In Retrospect, Pulling Starters En Masse Was A Regrettable Mistake
The day after matches, we usually reserve for rational discussion. But because of the somewhat crazy nature of Wednesday's 7-0 thrashing at the hands of Manchester United, I think I may have over-compensated the day of. With so many people absolutely freaking out -- or at least a few people doing so very loudly -- I didn't want to feed into that. My reaction was to give more of a shoulder shrug when people started throwing out words like "embarrassed" or "shamed" or whatever other adjectives they felt compelled to use to describe how they felt after the game.
With a night to think about it, and time to go over some of the post-game quotes, I think I can at least find some common ground with people upset about Wednesday's game.
Sigi's decision to sub en masse at the start of the second half was, in retrospect, a rather significant mistake. While this game was an exhibition, the reality is that there was no obvious downside to subbing out starters in a somewhat more measured way. The Sounders did not have a practice scheduled for Thursday and don't have another game until Wednesday.
The only starters to come out for the second half were a trio of defenders, but they were left woefully over-exposed by a midfield that just did not have the speed to compete with the likes of United. I'm not saying Sigi should have left all the starters out there for the second half, but a more measured substitution patter could have at least helped kept the second half from turning into the debacle that it did.
The substitution patter may have been consistent with past decisions in previous big-name friendlies (five halftime subs against Chelsea and 10 against Barcelona), but those were followed by league games three days later. Leaving in a few more starters to play another 10-15 minutes would have likely had limited downside, and with more than 67,000 people in attendance -- many of whom paid hundreds of dollars for tickets -- it shouldn't have been too much to ask to attempt to put on a little bit more of a show.
Reading the post-game quotes, I'm frankly a little shocked at Sigi's reaction. He obviously knows how good United are and must have had a suspicion that some of their top players were going to appear in the second half. That he was apparently caught off guard by the beating his team was given in the second half seems a bit strange.
There's a big but, coming after the jump
All of that said, I still think some of the bigger-picture reactions are a bit much. That the Sounders reserves are no match for United's is not a revelation. Almost anyone on the field for United in the second half would be a star in MLS. For the most part, the second-half Sounders are fighting for spots on the gameday 18 in MLS. Yeah, there's a big gap. No one should be surprised.
If people came away from that match taking it as proof that MLS is not worth their time, I really don't believe they were ever going to be convinced otherwise. Those people aren't looking for reasons to watch MLS, they are looking for excuses not to watch. Maybe Wednesday's match gave them more ammunition, but a 4-1 loss wasn't going to win them over anyway.
As to the possible long-term ramifications, I guess we'll see. Surely, the loss was a wake-up call for some of our backups. No one on the field in the second half is anywhere near earning a European contract. I don't see why it would have any deleterious effects on our starters, though. They weren't run off the field by United, after all. They stood toe-to-toe with one of the best teams in the world and held their own for a half. That should not be forgotten.
Maybe the oddest thing I saw in post-game reactions was the idea that this game is proof that playing big-name European teams is a bad idea, and that somehow playing the West Bromowich Albions or the Celtics of the world is preferable. Friendlies are not about measuring yourself, they are about putting on a show. This being an unscripted drama, sometimes the show doesn't go as planned. If we are going to keep playing friendlies -- and I don't see the practice ending anytime soon -- the most we can ask is that our starters are given more of a chance to perform.
Post-game quotes
Sigi Schmid - Sounders FC Head coach
(General Comments...) "It was 1-0 at halftime. Were they 6-0 better than us in the second half? Yeah, they were because they finished their chances and we didn't finish ours. I felt we had an equal amount of good chances but that's the difference in the quality in the level of play - the ability to finish. I need to apologize to our fans because I thought we embarrassed ourselves in the second half, not to take anything away from Man United because they're a great team. They scored some great goals and their movement was superb. We wanted to reward all the guys on the team, wanted to play everybody. I think in retrospect that was a mistake. I should have played guys and brought some guys off the bench and not tried to get everybody in the game. We've had a hard season. We've worked very hard and played very well and I wanted to reward all the guys with the opportunity to get on the field against Man United. Unfortunately they didn't reward themselves."
(On if missing starters hurting result...) "I don't know if you can tie the two together. Obviously it was going to be a difficult game from the beginning because they're a good team. If we play our starters for a longer period of time and with Tyson Wahl getting injured the day before that's one starter down and Brad Evans going down right away when he goes in doesn't help us. I think we would have kept the game in check. If we finish the chances we had in the first half we also get a little bit more of the game. For me, I know it's my most embarrassing loss, personally. It's not to take anything away because they're an unbelievably good team."
(On first half...) "In the first half we did well. We struggled defending against some of their corners. I thought they had some good opportunities off of their corners and we struggled a little bit on our left side defensively. I thought Nani in conjunction with Rafael got in behind and caused some problems. I also felt that we were able to hold the ball, we were able to get in on them. We had some chances. [Fredy] Montero had some good chances. The one he had, if he lifts his head and slips it to [Alvaro] Fernandez, Fernandez is naked. The other one that Ozzie [Osvaldo Alonso] hits and gets deflected, Roger [Levesque] was naked at the back post. A little more cleverness and a little more sharpness and we might have had a goal or two. Overall, I wasn't displeased with what we did in the first half. I thought the first half was good."
(On injured starters...) "Tyson [Wahl] should be alright. With Brad [Evans], we don't know yet."
(On Wayne Rooney's goal scoring ability...) "We'd like to have him. He'd be good for us. Obviously he's a good player. When you look at it they had very few wasted chances. [Kasey] Keller came up with a big save in the first half. I think they might have pulled one wide in the second half and [Terry] Boss came up with a save but outside of that every time they had a clean look on goal it was in the back of the net. That's the difference in quality between here and overseas."
(On what score would be acceptable...) "3-0 or 4-0. The early goal in the second half and the goal right after that. If I could turn the clock back 10 minutes I would have sent the same team out that finished the first half but it was too late."
(On second half...) "Obviously we saw their bench. When you come with [Michael] Carrick off the bench and you come with [Wayne] Rooney off the bench and come with [Ji-Sung] Park off the bench, you're going to create some problems. Our bench is not the same. I don't want to take this away from my team. That's not to say that in the second half we didn't create some chances. I think we created some chances. [Lamar] Neagle had a couple good looks. [Pat] Noonan had two good chances. We had chances to score but our defending was absolutely atrocious in the second. Our attacking play wasn't that bad but our defending was absolutely horrendous. They made good runs off the ball and we were slow on reacting."
(On playing all players...) "We had made a decision prior to the game that we were going to try to give everyone a game today. It was a reward for our team, plus we've logged a lot of minutes. In the last 21 days we've played five or six games. We wanted to get some guys off their feet."
