Seattle Sounders Vs. Sporting Kansas City: Jeff Parke Wins It With Stoppage Time Header
The promised rapture came and went on Saturday with no appreciable signs of impending doom. Of course, there are probably some Sporting Kansas City fans who see it a little differently after Jeff Parke scored a stoppage-time goal to give the Seattle Sounders a 1-0 win. It was the second straight time that SKC had lost at Qwest on a late score.
That it was Parke, who last scored a MLS goal on June 12, 2004, may just be a sign that the apocalypse is nigh, after all. When asked if Parke was the least likely player on the Sounders to score a game-winning goal, Tyson Wahl could only offer two other contenders.
"Maybe myself ... or Kasey," said Wahl, who acknowledged that Sounders coach Sigi Schmid had actually called out Parke recently, asking him when was the last time he scored on a corner. "So, it's pretty ironic that he scored, pretty funny."
The decisive play took a little longer to develop than normal. It started when a ball went out of bounds on the endline and there was some confusion about it being a corner kick or a throw in. Roger Levesque, in fact, first threw in the ball, which referee Geoff Gamble immediately whistled dead and called for the corner. The play was further delayed when Gamble got between Parke and Roger Espinoza, who had been exchanging words. Finally, Wahl took the kick and Parke floated his shot to the far post, completely turning around what was promising to be another frustrating night at Qwest.
"I told him, 'You've been holding onto me all night,' and he said 'No, I haven't, no I haven't,'" Parke said of his conversation with Espinoza. "See, this is what happens when you don't hold onto me. I can actually get up off the ground and do something."
While the win was certainly exciting, it would be a mistake to take too much away from it. Last year's similarly dramatic win over Kansas City was followed be a run of matches in which the Sounders won just 2 of 10. In this one, the Sounders put just two shots on goal, never really threatened SKC goalkeeper Jimmy Nielsen until the very end and struggled to turn their possession advantage into any kind of cohesive attack. Credit Peter Vermes with coming out with a defensive posture, but feel free to openly wonder whether or not this team has been stretched too thin from an offensive standpoint.
In the meantime, though, let's try to enjoy this one. At the very least, if you're reading this that means you weren't called away. For those of us at Qwest, those final few moments at least felt like heaven on earth.
"Can we play better? Yes," Schmid said. "Do we like the three points? Yes."
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We went from breaking records
of shots on goal to this. Our offense is non-existent these days, spin it how you like, we looked awful tonight.
spin it?
I think i said that almost exact thing
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2011 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
but of course that shot on goal record came in a loss. It was really disappointing for 92 minutes…
by Shane Waletzko on May 21, 2011 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Did it?
Unless I’m mistaken we tied Houston when that record was broken.
http://www.oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=4172078
Oops.
Haha, typical American approach to sports that I remembered a tie as a loss.
by Shane Waletzko on May 21, 2011 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
but of course that shot on goal record came in a loss. It was really disappointing for 92 minutes…
by Shane Waletzko on May 21, 2011 10:40 PM PDT reply actions
things I tried to post from Qwest but couldn't due to crappy coverage on my phone:
-The final corner we scored on REALLY looked like it should’ve been a throw in.
-A drop ball? Seriously?
-This ref was bullshit
by chrisperry1983 on May 21, 2011 10:43 PM PDT reply actions
Yeah
It wasn’t that he was biased one way or the other, he was just terrible. Really inconsistant with what was a foul. Kept missing calls… just a joke.
I really feel like it shouldve been a throw in
I presume Jeremiah or Dave will say something about it after a replay review…but as of now I’d be furious if I were KC staff or a KC fan
by chrisperry1983 on May 21, 2011 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I saw it as a corner live
Replay seemed to suggest it should have been a corner too. It was very close
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 21, 2011 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions
It looked like a corner live from GA
And watching the replay it looked like a corner. The linesman was very quick to point his flag down for the corner once he got out of the way of the players.
by MicahRowe18 on May 22, 2011 4:50 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
On TV, I thought it was clearly a corner
The ball was definitely already totally over the line when it was booted out by the KC player
Refs first game
This was the refs first match as the head official. I think he was timid with a lot of calls. I did like that he have Ryan Smith a card for the same thing Fernandez did though.
by Russell Dodds on May 22, 2011 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
sad thing is
this was a typical ref for the MLS. I could train a bunch of monkeys to be more consistent than the MLS ref pool
It was a corner
The replays on the broadcast clearly showed it was a corner, but that would have been hard to see real time for anyone other than the linesman who was the one who called the corner. The ball curled over the end line in the air before it arched back and went over the sideline.
karmic payback
Should have had 3 pts against the Dynamo and should have had 1 tonight. Will certainly take it. Was troubled by lack of turns upfield. Seemed like the default was to pivot and toss the ball back instead of turning and charging up the flank. Gave SKC way too much time to set the defense. Levesque was biggest offender here.
by jayw913 on May 21, 2011 11:43 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
That was my first game to attend!
