Sounders Depth Chart - 3XIs Feels So Good Edition
Winning is fun isn't it? But with healthy being less of a concern, a few reserve games and scrimmages under the belt and five games into the season we have some insight into usage patterns by Sigi Schmid. Now with several Sounders returning to health, others in a solid form, and one plummeting down the depth chart things are different than they were during the last depth chart.
Returning to starting availability soon will be Nate Jaqua, Fredy Montero and Mike Fucito. They probably return in that order, though the difference between starts for Jaqua and Montero likely is not health. Fucito could be in the 18 as recently as this weekend.
Erik Friberg and Mauro Rosales both have been stellar. O'Brian White certainly has the hot "head" right now, and is playing Sigi's target role as well as any over a two game stretch. The curious case of Alvaro Fernandez also is reflected in the chart.
With the maturation of the Academy players there may be a time soon when youth players like Deandre Yedlin start showing up on the chart prior to their beings signed by the team. Call-ups to national teams like his recently as well as Aaron Kovar and Sean Okoli make this act tempting. But as of now, let's just deal with the guys under contract.
Format Explanation
Primary Role is the role I anticipate that we will see a player most over the next several League games.
Depth by Role is a listing of any role a player may make a contribution in League play by intent of the coach.
Injuries are now only listed on the secondary role and in orange for non-Injured Reserve moves. Red would be when a player is on the IR.
Within Depth by Role a player in bold is starting quality, in regular font is a rotational player and in italics is someone that would only fill in as a sub.
As always this is our attempt to read the tea-leaves of substitution patterns, starts and statements by the coaching staff. It is not their official chart, and they won't be releasing one. Click on and see
|
White |
||||||
|
Jaqua |
||||||
|
Noonan |
||||||
|
Zakuani |
Montero |
Rosales |
||||
|
Montano |
Fucito |
Fernandez |
||||
|
Tetteh |
Estrada |
Neagle |
||||
|
Evans |
||||||
|
Friberg |
ForMidFender | |||||
|
Seamon |
Levesque | |||||
|
Gonzalez |
Alonso |
Riley |
||||
|
Wahl |
Carrasco |
Scott |
||||
|
Parke |
Hurtado |
|||||
|
Graham |
Ianni |
|||||
|
Keller |
||||||
|
Boss |
||||||
|
Ford |
||||||
| Contract Players | ||||||
| Injured List: | None | 29 | ||||
| Injured | ||||||
| Fucito | Depth by Role | |||||
| Montero | Forwards | Wide Mids | Center Mids | Full Backs | Center Backs | |
| Montero | Zakuani | Alonso | Gonzalez | Parke | ||
| White | Rosales | Evans | Riley | Hurtado | ||
| Jaqua | Friberg | Friberg | Wahl | Ianni | ||
| Rosales | Fernandez | Rosales | Scott | Wahl | ||
| Fucito | Tetteh | Carrasco | Tetteh | Graham | ||
| Neagle | Neagle | Seamon | Levesque | Scott | ||
| Estrada | Montano | Fernandez | Ianni | |||
| Levesque | Levesque | Ianni | Neagle | |||
| Noonan | Estrada | Evans | ||||
The biggest questions people will have will be in regards to Brad Evans v Erik Friberg, and as Friberg as a CM. This issue is two fold. First, Rosales is more likely to retain time with Montero coming back. Mauro forces the left side defense to react in ways similar to Steve Zakuani. He is also more a right mid by history than a forward, and he can work with Fernadez learning Sigis system. Another issue with Evans v Friberg comes down to what Sigi expects from his more advanced CM, and Evans has more defensive balance than Friberg. Friberg would be more CAM than CM, and we know how the CAM/Montero thing works.
You will also notice movement in the forwards. All of these have to do with recent form by those moving up, and a lack of play for those moving down. The down movers aren't less than we thought they were, but OBW and Rosales are just better than they had been expected to perform.
The other moves are all related to the Reserve games.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting pick with Montano over Tetteh at LM
and Fernandez over Friberg on RM, at the second depth slot.
I’m sad to presumably be losing Friberg to the second choice in midfield, but I have a feeling we will be seeing him regularly, especially with Evans/Rosales’ limited fitness.
One thing that surprised me is the lack of depth at CB. After Ianni, Graham is all we have? Not that I think he’s a bad player, he looked solid in every game I watched him in over the past couple seasons. I just (for whatever reason) thought there were more than just him.
by chrisperry1983 on Apr 12, 2011 10:28 AM PDT reply actions
Montano is getting more playing time at LM
The question with Tetteh is LB or LM
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
you put montano over tetteh in the 3XIs
But you put tetteh over montano on the list for each position. Why is this??
by Sandra_R on Apr 12, 2011 11:11 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Because I think they like Tetteh at wide mid more
but I expect Sigi to play Montano at wide mid more
This is also a bit of a case where Tetteh’s lack of defined role would hurt him in this. Whereas Montano is clearly Left Wing right now
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Graham
Graham looked pretty bad in the Cascadia cup.