Kasey Keller - Sounders FC Goalkeeper
(On the match...) "Have you ever heard the cliché, 'A game of two halves?' It was kind of that a little bit. Hopefully it's a learning experience. We put so many guys out on the field in the second half [...] because everybody thinks they can play in the Premier League in America. Everybody thinks, 'Oh, if I just got the break that I could be there.' And actually, no you can't and you need to learn to figure that out. I was talking to Sir Alex afterwards, walking off the field, and they're one of the best counter-attacking teams in the world and we gave them all the space in the world to do exactly what they're best at. You have to learn. You have to adapt. You have to figure out how things are going in the game and make it right. The second half was extremely disappointing. But he [Sir Alex] was very gracious, he said, 'The score line wasn't indicative of the result.' So that's a little comfort. We had great chances. We know their keepers made some good saves, but we needed to be that [...] I mean you saw how clinical Wayne Rooney is in the box. You give him that chance and he's going to bury it and they did exactly that."
(On if Michael Owen has scored on him before...) "I'm sure he's scored on me once or twice but I always had great results against Liverpool everywhere I was. He might have scored on me for Newcastle, funny enough. But Michael has been a great player. It was nice to be able to come up with that save against him and keep it tight there before the second half."
(On what he said to him after the save...) "I can't remember what he said to me. He said something to me, then I said something back to him when he cleared the ball off the line for us. So we had a good running commentary. Like I said, he's a good guy. He got his goal then it was nice to be able to make the save."
(On if he will be present at the MLS All-Star game...) "Yeah, I'll be there. I'll thank Mike Gastineau for getting me into the All-Star game. It was cool. It worked out in the end, let's put it that way."
(On what went wrong in the second half...) "Well, I think what was extremely disappointing was that as well as we played and the chances we created, we weren't able to give our fans that goal. We did the same thing against Chelsea. We had chances to get a goal against Chelsea to get the crowd up. We had chances against Barcelona to do the same thing and we just couldn't make it happen. It's frustrating. It's disappointing. And I know Sigi [Schmid] is embarrassed for everything that happened in the second half, but hey, I've been on a Premier League team and got beat 6-1 against their team. It's not something to be too disappointed against. We just know we could do better and we know that our players could have played better. I think that's the most frustrating thing."
Lamar Neagle - Sounders FC Midfielder
(On the match...) "We definitely wanted to play better and show a little bit more, but it is what it is. We're still in the middle of the season, so we just need to think about that and focus on our next game."
(On if there is anything in particular as to why the match got out of hand in the second half...) "It was a combination of things. It's tough coming on in the second half, they still have the same guys on, we have six of seven new guys coming on, we're trying to get our defense working together, and we've been kind of breaking on it. They're fast breaking a lot of the time and it's kind of hard to keep track. You can see their level. It was definitely unfortunate, it kind of got out of hand."
(On the feel of the match...) "It's still a great experience. It's still something to remember. I'm a young guy in the beginning of my career, so it's nice to get these games in and play against these guys. But definitely not the kind of experience...we don't want to remember the 7-0, but it's still nice to say we played against these guys."
Pat Noonan - Sounders FC Forward
(On the lopsided play tonight...) "It was just embarrassing. Unfortunately we embarrassed ourselves. We need to forget about it as soon as possible and understand that we need to get those opportunities. Against a team of that caliber you can't put together performances like that. We were meant to enjoy it and it just didn't turn out that way at all."
(On his missed opportunities...) "I've got to put those in. They're close range, keeper right in my face, but I've got to put them in the corner where he can't make those saves. Even though we're playing Manchester United, those are goals you should finish. I guess you could say it's 'One of those nights', but those were times where we could have maybe turned it around a little bit, and I wasn't able to do that. It was frustrating."
(On when the game became un-enjoyable...) "Very early in the second half, giving up an early goal - pretty much everything to do with the second half. Not tracking runners, not connecting passes, everything that you can do when you're playing any team, much less Manchester United. Unfortunately it wasn't a very enjoyable situation."
(On if Manchester United ran up the score more than they needed to...) "No, that's on us. Absolutely not. If I'm on that side of things I'm doing the same thing. You've still got to play. You're not going to stop playing in this game and just connect 10 or 15 passes, if you have a chance to go to goal you go to goal, and they did. They were clinical in front of the net and we weren't. But by no means were they running it up. We should be able to avoid a 7-0 defeat, we're a good enough team. It's disappointing."
Sir Alex Ferguson - Manchester United Manager
(On his overall impressions of the game...) "It was a strange game because I don't think that the score reflected the chances they had. In the first half, the Sounders have had two or three good chances and because their goalkeeper had two great saves. I know Kasey Keller's had a couple good saves himself. But it was nothing ruined in the match, the first half. I think that Rooney goal, the second one, on the counter-attack just opened the game for us. It was a strange score line. It really wasn't a seven-nil score line. The Sounders could have really scored a few goals. But I'm pleased at the counter-attack in the second half by us. I'm pleased that our fitness was good and the spread of goals was good. To get goals from different players, which is always encouraging, because last year we depended on three players for all our goals. So that was good, what we saw tonight."
(On Wayne Rooney and his three-goal performance tonight...) "It's nice he scored. I'm pleased with all the goal scorers. It's a nice start for the season for him, three goals. He's worked hard, he's done really well in training."
(On the likeliest replacement for retired goalkeeper Edwin Van der Sar...) "Obviously we're saying David De Gea as who I would imagine is the main choice. But I have to say that the other two goalkeepers, Anders Lindegarrd and Ben Amos, have probably said to themselves, 'There's an opportunity here with [Edwin] Van der Sar retiring, so it's an open door for me.' De Gea will play on Saturday against Chicago. They'll all get their share of games."
(On the Sounders' play...) "I think that even for them, the counter-attack was good in the first half. I think [Osvaldo] Alonso's a good player. I like him. I think he's a very clever player and knows how to play midfield. He's obviously experienced. [Mauro} Rosales we saw on Saturday also and we marked him down as probably the danger because he knows how to play his position. [Alvaro} Fernandez did some good things in the first half also. I think it was quite an open game. The Sounders, in the first half, would definitely be pleased with their performance."
(On the purpose of going on a U.S. tour...) "The purpose is two-fold. We think that the United States is an emerging country in terms of soccer. It's also potential for us to increase our support-base, which we're always conscious of. In the Far East, we have a huge, huge support there. We've seen tonight the impact we're making in the States. We had a good support ourselves tonight. The Sounders obviously had 40,000 supporters, but we probably, obviously, we probably got the rest. That was a pleasing aspect for us when we try to spread our gospel about the way we play, the romance of the club, the history of the club. And the United States is a growing market in terms of supporters."
