as best we can tell
|
Nkufo |
||||||
|
White |
||||||
|
Noonan |
||||||
|
Zakuani |
Jaqua |
Fernandez |
||||
|
Montano |
Montero |
Rosales |
||||
|
Fucito |
Neagle |
|||||
|
Estrada |
||||||
|
Evans |
ForMidFender |
|||||
|
Friberg |
Levesque |
|||||
|
Gonzalez |
Seamon |
Riley |
||||
|
Tetteh |
Alonso |
Scott |
||||
|
Carrasco |
||||||
|
Parke |
Hurtado |
|||||
|
Wahl |
Ianni |
|||||
|
Graham |
||||||
|
Keller |
||||||
|
Boss |
||||||
|
Meredith |
Players in Camp | |||||
| Injured List: | None |
Ford |
31 | |||
| Injured | ||||||
| Seamon | Depth by Role | |||||
| Jaqua | Forwards | Wide Mids | Center Mids | Full Backs | Center Backs | |
| Montero | Zakuani | Alonso | Gonzalez | Parke | ||
| Nkufo | Fernandez | Evans | Riley | Hurtado | ||
| Jaqua | Rosales | Friberg | Tetteh | Ianni | ||
| White | Tetteh | Rosales | Wahl | Wahl | ||
| Fucito | Neagle | Seamon | Scott | Graham | ||
| Rosales | Montano | Carrasco | Ianni | Scott | ||
| Estrada | Estrada | Ianni | Levesque | |||
| Neagle | Levesque | Levesque | Neagle | |||
| Levesque | Evans | |||||
| Noonan | Fucito |
Yes, when Lamar Neagle was announced as a signee he was mentioned as a forward. Let's remember that the team still lists Mike Fucito as a midfielder. Neagle is likely to get most of his playing time on the right wing, and so that's how he's listed. He also seems to be the ForMidFender of the future as he has time as a WF, RW, RM and RWB, he could probably play LW and CM as well.
Rosales is nearly impossible to slot, but the team has used him as a CM and RW so far, and he has time as a forward though to little effect. Of course, he still has to make the team, hopefully with 00 on his shirt and #TheTrialist on his back.
Nate Jaqua isn't listed as a wide midfielder anymore, because the chances he gets time there outside of an interchange is going to be so minimal. Also, Bryan Meredith being above Josh Ford is only a reflection of their draft status. I don't think any two players are closer to each other in overall rating by the team than these two.
As stated earlier today, this is a roster without a lot of churn.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Love the title of the article
Also, which players do you see being on the proverbial ‘hot seat’?
by wyte_lightning on Mar 2, 2011 4:33 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Gaschk first put the word to paper so its spelled the way he does
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Just guessing, but...
… I’d think that his defensive skills aren’t quite far enough along yet to rely on at LB just yet, but his overall talents indicate that he could be a good starter at the wing if needed.
Writer: ProBallNW.com
Fan: Seattle Mariners, Seattle Sounders FC, Liverpool
Twitter
I hope that the plan is still to have him play left back for the future.
Gonzalez is getting old and I love the idea of two attacking full backs with Riley and Tetteh with our already dangerous wingers.
Well, there's a difference between Primary Role and Depth by Role
Primary role is where they will see the most time. Depth by Role is where they could be used.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
They said it
Its just easier to be a left wing than a left back
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Tougher to learn
Outside back is a tougher position to learn for a young player because they need to get into the attack but have the discipline and awareness to get back quickly.
on the fullbacks
as per the thread above about Tetteh, I would say that Tetteh would play as an attacking fullback, a role that is certainly familiar to those who watch the exploits of the Dani Ahlves’s of the world. It is a useful club to have in the bag, so to speak.
I am also alarmed at the overall situation at Right back, and the defense in general. An injury to Riley would constitute a crisis, and I just don’t like we are as deep at CB as it seemed like we would be at one point; even more so considering how many forwards we’re carrying.