Great experience, but wow, did they look bad throughout most of the game.
Carrasco was clearly out of his element
I really don’t understand the decision to put Carrasco at RM rather than say Neagle. Luckily it didn’t cost us points.
He's definitely not comfortable on the outside
We clearly could’ve used a 100% Friberg or Evans on the right tonight.
by MicahRowe18 on May 22, 2011 4:55 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
i agree
i was surprised to hear carrasco was on the right rather then neagle.
i dont understand sigi trying to play him out of position.
to me he seems like a replacement for alonso and sigi seems not to see that.
Could it have been to address the solid winger play of KC?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
That makes sense, but...
Kamara is the big threat on the wing, which was Flaco/Wahl’s job. Also, Neagle is a good defender on the wing.
by Dizzo on May 22, 2011 12:12 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes
"But who would listen to Little old me anyway?"
-by thehemogoblin
by Little old me on May 23, 2011 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions
great victory
Id like to pretend somehow our injury depleted squad should dominate games but that would make me stupid. Right noow we got to grind results until the summer transfer window as we get guys back.
Ill take 3 points, if we get 3 on wdnesday sigi will be well on track for coach of the year.
by python6114 on May 22, 2011 9:43 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Rosales
looked great at CM. Carasco at RM did not. I don’t understand that decision but due to the lack of available options I sort of get it. Although I would really like to see Montano again. That red card last year really put him on Sigis bad side… too bad. He has a great touch. Montero lacked energy once again but he pretty much doesn’t have a capable partner up top. I said it last week but I’m still frustrated with Wahl. Yes yes I know he is good on corners and has a decent long ball, but that’s whats frustrating to me is his first option is to look for the long ball. Part of this is due to the difference between the Leo/Steve passing game that I just dont see build very well between Wahl/Fernandez. With that said where is his connection with Alonso and Rosales? He doesn’t looks to link up with his CM’s much. I am really excited for CCL, maybe we’ll get to see Tetteh’s touch. I know we wouldn’t have gotten three points without Wahls corner so I don’t want to argue about that one. However, we should not have had to get to that point.
If you want to see Montano show up for the 2nd half of Reserve games
There’s a reason that’s the time he’s getting.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on May 22, 2011 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Leo vs. Wahl
If the plays come fast at Leo he gets really burned these days. He just seems a step slow sometimes.
I think with the new diamond formation Sigi thinks the fullback providing service is more important than the short passing game. His job is to get forward some and put in a cross, that is where the width should come from in the new formation. Wahl seems to be doing that fairly well while still getting back on defense effectively.
by Russell Dodds on May 22, 2011 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Montero lacking energy?
I saw him sprinting all over the field running down poor passes and trying to make himself available. Obviously towards the end of 90 mins he won’t be sprinting on every run, but Montero was not an issue tonight.
And Montero had a lot of work to do trying to win headers against KC's center backs
He was working hard, and won more headers than I feel a player of his stature had any business winning.
by ubelmann on May 22, 2011 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Totally agree.
As has been said a hundred times here before, the Lazy, Unmotivated Montero theme is tired.
You might even call the meme lazy...
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter
by Jeremiah Oshan on May 23, 2011 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
another question i have was why was scott in the 18 over gonzalez?
i was really confused by that
Scott used to be a LB
…if I remember correctly. Sigi might have wanted cover on both FB spots.
by Dizzo on May 22, 2011 12:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Right, Scott has been used as a LB, CB and RB
Leo is a LB and maybe LM
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I wonder if he's not 100% or something
Before the game, one might have thought the Sounders could get a big lead and maybe sub on Leo at the end to get closer to a forgiven yellow card.
On Leo...
I’ve been saying for awhile that I will be surprised if Gonzalez is a 2012 Sounder. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s gone by the closing of the summer transfer window.
Terrible's what it is.
-Big George
I would be.
He is still better than Zach Scott.
Lets not forget that Scott is the player who has inspired more drinking games than perhaps any other Sounder to date.

by 




