(On whether Nani will compete for a starting role on the team...) "I think that there's competition there. Obviously the point you made about [Antonio] Valencia. Nani, the whole season, had done real well for us. But then when Valencia came back, his form was so good, it was difficult to put him out of the team. It was unfortunate not to get picked for the final. He's still young. He's maturing all the time. He's a really, really good player, Nani is. His personality is improving in terms of he's a quiet lad. I think that he will be challenging and he'll play a lot of games."
(On his defenders...) "Well they're experienced. Both sets of backs are very experienced, obviously...Patrice Evra did very well tonight, his first game back for a long time. I always feel that when the back four is all together, the experience we've got with Evra, [Nemanja] Vidic and [Rio] Ferdinand and sometimes it's Raf [Rafael Da Silva] and sometimes it's Fabio [Da Silva]. It's a strong, strong unit there."
(On the atmosphere of the game...) "It was brilliant. The pleasing thing for me was the number of fans all mixed together. That was like the old days of England and Scotland, when fans could mix together and no trouble. I don't know if we could ever get back to that, but it was a pleasure to watch that tonight. The atmosphere was always good. The Sounders' support is fantastic. It's a plus-point that, it's a big plus-point, to see fans mingling together and enjoying it."
Rio Ferdinand - Manchester United Defender
(General thoughts on the team's time in Seattle...) "Very good. Great support. Good people. They looked after us and we had a great time. And they're genuine football fans.
(On if he was surprised with the atmosphere in the stadium...) "I was, yeah. I came here in 2003, a long time ago, and the interest, the knowledge and passion wasn't as great it was today. It's a great surprise."
(On differences between this trip and the 2003 trip...) "It's just a different feel, a different vibe. They're just genuine football fans that come here to support football and their team. The Sounders have great support."
(On seeing so many Manchester United fans in Seattle...) "It's not a great surprise because we have fans everywhere, but the amount of people that we saw here in the stadium, outside the hotel and the amount of people who have been here in the city wishing us well has been phenomenal."
Ryan Giggs - Manchester United Midfielder
(On general impressions of his time in Seattle...) "I've enjoyed it. Their fanatical fans really. I think we witnessed that tonight and we've witnessed it all week. You got told that the Seattle fans are the best in the MLS and I think we witnessed that tonight."
(On the differences between previous visit to Seattle and tonight...) "It's a different atmosphere. You see with the home fans that it's their home pitch and they want to do well. Overall we're really pleased with the result. First half, it could have been a lot different. Seattle played really well and we were probably lucky to keep it at zero."
(On the Sounders' play in the first half...) "It could quite have easily been 2-1, 2-all. The second half, the lads played well and every chance they got, they scored. That's what sometimes separates good players from great players."
(On the expectations that follow the club...) "It's something that, whether you've grown up in the club like myself, or if you're a player who's just come in, you realize that it's a huge club. Expectations are high and you're expected to win things."
Anders Lindegarrd - Manchester United Goalkeeper
(General comments...) "I believe it was 7-nil, and I believe that was too much. I think compared to the team we played in Boston, New England, I believe that Sounders have more quality of a team from my point of view [...] They like to play football, not like kick and rush which I would have expected when I came to the States. It was alright that we won the game but seven-nil is too much."
(On his two back-to-back saves in the first half...) "It's going very quickly so you're just reacting. It's in your backbone what to do. It's not like a process that you go through, you just react."
(On the crowd at Century Link Field...) "It was very noisy. It was difficult to communicate. It seemed to be a great crowd. It must be fantastic for the team here to get that kind of support...that is very impressive."
(On dealing with the crowd...) "Playing for Manchester United. It's a normal part of your day to perform in front of so many people. If you can't perform in front of a big audience, you're not going to play for Manchester United."
154 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stick to your guns
It’s pretty common practice to sub a full team at the half in friendlies. We did it against City, City did it, Arsenal did it in SE Asia, etc.
I think the issue may be that getting beaten so badly doesn’t quite fit with the fans’ idea of the Sounders. So then the fans would rather see the starters continue or sub out gradually, rather than giving the reserve/fringe players a full half to play.
I might feel differently if City had scored more than 2 against our reserves in the second half, but they didn’t really try that hard, and a 2-1 loss looks fine, especially for a last-place team (Whitecaps).
Come over to the Whitecaps Offside page:
http://vancouver.theoffside.com/
by Brenton Offside on Jul 21, 2011 10:24 AM PDT reply actions
When you're charging hundreds of bucks and don't have other games scheduled
I do think you can afford to leave your starters in a little longer.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
your 2nd paragraph
Is dead on. Anybody complaining about mls quality was looking for an excuse to not care. Again people are assuming that our starters weren’t going to get smashed by Rooney and Ji-Sung Pak is just commenting out their ass. We might have lost just as bad while increasing the risk of a significant injury. Maybe one day we can play man u in a match that matters.
by python6114 on Jul 21, 2011 1:54 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't want to shrub it off completely.
It isucks to lose 7-0 regardless of the situation. That being said, the game itself was not important and life goes on. At least we didn’t lose to Colorado 4-1 and Nyassi didn’t score a hat trick on us! That would be embarassing if that ever happened to someone.
"The fans are excited. And the stadium, well, it ignites with explosion."
Big name friendlies
I think it’s absurd to think that we should bring in poorer teams to play friendlies so we’re more competitive. The whole point of these is to entertain, bring in people who might not normally come, and make an extra buck that can be spent on the team. You’re not going to get that with West Brom. They couldn’t even fill Jeld-Wen for that match in Portland. I enjoyed last night’s match despite the drubbing. I don’t want to see my team get embarrassed, but I do want to see Rooney bang out an impressive goal. I do want to see Ozzie take the ball off Giggs. I enjoyed the hell out of Keller stuffing Owens. I don’t care if we might do better against Blackpool…. that misses the entire point. Do big friendlies or not at all.
The biggest reason I'm pissed off...
… is that very few people are talking about how well our starting XI played in the 1st half. We gave away one goal, and actually could have been ahead at the half.
Anyone mocking us because our reserves got smacked around by a squad that could have started a Champions League final knows where they can shove their head.
by nickj116 on Jul 21, 2011 10:37 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
well said.
our reserves vs Rooney? haha
Welcome to the Sound Pound...
by SoundPound on Jul 21, 2011 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The problem is..
most people will just see the box score. They wont know that Rooney scored against Zach Scott, with Terry Boss in goal.
by MurrayD on Jul 21, 2011 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
but a problem for who?
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
So, are you going to tell Sky Sports "where they can shove their head"...?
