Relying on Controversy is a Foolish Way to Grow the Sport
Sometimes there are good messages that have to be delivered by the wrong people. In this case I feel the need to counter some of the ridiculous jubilation about the teapot tempest triggered by the comments John Spencer made yesterday regarding Sigi Schmid. Unfortunately, since I'm a Seattle fan it will be too easy to dismiss any opinion I have as hopelessly biased. But I'm not writing about Spencer's comments. I'm writing about the reaction to them. And you'll have to trust that I'd feel the same way if Schmid incited the same controversy in the same way.
Everyone around the game in the United States knows that the league is and should be desperate to grow the visibility of the sport. The mission of the league from day one has been to so enmesh soccer into the consciousness of the American sports fan that it would be inconceivable for it disappear, just as it would be inconceivable to imagine a sporting landscape in America that didn't include football, basketball, or baseball.
But like in all walks of life there's the quick, foolish, dangerous way to get something done and the long, hard, responsible slog to get it done. The long but ultimately sustainable way to grow the game in this country is to continue to make the game beautiful; to respect the fans — both the diehards and the new fans — as we've taken to new heights in Seattle (and in Portland and Vancouver as well); to increase the quality of the product on the field with increased talent and better officiating; to increase the visibility of the game by marketing the product well and holding broadcast partners to the highest standards; and so on. But that's work. And it's work a lot of MLS fans don't want to wait for.
Attention Seeking Behavior
Judging from the odd exultation arising from MLS observers across the Internet, for many people the lure of the quick attention hit is too much to resist. Attention from the prancing jackals on Sportscenter is like a drug. A fan or an executive gets one hit and starts to believe that their team, sport, league, or whatever is just one more Top 10 Play from hitting the big time. But people who watch top ten plays to see hockey fights and NASCAR crashes don't turn into long term hockey and NASCAR fans, no matter what commissioners pray for in their secret moments. And people who think that America will become a nation of soccer fans because of titillating chest-thumping among coaches and press conference tirades are deluding themselves. Those create more Sportscenter fans, not more soccer fans. Wayne Rooney didn't create any Premier League fans when he cussed out a camera lens, but he sure as hell sold a lot of newsprint.
It's not a phenomenon limited to sports, of course. The term 'media whore' is well-worn for a reason. And any parent will be familiar with the cycle of a child learning that they can get attention with negative behavior. Spencer was acting like a child yesterday, and he should be embarrassed. And the league would be acting like a child if it invested in the fool's gold promised by those shouting for more like a pack of school kids chanting 'FIGHT! FIGHT!' around a couple of shoving classmates.
MLS will succeed or fail on the backs of its fans, not on the number of times it can show up on a national media freakshow. Fandom is built on love for one's own team. When the Cascadia rivalry gets attention for the incredible amount of love the fans have for their team — evidenced by the enormous crowds, the chanting, the tifo displays — that grows the game more than 10,000 controversies and spats of the kind so many are foolishly jonesing for. And we've seen so many times how that love for one's own team can easily drift into hatred for another. Less than a week after speaking to MLS's Extra Time Radio and expressing his frustration and dismay over the shocking threats and attacks on Celtic manager Neil Lennon by Rangers fans, maybe Spencer should more carefully think about his own responsibility in fomenting those kinds of hatreds. And observers calling for more of the same should think more carefully about whether press conference slapfights will actually put a butt in a seat or turn a TV dial to a game.
33 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Couldn't Disagree More
When I read Spencer’s comments it made my blood boil a little. When those comments c popped up another 20 times in my Twitter feed, it got me so fired up for the trip to Portland, I almost left for the train station right then. Rivalries aren’t just about the game. They’re about having a true and utter distaste for your opponent and the media coverage only helps further foment that feeling.
But here's the question...
Would you be watching anyway?
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course
But is attendance/eyeballs the goal?
This next statement is definitely subjective, and maybe I’m the only person that feels this way, but my section (110) has gotten noticeably quieter over the course of the last three years. There used to be lots of people singing and clapping. Now there’s only a handful of us.
My point being that we’re at the beginning of building a fan base. Whatever connects people to the team, and drives passion, is a good thing. While you might not agree with the approach, the latest dust up has clearly raised the ire for some people, myself included.
It's raised the ire, no question
I’m just wondering if it’s really gotten the attention of new people who plan to make new decisions about the game. My gut says no.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
I'll put it another way...
If other Sounders sites say it’s good, I’m inclined to think it’s bad :)
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Two Words
Brian Mullan.
Anyone Sounders fans want to hold hands with me and take a stand against using controversy to grow buzz about the league now?
what?
No one in the Sounders organization went after Mullan in any way… Just some angry fans upset that he ended a players season.
by Shane Waletzko on May 18, 2011 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Judging by the rest of the comments so far
yes. I can’t even believe what I’m reading. Yes, let’s make it nasty. Yes, let’s make it hateful. Yes, let’s make it personal. Let’s all be prepubescent about it. Let’s boil it all down to its lowest possible denominator.
How about let’s make it classy? Let’s make it passionate? Let’s do it respectfully. Let’s do it better than them. We have a chance to show the rest of the world something here. I’ve been a Sounder fan pretty much longer than anyone here. I’ve never hated Portland and never will. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want to rip ’em a new one every time we play them. Some folks here need to do a great deal of growing up.