Oh well, I hope/assume there is a plan…
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
Wingback v Fullback
I’d say that Tetteh, Leo and Riley are all attacking backs. Neagle if he gets time there. Now a day with Tetteh and Neagle at back? I would love that
Scott, Wahl are more flat back types. Levesque probably. Ianni and Parke if they slide over would be.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Could still use Evans in back
Not that it is particularly desirable.
by Little old me on Mar 2, 2011 5:12 PM PST up reply actions
I would think you'd shift Evans/Alonso back a spot on the spine and play Friberg at CM
Rather than play Evans in the back.
fullbacks attack
so I would say that Leo and Riley are just fullbacks, and I only like to use the term “wingback” in 3-defender systems to define that role of wide midfielder with defensive responsibility on the wings.
yes, I’m arguing semantics, but I also want to be sure we’re all talking about the same things. Tetteh, or even Neagle, would be particularly attacking for fullbacks, at least as I see it. They would be the more marauding type, playing more like a wingback in style, if not name.
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
by malcontentjake on Mar 2, 2011 5:24 PM PST up reply actions
Not just a
3 defender formation. Wing backs are a cross between a winger and a full back. They’re in the FB position but have the skill set and mentality of a winger. Most effective in a 4-3-3 as they can get up the lines and send in crosses, allowing the wingers to come inside and thus, 5 attackers in/around the box.
I hate to get too anal about this
But all these things are in the job description of a fullback, depending on the shape of the midfield. In a diamond, fullbacks push higher than the CDM (like Ashley Cole at Chelsea) “Wingback” is the postion in 3-defender systems that describes the full-back winger hydrid you’re talking about.
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
by malcontentjake on Mar 2, 2011 7:15 PM PST up reply actions
That final sentence is more how I apply wingback
because I don’t like calling a midfielder a “back”
If a player has someone besides the keeper behind them, they aren’t a back.
There are flat fullbacks and wide backs that slip into an attack on occaission. I call these wingbacks, generally on the same plane as a CDM.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I'm glad you brought this up
as I was gonna ask you to create a WB spot on the depth chart (or at least put notations for it). I’d also include Levesque as a straight WB as he’s the exact type of player that the position was created for. And I agree with you, I would LOVE to see Tetteh and Neagle on together at WB. Then maybe Sigi would give the 4-3-3 another go. We have the pieces for it now.
neagle at FB/WB
I think we can probably put that to rest for now. In listening to him tell it, he clearly sees himself as an offensive player at this point and talked about how last time he was here, he was playing all over the place whereas now he has a much more defined role.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, North American soccer editor SB Nation and of course follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on Mar 2, 2011 5:28 PM PST up reply actions
4-3-3?
the main issue with 4-3-3 is what to do with Montero. He was deemed “lazy” as a result of his exploits as a lone or top forward, which means he is either the CAM or a winger in a 4-3-3.
And its very likely 4-3-3 ends up being a more defensive set than we have now, particularly if none of the three central midfielders is a CAM.
With two marauding fullbacks, Alonso drops deep, like Busquets at Barca, and the back becomes the “W”, although I see this happening to begin with, regardless of who the fullbacks are.
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
by malcontentjake on Mar 2, 2011 7:20 PM PST up reply actions
I thought formations were/are neutral?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
exactly
which is how 4-3-3 can be more defensive than a 4-4-2/4-1-3-1-1/W-+ or whatever we want to call it around here…
...that's MISTER Keller to you!!!
by malcontentjake on Mar 2, 2011 8:13 PM PST up reply actions
Martinez and Cruz
Did anyone get a chance to see Martinez or Cruz? If so, what was your opinion? I was hoping we’d start the season with a stronger backup at RB in case Riley is injured or gets a red card…or for USOC and CCL.
by James Amspacher on Mar 2, 2011 5:23 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I liked Cruz what I saw of him
But he was really looked at as an Ianni type CB – one who could play RB, maybe CDM, and even enter the attack rarely, but primarily a CB
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Oh
…I thought they were both right backs. Thanks!
by James Amspacher on Mar 2, 2011 7:03 PM PST via mobile up reply actions

by 



