Because their reports to a worldwide audience don’t make any distinction between first and second half, merely that ManU humiliated a pathetic Sounders team. Full stop.
Actually, they did.
Their recap that I read was very quick to point out that the first half was quite competitive.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 21, 2011 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm still embarassed
Brought a group of first timers out. I didn’t expect to beat Man U, but come on. It feels like when you refer a friend to a business and the business rips them off.
For the price – it’s great to see Man U play, but not at the expense of my club’s pride. Make all the excuses you want, the fact is a team like New England kept it respectable. Chivas only conceeded 3 goals to Real Madrid. Look at the scores from every other friendly the past few days; most, if not all, were respectable. Depth argument is sort-of weak since no other MLS team was blown out. Aren’t we supposed to have better reserves than all the other MLS sides anyway?
I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen a margin this big between a EPL and MLS team. If this somehow messes up our current form I’ll be even more irritated. ‘Disappointed’ is probably the best one-word answer.
just as clarification
That was THE Chivas that played Real Madrid, not Chivas USA.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions
At the same time, look at some of the comments from the players
Most of the visiting side seems to think it was closer than the scoreline indicated and Lindegaard specifically calls out New England as having played worse than the Sounders did.
Certainly I think we were a little unlucky both to not score and for Manchester United to have played as many starters in the second half as they did.
Spare me the "closer than the scoreline indicated"...
Dominant teams always say that about the doormats they just kicked from pillar to post. They never mean it. Deep down, you can be sure the ManU players and coaches are chortling over the ass-kicking they gave sad-sack Seattle.
hahahah
what? Yeah, I’m sure Wayne and Giggsy are high fiving each other over scoring 6 goals against an MLS reserve team.
High-fiving each other? No...
…but smirking at our ineptitude? Almost certainly.
It will make it all the sweeter when we finally make the club world cup
And beat ManU in a game that matters. Someday, someday, sweet revenge! :-)
Hope that's in our lifetime!
It took Man U over 100 years to get to this point, haha ;-)
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions
It'll need many years...
…because expecting a MLS team to be competitive at CWC level, except as the biggest of upsets, won’t happen until we can consistently field comparable teams, which won’t happen until we have payrolls that are somewhat more than a little under 1% of those of the sides we’re facing. I’m not saying we need to be spending $300 million on payroll like ManU, but at least somewhere in the tens of millions rather than the $2.5 million or so with which we are currently stuck. In their presentation to the World Cup selection committee, the USSF claimed that we would be at a point of equivalency to some of the world’s top leagues (not, I would assume, England, Spain, Italy, France, or Germany, but at least some of the other European or South American leagues) by 2022. I hope they’re right, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it takes at least another quarter-century until we’ve achieved that sort of parity.
You recognize that the big European clubs don't give a crap about the CWC, right?
We have GOT to stop defining ourselves in these terms. It’s poison.
This is a damned fine MLS team, and while I think it’s a fine and admirable thing to demand progress, to demand better, I just feel like so many people are focusing on the absolute wrong things.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 21, 2011 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
"Aren’t we supposed to have better reserves than all the other MLS sides anyway?"
Who said that? If it’s based off of reserve league play, then no, definitely not. We’re using 10 year MLS vets on our reserve team while other teams are using Academy kids. After the first 18 the roster drops off a cliff.
Our reserves are undefeated. How does that mean they're not better than others?
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Because other teams don't use the reserve league the way we do
You would expect a 32 year old veteran to outplay a 17 year old.
I'm okay with the way we are using it this year
we are keeping our backups strong as we deal with USOC and head into CCL play. This team needs the depth this year. I would like to see more use of academy players next year though.
Completely agree
we put different priorities on the USOC and CCL than other teams do. I get why the Sounder are doing it, I just think the teams we have playing in “reserve” games are a much higher level than other teams, and it’s not because the other teams couldn’t match the quality, it’s that they have different priorities.
Imagine if we had two A teams like United
Sigi is actually doing the best job in MLS right now molding with the clay he is given. He is trying to use the reserves more to mold our second team than to train our young recruits. And our academy has its own league.
by Brougham Hooligan on Jul 21, 2011 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Yup
Again, you’re totally right. I just think its misleading to look at reserve scores and make a conclusion about the talent level past the starting 11, especially when guys like Levesque get quite a bit of PT for the reserves.
I wouldn't go making the world's strongest conclusions
But if other teams felt that they had non-Academy players pushing for first-team time, I’d imagine they’d be getting more time in reserve games. I think it’s safe to say we have above-average depth, based in part on the reserve league games. I wouldn’t say I have enough info to claim we’re best or second-best or whatever.
I actually think these Reserves are best right now
Whether other teams are doing a better job of developing for the future is certainly up for debate. But the reason they are playing those Academy players is because either their first teams are very injured, or not very good and so an Academy guy might make the step-up soon.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
We're using it that way...
Because those are our actual reserves. AFIK, that’s what other teams do, too.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
It doesn't matter how old they are.
Better is better.
I can understand you not liking that some older players are getting time in reserve league action over younger players but this comment is strange.
"The fans are excited. And the stadium, well, it ignites with explosion."
by DarthGreedo on Jul 21, 2011 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Then to make my point in your terms
Our 32 year olds couldn’t do as well against Man U as any of the other MLS teams’ 17 year olds could do against their respective friendly opponents. Again, just disappointing relative to our peers in the league, that’s all
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn't even call it the "reserves"
as much as I would call it Zach Schott, Taylor Graham and Michael Tetteh. Those three were just horrendous and were involved in nearly all of Man U’s scoring.
Every team has players of that quality on the roster
Our depth was just slaughtered far worse than other teams in MLS. Getting beat 7-0 stings, and circumstances are never etched in history.
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Not every team
has Wayne Rooney going against that level of talent. If we had kept our defense in and subbed the entire rest of the team it wouldn’t have been worse than 3-0
this is simply untrue...
…judging from the actual games and rosters that see the field, I have not seen any significant difference between the Sounders reserves and most MLS squads.
Really?
So having the best combined record in USOC+MLS+Reserves means what?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
That it's a deep team?
The reserves starting eleven tends to include about 4-5 young, developing players using any particular definition. The Galaxy use about the same number, mixing it up with such young talent as Hejduk and Kirovski. Their reserves have been awful.
One could fairly argue that L.A is another example of an older squad, but the point nevertheless remains that
1. playing recovering or out-of-form first-stringers (Jaqua) is not exclusive to the Sounders
2. playing veterans who are second or third-string (Gonzalez, Noonan, Ianni) is common throughout reserve league play
3. fringe MLS journeymen (Graham, Scott) should not automatically be assumed to play at a higher level than developmental players
4. The Sounders have given substantial minutes to developmental players, and a great deal of their reserve league success has been built off of strong performances by these players (Neagle, Fucito, Tetteh, Carrasco, Estrada, Montano).