There were plenty of people
Asking for the rhetoric against Brian Mullan to be tuned down, many of them, including myself, write on this site. Not sure what you’re getting at.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions
rivarly is good for the growth of the sport here
it smacks of elitism and wussy fence-sitting to pretend to be above the fray
Win or lose, we'll always be there for you.
by johnjahafanclub on May 18, 2011 1:39 PM PDT reply actions
do you know what elitism means?
Nos Audietis
by sidereal on May 18, 2011 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The way I interpret that is
you have some people who are “above the rivalry” and look down on those who get hyped up about it. At least that’s how I understood what he said.
by chrisperry1983 on May 18, 2011 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions
The rivalry seems to be doing just fine
Before Spencer was talking…
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions
As Big Tom of Tommy Boy fame said...
You’re either growing or dying, there ain’t no in between.
He also said, “I can get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull’s ass, but I’d rather take the butcher’s word for it.” So you know he speaks the truth.
So we were growing before...
Not sure i’m following
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions
You’re either growing the rivalry or the rivalry lessens. it doesn’t stay stagnant. What actions lead to growth? To me, and it seems like at least a few others, Spencer’s comments, Sigi’s response and the ensuing media coverage increased the intensity of the rivalry.
And what our point is
Is that for every person that sees it as more intense, there are others who see it as a ridiculous sideshow. It’s a fair point on which to disagree and it’s one where we obviously do.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 18, 2011 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Balance
I certainly don’t want to build the MLS into the WWE but I don’t think it has to be either or. I want the MLS to be big because we have the best product on the field and incredible passion for the team. I don’t see why it’s mutually exclusive. I don’t think we need to encourage coaches to talk like they’re in middle school again but I don’t see any reason to discourage it either.
But should that passion be shown
as coaches trash talking each other? I’d rather have a coach that let his teams play show the passion. It really does make them look childish. Even the support groups seem to speak well of each other and fight their battles by out doing one another. That I believe is a great way to show passion and is very beneficial to the team and the league.
Controversy is a bad growth strategy
It’s a good observation that controversy isn’t likely to grow new fans. That rings true.
For current fans, though, spats like this help. Now, and improbably, I’m even more excited for our next Portland game than I would have been without Spencer’s zaniness. My excitement can’t be bad for the league.
Building the MLS is about checking every box possible, and controversy and rivalry is certainly an important one. Keep talking crazy, coach.
I'm thrilled about it...
This back and forth in the press is an indication that the league is relevant enough to be cared about on some level. Even this league’s founding fathers—the DC Uniteds, the LA Galaxies—they still don’t draw a lot of intrigue or controversy in their matchups with one another. I can’t tell you how many times I sit down to watch Direct Kick and it’s ‘Chivas vs. Columbus’ or ‘Colorado’ vs. ‘New York’. As much as the league office would like people to care about these matchups, most of the time to the casual viewer the teams don’t have personality and they don’t feel that the players on the field have animosity towards each other.
The league is now bubbling past that water mark with a rivalry like Cascadia, and I think it’s great that the coaches are willing to be a bit cheeky, have some fun in the press, and give their players a bit more to play for. The top coaches in other sports do it all the time (Phil Jackson… Jose Mourinho) and it’s one of the colorful parts about sports instead of, say, an office setting.
My hat goes off to Spencer and Sigi for engaging each other like this. Let’s hope it continues.
You mentioned four total coaches
two of them are the best in the world at their sport
one is top two in American soccer
One is John Spencer
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on May 18, 2011 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I could go on mentioning that coaches do this...
…but I think you take my point. Having a bit of fun in the press about a rivalry isn’t a bad thing—good coaches do it. I
How about guys like Ian Holloway
http://redflagflyinghigh.com/2011/05/football-bloody-hell/ian-holloways-top-ten-quotes
Win or lose, we'll always be there for you.
by johnjahafanclub on May 20, 2011 4:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Ian Holloway is a loudmouthed twat and I cannot wait until he and his creamsicle brigade are sent back down to the Championship where they belong.
I am so tired of the culture of celebration that exalts people for being idiots merely because their idiocy is deemed to be entertaining.
by Aaron Campeau on May 20, 2011 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions
agree to disagree
I love Holloway
Win or lose, we'll always be there for you.
by johnjahafanclub on May 20, 2011 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
the players on the field having animosity towards each other
they don’t, for the most part. They all get along and they’ve all moved around teams enough that half have played with the other half. The whole ‘these players really don’t like each other’ angle in a broadcast is a tired lie and I think it’s sad that some people need animosity to exist to get up for a game.
Nos Audietis
Some of my favorite sports memories
are associated with teams caring. A lot. They want to win and it shows: on and off the field. Two coaches being cheeky in the press is not evidence of ‘controversy for the sake of controversy’. If this were a story that had blown up and was one of the rare times MLS news had reached ESPN Sportscenter, and they were actually saying something, you might have a case.
Formenting hatred? I’m not sure where you’re getting that. His invective was playful, and if you read Sigi’s response he even goes so far as to drop a reference about delivering roses without petals on them—a jab about Portland’s ‘Rose City’ name.
When Spencer comes out in the press and says he wants his players to ‘really kill’m out there!’ or ‘fight them like it’s a battle in the street’, you might have a case about MLS coaches needing to tone down their invective. But as it stands, it’s oversensitivity.
As I said before, coaches in all sports do this—a playful jab in the press at the other team. That’s all.

by 
