That was the Cascadia Summit
a preseason event.
I say this because the Cascadia Cup is a trophy that will be contested, with the first game in which Seattle competes being on May 14th against the Timbers. The winner of the Cup will be the best record amongst the 3 competing teams in only those competitions.
And Sure, Graham looked bad that game, but I don’t think Scott is ahead of him.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Yes, it's Levesque
Levesque is the Jack of all Trades player; Sigi has used him everywhere as a last-minute sub/workhorse.
Given that I can see why Dave is classifying him differently.
by ABTsportsline on Apr 12, 2011 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
CBs
Why do we have them listed as LCB and RCB? Isn’t it essentially the same position, or at least share the same depth list? If either Hurtado or Parke is out we are going with Ianni.
-Ben R.
They do share the same depth list
I thought it looked rather ugly to have another long single line. This was just a case of aesthetic trumping reality.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Friberg
My only comment is that based on the run of play and substitution patterns so far, I would expect Friberg to be second on the depth chart for both the CM and RF positions. If Sigi is going to only replace either Rosales or Evans in a game, I would expect him to replace whoever comes off with Friberg. I wouldn’t expect to see Fernandez until both have come off the field.
I wonder if a healthy Fucito is lower on the depth at WF than Rosales
It’s probably something of a moot point since Rosales, if he’s in the game, will be playing at RM IMO, but that’s been where 90% of his dangerous play has come from anyway. Given a need at WF, I think we see Fucito start vs having Rosales moved from RM.
Noonan - Will he see the filed this year?
He must have a lot of intangible/locker room/practice qualities, because I don’t see him seeing the field this year.
Noonan wasn’t even in the 18 in San Jose – and there won’t likely be any other game where the forward position was so depleted – Fucito out, Montero out, Jaqua recovering (but did play). Rather than go with Noonan, Sigi moved over Rosales – and Noonan didn’t even make the gameday 18- so that makes him like what, 5th string? I’m not even seeing him getting Open Cup / CCL time. If the games important, we have solid 2nd and 3rd stringers that will need to find playing time (Fucito, Jaqua/OBW). If it’s not important, then a younger player should get the experience.
In the past, the knock of Noonan was his salary cap hit. Nkufo departure opened up salary cap space and Noonan probably took a hit when they modified his contract to 3 months, so that’s not much of an issue anymore…and he’s probably a good guy and needs a job, so it’s really no skin off my back….but at some point you want to open up the roster to take a roll of the dice with younger talent.
by InternetCharlie on Apr 12, 2011 2:14 PM PDT reply actions
Noonan wasn't healthy for San Jose
Fact checking shows that Noonan was ‘still recovering’ for the San Jose game. But he still looks to be 5th string.
by InternetCharlie on Apr 12, 2011 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Probably not for us
I get the feeling he is being kept until the summer transfer window. I suspect part of the reason for the 3-month extension was because we were so depleted up front. But then again, I’m no expert in these matters…
by Christopher David Maddux on Apr 12, 2011 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Based on this
Should we be targeting a fullback for our DP slot instead of a target forward? It seems like our greatest needs are…
1) To let Parke and Hurtado gel by playing together a lot
2) To get a hair more depth at CB
AND (most importantly)
3) To get deeper / better at fullback
With Fucito and Montero and Jaqua getting healthy, and OBW showing that he can cut it as a genuinely good target forward, do we really need another forward?
I should clarify
I don’t mean that we need to spend DP money on a fullback – I should have said “international” or “summer transfer target,” whether they are a DP or not.
You can't count on them being healthy, though...
Jaqua and Fucito have been battling injuries the last two years; I wouldn’t trust that their “getting healthy” now as meaning our Forward problems are solved.
I think our two biggest needs right now are still F and LB, with CB, RB, and a true box-to-box CM as probably being the secondaries (for depth purposes).
by ABTsportsline on Apr 13, 2011 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I've downgraded our LB need over the last few games
I was as critical of Leo as anyone in the second half of last season, but I think he’s back to being a serviceable starting MLS LB (not taking into account the cards situation). He may have just made the adjustment to his aging legs. I don’t think he pushes forward as often as he used to, and that’s when he generally used to get burned. Could also be fitness, and he might wear down later in the season. Regardless, I think our major issue there is depth if he gets injured or is out with card accumulation, which isn’t the same as saying we don’t have a worthy starter there, which was arguably the case at times last season.
Then again, we’re not really desperate at F either.
Nos Audietis
Yes, i think they ride OBW's hot head
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Seconded
No reason not to go with who is in form; plus having Jaqua as an off-the-bench option in the 60th minute is a nice late-match boost as well.
by ABTsportsline on Apr 13, 2011 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions

by 

