I would argue the reserve league success has been built off of strong play by category 4 and the strength of category two. Arguing that the squad is somehow built differently would falsely attribute that success to category 3.
I didn't say differently
but better.
How else would you make the claim that the Sounders aren’t a deep team for MLS?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I don't think we're arguing with each other
I was responding to Tank’s comment:
Because other teams don’t use the reserve league the way we do… You would expect a 32 year old veteran to outplay a 17 year old.
My response was that the reserve team is succeeding because we have depth that could reasonably start for MLS teams (Ianni, Gonzalez/Wahl, Fucito) and the developmental players are succeeding, not because of differently constructing the reserves around veteran squad filler (Graham, Scott, Levesque). I think you and I are broadly in agreement.
Ah, yes
We are on the same page
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Rooney against a bunch of MLS backups?
that shouldn’t have been allowed. I hope he feels like a badass after last night.
I think our first XI was spectacular, they could have gone into the half up 2-1. I see the 7-0 score line as a bunch of star players scoring 6 in a half on MLS backups. Good for them.
Welcome to the Sound Pound...
Yup, my biggest complaint
was Rooney and several other potential starters coming into a game they had utterly dominated up to that point. Yup, the score was only 1-0, but it could have been far worse. Man U shows that it isn’t interesting in building bridges or good will, but merely winning every game they play, no matter who the patsy is. A club I used to like is now on my “classless bunch of louts” list. A classy team would have simply played possession, slowed the game down, and ran the clock out. Considering the schedule we face, I am not in favor of ever doing another friendly during the season.
Mission accomplished then
Always good to have another ManU hater.
In fairness to Sir Alex, it is their pre-season and he wanted to get a look at a few of their younger players against good competition, thus Rooney got his work in during the 2nd half.
by look4wrd on Jul 21, 2011 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
ManU was never my favorite team
I hardly ever watch EPL games so I don’t really have favorites and hated teams. Until now. I didn’t have a problem with United playing to win in the 2nd half. Sir Alex might have been kind and pulled Rooney around the 75th after he had a good run and a couple goals. It’s not like he needs to decide if Rooney makes the first team for next season.
My biggest problem was all the United fans acting like yahoos at the C-link. Nothing I hate more than fans rubbing it in the home-teams face after a drubbing. Even worse when those fans live in the same city as the home team. Much, much worse when they’re cheering a team from a different damn country.
by Dizzo on Jul 21, 2011 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 14 recs
How in the name of god
did Manchester United “utterly dominate” the first half? Were we watching the same game?
Some of the quotes
I feel like a PR, but I feel the the keeper actually meant it when he says we’re better than the other MLS teams he’s faced and it was nice that he liked our build up rather than kick and run.
The big thing I get from the quotes is that MLS is really, really off their radar
Not that this should be at all surprising, but I think it goes to show that not all big DP signings really have much of an idea what they are getting themselves into when they come over to MLS. I agree, though, that Lindegaard’s comments seemed pretty straightforward and honest.
To me, I'm not against the big-name friendlies
I just think that after this game, if we’re going to bring in a big name again, I’d like to make sure we can play our starters for more of the game. Maybe a 60/30 split instead of 45/45.
I agree
as long as the friendly comes at a convenient time, start making the subs you would have made in a regular game around the 50th minute.
What I’d have liked to see: Fucito for Levesque and Neagle for Fernandez at 50, Evans for Friberg, Noonan for Rosales, and Scott for a defender in the 55th, Jaqua for Montero, Carrasco for Alonso, and Tetteh for a defender in the 60th. Graham and maybe another defender in the 65th. Montano, Ford, Ngasa, Estrada, Seamon, et al., in the 75th or 80th.
I thought SAF's comments about the crowd were interesting
I still see the logic in keeping supporters’ sections separated from one another, but it’ll be too bad when everyone needs to be more strictly separated (which is probably inevitable.)
Estimated transfer fee
$74,989,508 to be paid to Man Utd. And that does not include his salary. That’s over 6 times our entire teams transfer value
by Brougham Hooligan on Jul 21, 2011 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Sounds like
Paul Allen may have to sell one of his Yachts.
by MurrayD on Jul 21, 2011 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You think Ferguson would just take it instead?
I hear there is a decent amount of water around that England place.
Headlines
Wayne Rooney traded from ManU to Seattle Sounders FC for a Yacht. Sir Alex remarks “Ive always fancied a nice cruise”. Seattle fans might remember Rooney from the 3 goals he scored against their reserve players in a meaningless exhibition game over the last summer.
a couple points of disagreement
“Those people aren’t looking for reasons to watch MLS, they are looking for excuses not to watch.” I have taken cynical friends, who ridiculed American soccer, to Sounders matches before, and they’ve come away loving it and attending more matches. So from personal experience, I know this not to be true. They can be sold.
“Friendlies are not about measuring yourself, they are about putting on a show.” However, in the previous paragraph you stated, “They stood toe-to-toe with one of the best teams in the world and held their own for a half.” I think you got it right the first time. It doesn’t matter the circumstance, when you play the best you want to see how you stack up against them.
But that's not why we play...
We don’t bring in ManUtd to measure ourself against them. If we measure up well, that’s a bonus. Not the focus.
As to your friends being converted, I’m not saying it’s impossible. But bringing them to a MLS match is a far more effective way to do it than bringing them to a friendly.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The measuring is inevitable.
You can’t avoid it. Only the most level-headed fans truly understand perspective.
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
And
“Fan” and “level head” don’t often go together :-)
by TheTank123 on Jul 21, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You converted someone by bringing them to a league game
That has no relationship to fans of an opposing team coming to a friendly.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I converted a couple with the Chelsea friendly
True, the other cases were MLS matches.
I like the Idea...
of opening up more seats for select MLS matches (kind of like this year, but without the friendly). I think for a few games, PDX/VAN/LA we could draw more local people to experience an MLS atmosphere. This seems like a much better way to grow the brand. The first year i was at the Cheslea friendly and it was fun. But after attending 1 MLS game i had to add my name STH wating list. Been a STH ever since.
Not gettin what Sigi had in mind here
With the wholesale substitutions, he lost the ability to easy single out individuals to evaluate them and instead created wholesale chaos in the second half. One would think that he would like to plug individuals in slowly and see how the puzzle changes. Instead he admittedly viewed the whole affair as a “reward” to all the players.
So I am left with the question: “Does this make me want to visit Tanzania more or less now?”
by Brougham Hooligan on Jul 21, 2011 12:00 PM PDT reply actions
I'm sure Boss feels very well rewarded
It’s always nice to give up 6 goals. Or Estrada. I’m sure he had a great time playing well out of position against one of the best teams in the world. The only guy from the 2nd half who got a real reward out of the whole thing was Graham who snagged Rooney’s jersey. /sarcasm off
by Dizzo on Jul 21, 2011 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Haha, I don't think I've ever seen a player chase down another player for a jersey so close to the whistle
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Did you see the look on Rooneys face?
It certainly looked like he was hoping he’d be badgered by someone else….
Ya think? WR: "Who are you again? Where's Mauro?"
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Hahaha exactly
Either him, Fredy or Osvaldo.
BTW, if Osvaldo doesn’t get a shot at Europe at some point, it’s a travesty.
Honey Badger will be gone to Europe after this season...
You can bank on it.
I was wondering about this...
Would Ozzie have trouble getting a work permit in Europe due to his special status here in the US. He is a Political Refugee from what i remember. Im just wondering if this would make it hard for him to move.
he probably would
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions
If a big enough team wants him...
…I’m sure the wheels can be greased easily enough.
I wish we could
get back to talking about what moves Hanauer has been working on for the transfer window. I feel like he should announce something soon, just so that we have something else to talk about.
I read in a German article yesterday that Hoffenheim is expecting Tagoe to be traded, and that they’re currently negotiating with a specific team and are close to a deal, maybe it’s the Sounders :)
Agree that a splashy transfer right now
would be the best PR move to wash this taste from the Rave Green nation’s mouth.
by Brougham Hooligan on Jul 21, 2011 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't get
why ManU didn’t play their entire first team from the opening whistle? It seems like the coaches for the teams either were on different pages or didn’t care what the other side was planning personnel-wise.
That seems odd to me.
by wannascribble on Jul 21, 2011 12:04 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
i think SAF was fiddling with combinations
It’s a preseason game for them, let’s not forget.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fair enough
You’re right in that they don’t have an obligation to rearrange their preseason tinkering for us.
Not sure about this, but maybe would have liked us to mix up starters as well. I’m bummed there wasn’t 45 minutes of Badger v. Rooney
by wannascribble on Jul 21, 2011 12:54 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
some of the forwards in the first half were competing for roster spots..
so SAF probably wanted to see how they reacted against a stronger opponent.
And then since people payed money to see Rooney he brought in Rooney for the second half
by Sandra_R on Jul 21, 2011 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Backups is a strong word
Taylor Graham, Michael Tetteh, David Estrada, Mike Seamon, Miguel Montano, can you even call these guys backups? How many MLS minutes have these guys logged this year? This is the reason I’m not one bit embarrassed. These guys barely play for the Sounders, I love them all the same and I mean no disrespect, but they are not an indication of the talent of this team. You can almost throw Boss and Scott into this group too, they’re bodies that are required to make up a team and that may develop into real players some day (or in Graham’s case, retire soon). I know the masses won’t care about this, but I say bugger anyone who was ‘embarrassed or shamed’ by that game yesterday.
This game was like a nice spanking
it stings pretty bad, and I wouldn’t want one every week, but it was pleasurable in an odd way.
I think it's commendable what Sigi did
to give everybody some minutes. Sucks it turned out the way it did, but that’s a cool thing for him to do, at the very least.
by chrisperry1983 on Jul 21, 2011 12:32 PM PDT reply actions
With rewards like this
who needs punishments?
by Philip Mueller on Jul 21, 2011 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
I think that you touched on a key point.
The issue in the game was the timing and pattern of substitutions. Generally in these sorts of things everybody pulls the starters after either halftime or maybe 60 minutes and then the benches get to play each other. In this case Fergie mixed it up and put in some of his better attacking players at the half in Rooney and Park while we took our starting defense off the field.
While I agree that leaving the starters on longer would have prolonged how long we were competitive, they still would have come off at some point and Park and Rooney would have remained. Once our starting D came off they were scoring at will. The only difference really would have been how much time the foxes got to watch the henhouse. I think Man U showed they didn’t need too much.
For this reason I can understand how some people are more upset at Ferguson than anything else. There are guidelines to how these usually go, and Ferguson stepped outside those guidelines by bringing in first team players after the half. Whether he did it for competitive reasons or not I can’t really say. In any event, I think Sigi falling on his sword was unnecessary. He did in this match what he’s done in just about every other friendly he’s played. Ferguson just wasn’t on the same page.
It was definitely a 'show'
But more like a horror show in a Roman colluseum where people get to watch a guy torn limb from limb by a hungry lion. It stopped being fun when we lost out sword and shield and just felt like carnage. I paid $150 bucks as a STH to watch a team I love get badly abused. I won’t be doing this again. It’s good that Sigi has acknowledged his tactics were poor and that the fans should not have to watch that.
by Zakuani11Fan on Jul 21, 2011 12:35 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 2 recs
why not just skip these mid-season friendlies altogether
seriously, lets cut the rationalizations here… first and foremost is the very issue that these matches exist. If the FO wants to whore out there club to set an attendance record then I would rather empty the bench at halftime. Our starters have been getting run ragged with a busy July so far and fatigue can lead to injuries, so the “week off” argument doesn’t fly with me right now…
I don’t get it, there are better ways to “showcase” the team and the game – and to everyone who gets their panties in a bunch about too many away supporters if we open up the entire stadium for Cascadia matches, hope you saw all the red shirts last night and heard how loud it got after every ManU goal… just sayin’
...and you will hear us scream
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
This is a business.
in the same way that the Metropolitan Museum of Art is a "business"
like I said, let’s cut the rationalizations… getting pretty tired of the $$$ one…there are more dignified revenue streams to tap into…
...and you will hear us scream
by malcontentjake on Jul 21, 2011 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Are there?
Please expand on the “dignified revenue streams” that we have at our disposal.
by TheTank123 on Jul 21, 2011 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
two things
I’m pretty sure you know where S@H stands, in general, on the midseason friendlies thing.
Two, you aren’t really comparing the atmosphere at a friendly to one at a high-tension derby are you? I think we’re generally on the same side when it comes to allowing more away support, but this is not the best example.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
it would have been nice to have stuck everyone in red into some corner of the upper deck
at least the scum would’ve brought some atmosphere… the BIRG-ers last night would’ve just sat there and bemoaned they weren’t close enough to hound for autographs and handouts.
...and you will hear us scream
by malcontentjake on Jul 21, 2011 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions
we wont be playing them again any time soon...
so who cares!
How do I compare Man. U and Seattle? I DONT!! Besides the fact that I love the Sounders and I could care less about MU.
I’m glad that Sigi emptied the bench and gave all the kids a chance to get on the field – that’s the spirit of a friendly.
A respectable first half and we escaped without injury – that’s enough to satisfy me. Now let’s move on with the rest of our competitions that matter.
One of our big guns goes down playing 70+ min
and everybody is calling for Sigi’s head. IT WAS A FRIENDLY. Get the hell over it already.
by 509er on Jul 21, 2011 1:48 PM PDT reply actions 4 recs
now this is very true
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought our starting 11 looked just fine
1) We need to win something significant this year, because next year we will be without the services of Alonso. I’ll be shocked if he isn’t playing in Europe next year. He’s undersized for an EPL midfielder, but someone will rightly see his value. After watch the 1st half of last night’s game and the 10 previous games, we have a legit shot this year to win the MLS cup.
2) Taylor Graham is a great guy. A month ago he did a coaching clinic for my 9 year old daughter’s team. He was fantastic with them. So I’ll fight anyone who wants to say something personal about him. Last night he saw his first minutes of the year against Wayne ’effing Rooney. What happened after that was entirely predictable. That places him (and the rest of the Sounders bench) in extremely good company.
3) Bruce Arena correctly observed that the MLS is at a significant disadvantage to the European teams that come over here because their starters know that they are only going to play for 45 minutes, and because their benches are so much deeper that ours. Our entire payroll is $3.5 million or so. Rooney’s makes at least 3 times that if not much more.
4) The ManU fans are as obnoxious as those twits who show up for the Red Sox games in full regalia. Anyone who roots for a non-hometown team just because they have a big brand is without a soul.
Good points
However, I don’t see Alonso leaving next year. He’s an amazing midfielder, but there’s a few reasons that the Sounders should be able to hold onto him. He’s a Cuban defector which makes it easier for him to gain residency here in the states, but might make it more difficult for him to get a visa abroad. Particularly to the EPL which basis their visa decisions for soccer players on national team playing time and national team rank (he’s tied to the Cuban team and can’t play for them).
Also, there’s still some room for the Sounders to give him a raise to keep him (even without using a DP slot). I personally think the Sounders would try to trade Montero or Flaco to Europe to free up a DP slot for Alonso rather than let him go. He’s vital to the Sounders.
I thought Graham was great for us the last two years. Very underrated in Open Cup and CCL games last year. However, this year he hasn’t looked sharp at all. It’s purely a soccer-related observation.
Do you really think that if, say, ManU, AC Milan, or Barca were to want Alonso...
…that they wouldn’t find some way to get their government to “cooperate?” And, if he may have visa problems, how does he manage to get to play in Mexico, Panama, El Salvador, Honduras, or Costa Rica — all countries with better ties to Cuba than we do?
In many countries it is quite different to visit on a short trip
and living there.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Not just Alonso...
I’m pretty sure we’re going to lose Flaco (who, at least, is still under contract for next year, so we’ll get some transfer $$$ and a free DP slot for him) and Rosales (who isn’t, so we’ll get nothing). And, if Fredy continues his hot streak, I’m sure someone will offer him something — although, once again, they’ll have to pony up for him as well, plus we’ll be able to sign an additional DP.
That’s one sobering thought: with those players, plus Keller, gone, the 2012 Sounders may well look a lot like the XI you saw down on the pitch in the second half last night. We better try to win everything we can this year, because we may be facing a rebuilding season or two. Enjoy it while it lasts, despite the bad taste from last night.
Man, you are a ray of sunshine...
First off, alonso, fredy and Flaco are all under contract for at least a couple years. If any of them leave, we’re getting handsomely compensated. Second off, Rosales isn’t going anywhere.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions
You forgot Zakuani, Hurtado, and Neagle
We’ll be lucky if we don’t lose our whole team!
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Realistically we'll probably just be relegated
Nos Audietis
by sidereal on Jul 21, 2011 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
This team isn't stupid
Which is proven by the way that they have handled this team after losing Nkufo, after the huge string of injuries, and they are still competitive. You don’t luck into this position, it’s earned. We are going strong in MLS and US Open Cup and I have high hopes for CONCACAF.
The FO knows where this team stands and whats going on with it’s players better then anyone. Even if a team comes after Montero or Alonso as long as they are under contract a deal isn’t going to happen overnight. They wont trade away the player without making sure we have a way to keep this team strong.
Have faith, this isn’t a run of the mill team.
Doesn't it?
This team has overcome soo many things that are far more damaging then losing 7-0 to the second best team in the world and it seems like some people have forgotten that.
Rewards
I think Sigi had three misplaced rewards last night. He said he wanted to reward his players. He pulls the majority of guys who have been winning games for us at half, instead of leaving them in for first 15 of the second. Seems like their reward would be to start the second half and weather an obviously coming storm out of the gates. Keepign their good performance intact. Then, give way to the second team. Not to mention everyone knew that Rooney was coming. I would think the starters would have liked to be on the same field. ( Maybe they don’t care. I don’t know) Second, the reward should have been a standing ovation as they were taken off slowly. A standing O from 67,000. I think they would have liked that. Instead, they dissapear mysterioulsy into the wind at halftime. The third was not a reward Sigi talked about, but how about the reward for the fans? Like Jeramiah’s article stated. The reward again was misplaced. Instead of allowing our fans more of the show and managing the first part of the second half. Sigi put the guns away and rewarded the Man U fans.
by Camnehem on Jul 21, 2011 1:53 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
First Fight
I saw my first fight at a sounders game. Some Man U fans in front of me got in to it with a couple sounders fans and they were ejected. Never seen anything close to that until last night
Im surprised
there wasnt a fight in my section as well. This one ManU fan was a total Ahole, completly classless. Luckily the sounders fans that surrounded him just ignored him. Im glad our fans had some class.
I had a drunk MU fan sitting right behind me (317)
Not only did he act like a douche the whole game, he puked in the 87th minute, splattering the guys sitting next to me.
by Philip Mueller on Jul 21, 2011 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Was anyone else here at the Chelsea friendly two years ago?
If you were you could see a world of difference between the 09 Sounders and our 11 bunch. The 09 squad looked lost and utterly out gunned from the opening kick. Last night you saw our starters take it to the second best club in the world for 45 minutes. Even if you’re just a casual fan, what you saw in the first half last night should make you highly encouraged.
If not a little proud.
Friendlies still suck though. At least no one got hurt.
by DaveValleDrinkNight on Jul 21, 2011 2:14 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
You're kidding, right?
I was at the Chelsea match. While we conceded a couple of goals, we played them pretty competitively in the first half, with several good chances ourselves. Then, when we brought in the subs at halftime, they played the Blues dead even the rest of the way. The best of yesterday’s match was no better, and the rest was infinitely worse, than what happened in 2009. At least, that time, we could leave with our heads held high.
you r opinion seems to be in the minority
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I was at the Chelsea match
and I think the scoreline there was much different for good reasons. They had much more of a C team in the second half, they looked like it was their first week of practice, and they looked like they were taking it easy.
In contrast, Man U had a bunch of regular EPL/CL starters playing in the 2nd half, and never took their feet off the pedal. They were giving our guys space (no real tough tackles), but were pulling no punches in taking the ball to goal. Our first team played Man U much more closely, and were inches from either Montero or Riley tying it up. I really wanted to see Montero play in the 2nd half because I felt a goal was coming for him if he had a bit more time to work.
I was there
His “opinion” sounds pretty accurate to me, at least for the first half. The substitutions were more staggered, as I recell, though. Boss had a much better day, too. Made a couple nice saves in the second half, as I recall.
The Barcelona match was something else all together. Both we and Barcelona made wholesale changes at half…but Barcelona’s reservescould beat most EPL sides. It’s not much of an exaggeration to say we touched the ball maybe twice in the second half of that match.
maybe i was getting it confused with barca opinions
everyone i’ve talked to said second half was one long game of keep away
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Jul 21, 2011 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, Barca's second half was pretty gruesome...
Not by the standards of last night, but in the sense that our subs were utterly outclassed. I think it was only because Barca decided to be sportsmanlike that they restricted themselves to scoring only twice more. Too bad ManU didn’t have the same class, but, then again, when you’re only the second-best team in Europe instead of the best, you have to take your frustrations out on someone. ;-)
It has nothing to do with sportsmanship.
It has to do with the difference between what United are trying to get in shape to do and what Barca are trying to get in shape to do.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 21, 2011 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Was I at a match in a parallel universe?
The first 45 was some great soccer by our boys.
----
@LikkitP
After his third goal...
I expected Rooney to run to the center circle take off his shirt and yell “ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED”
by MurrayD on Jul 21, 2011 2:34 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Oh wow, rec'd so hard
This got me to sign in – cheers!
by BrooklynPreacher on Jul 21, 2011 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Random thoughts... take them or leave them...
My 2 cents:
1) I really thought we played outstanding in the in first half. Other than not scoring, I think that was some of the best I’ve seen out boys play in any game, hands down. Connecting, passes, the vision, etc. Even taking some unexpected shots.
2) I wish Sigi would have left the starters in until the ~70 minute. I don’t like getting blown out. But I say this because I wanted to keep watching our guys play since we really seemed to be clicking.
3) ManU didn’t start their top XI, which might be partly why we looked so good in the first half. I don’t know ManU well enough to know who starts regularly who started this game, but I do know Rooney, Park and Fedinand are regular starters who came on in the second half. I’m sure the reasoning for this, in part was they would field a "B" team against our "A" team so it wouldn’t be a complete blowout in the first half, then they would field a "B" team against our "C" team in the second half. If I remember correctly, the only person who started who also started the second half was Riley.
4) I’m not a fan of friendlies, and I opted out of this from my season ticket package, although I did go out of my way to watch it on TV. Having said that I think right now doing friendlies like MLS does is still helping grow the game in the US. I’m just not sure how much. It wasn’t too long ago that the MLS was packing games with a game of two non-MLS teams. I think we’ve taken that baby step of now MLS is playing that non-MLS team. I can’t wait until we take the next step and get pumped for the CCL competition.
by SoundersForever on Jul 21, 2011 3:29 PM PDT reply actions
Uh...
I don’t know ManU well enough to know who starts regularly who started this game, but I do know Rooney, Park and Fedinand are regular starters who came on in the second half.
…Rio Ferdinand was in the starting XI for them.
The back line were all starters in the first half
Only two (possibly one and a half, if you believe Giggs will be replaced) other players in their starting eleven are first-choice.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 21, 2011 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Even if Giggs does get replaced...
I think you had to start him — he’s as much the face of ManU as anyone.
That's neither here nor there, really
The point is that while United fielded a good team, the forward players were mostly second-string.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 22, 2011 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Man U started the game with 10 of their normal rotational first-teamers
Only Rooney, Berbatov, and Chicharito were missing from your typical starting XI, and the last two didn’t even travel. It was pretty damn close to a full-strength Man U side (remember Scholes and Van der Sar retired. Their replacements were who we saw).
On that point, I was ecstatic with our first half. Would have liked to see our #1’s go at least 70 though. They were hanging very well with a (admittedly) rusty Man U side.
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions
We can wring our hands all we want...
… all that matters is whether this affects our current form. A win at San Fran, and I will forget all about this debacle. And that’s the best word I can think to describe that second half.
by Jack Brando on Jul 21, 2011 5:01 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
Of course, although it has no connection to last night's game...
…having both the Galaxy and FCD pick up three points on us is like adding insult to injury…or, realistically speaking, the other way around.
Because the Sounders can control results in games in which they don't play?
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I think what he's saying is we could have taken some solace by our closest competitors dropping points
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Exactly...
…or, at least, not both of them picking up all three while we were getting spanked in a non-league match.
No, all I was saying...
…was “as if the news wasn’t bad enough…” It was meant tongue-in-cheek.
This is why friendlies suck
- Sigi did the right thing pulling our top starters — we have a lot of REAL games coming up in the Champions League and the MLS. Not to mention about 10,000 air miles in the next week. Sigi’s trying to win games that matter.
- Old Whiskyface is a butthole for playing Rooney and Park after we pulled our real squad. What do you think he was learning with Rooney on Scott, Rooney on Graham?
- Yeah, they’re better than us. They’re frigging Man United, of course they’re better than us. Most of the players out there will have earned more wages by August 1st than our average player will earn in a year.
- This was not a serious contest, it was a dog-and-pony show, and dog-and-pony shows put Sounders and MLS in a bad light no matter how it turns out.
- There’s only one thing on earth worse than Man United fans, and that’s Man United fans 6,000 miles from Old Trafford. People wearing red in our stadium make me sick.
So Sir Alex is not to let Rooney & Park get any preseason training in?
I’m sure 67,000 people probably would have been more upset had Rooney not played at all.
I don’t blame Sir Alex for not taking his foot off the pedal – remember, that’s what 30k specifically came to see.
by ABTsportsline on Jul 21, 2011 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions
A day afterwards, the 7 doesn't bother me...
as much as the zero. If we have to keep scheduling these friendlies against top world clubs, it would be nice if we could score a goal in one of them.
by central_scrutinizer on Jul 21, 2011 10:41 PM PDT reply actions

by 





















