Seattle Sounders Still Alive For Five
Last night was a pretty cool experience, above and beyond the result. Thanks to Dave (and Arlo, in a roundabout way) it was my first foray into GA. That is certainly a unique experience that I'd recommend to anyone (except maybe those bringing young children). On the one hand, it's a lot of work jumping around and singing for 90 minutes (or 120 minutes, if your team decides to let some Panamanian minnows into the game for some reason) and you lose some perspective on the match — both visually and emotionally — but you're putting yourself in the middle of the cauldron of fan energy that defines the fan experience in Seattle (and elsewhere in Cascadia). I couldn't do it every match, but it was a great evening, particularly with Dave along with Aaron and Jennifer on the other side, who were basically the party that rocks the party.
But even from the slightly chaotic perspective of GA a few things were clear from last night's match. One is that the refereeing was beyond awful. It was probably hard to control a game where one team was desperate to waste time from the first minute, but 'controlling' it by letting the team do that without any consequence, calling chippy fouls for the time-wasters, then letting hard fouls against the home team go, then distributing pretty random yellow cards (like to Rosales for a handball in the middle of the pitch or to Keller for who knows what) was a pretty bizarre strategy. It's easy to blame some kind of bias for a Costa Rican ref working a game between North Americans and Central Americans, but Solis called plenty of fouls and 50/50 balls for the Sounders that he didn't have to if he had some secret pro-San Francisco agenda. I don't think he was corrupt. He was just incompetent. Which is doubly weird when you realize that this is probably the second time you've seen Jeffrey Solis officiate a game with Americans this season. He was also in charge of the Gold Cup match between the US and Guadeloupe, and while that game also featured a home team that got a ton of chances but barely squeaked by inferior opposition, I don't remember it for being poorly officiated.
The other thing that stood out was Seattle's poor finishing. I generally take a statistical approach to these things and assume most of it balances out in the end, but I'm not blind. I doubt it's lack of skill. We all know these attackers can be devastating shooters on good days. I suspect at this point it's a sort of feedback loop, where players that feel they have to aim their shots perfectly just to get one in will tend to over-aim and the shots will be weak or straight at the keeper. And that just makes their confidence worse. Fredy Montero tries to chip the keeper about ten times as often as he should, probably because he's sick of his straight shots getting blocked or saved. Now it's up to Sigi to sort out the attacking confidence of the current players and Adrian to bring in someone who already has it.
Regardless of the particulars of the match, the Sounders won and are still alive in the CONCACAF Champions League, which is a pretty tremendous achievement. It's easy to get lost in the day to day twists and turns of the team, but if you step back and consider that the team lost its best (or second best, depending on the day) attacking player for the season, lost a DP striker on the opening day of the season, and lost his replacement for over half the season and is still in contention for every trophy that was on the calendar when the season opened, you can't help but be impressed at our depth and commitment.
If you count the MLS regular season trophy, the playoff trophy, the Confederation's CCL trophy, the Open Cup, and the vanity rivalry trophy (which most teams have) then there are 5 trophies up for grabs when the season starts. And only the Sounders and one other team — FC Dallas — are still in the running for all of them. The Galaxy are no longer in the US Open Cup. Nor Real Salt Lake, who also don't qualify for the CCL this season. Everyone else is realistically eliminated from the race for the Supporter's Shield. That's pretty select company, and it's something the team has achieved in only their third year of existence, which reflects this team and this community's commitment to winning — in every competition, every time they step on the field. Even against Manchester United, which is why that travesty of a result hit so many fans so hard.
To throw a little data into the conversation — because that's just how I roll — here's a list of those 5 trophies that are still up for grabs and the best odds I can come up with for the Sounders winning each of them. For competitions involving regular MLS play (which includes the Shield, MLS Cup, and the Cascadia Cup) I use the simulation we already run which takes into account schedule, scoring prowess, defense, and so on. For the others I just give each team a 50/50 chance to win each match, which is probably generous in the CCL in a group with Monterrey and pessimistic in the USOC where we have home field advantage in the semifinals and a good chance at it in the final.
| Competition | Sounders' Odds |
|---|---|
| Cascadia Cup | 61.6% |
| US Open Cup | 25.0% |
| MLS Cup | 9.5% |
| CCL Trophy | 6.3% |
| Supporters Shield | 6.0% |
Some odds are longer than others, but we still have at least a 5% shot at every cup on the table which is not something to take for granted.
70 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Since all of those add up to just over 100%...
Does that mean that we have a 100% chance to win at least one of these? :P JK.
I will be upset if we don't win a trophy too.
But at this point I am not sure that just winning the Cascadia cup will fully satisfy me (despite that being a very likely outcome).
by quacker27 on Aug 4, 2011 7:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Cascadia Cup = icing
Its fun to win, but certainly not a trophy that truly matters
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Aug 5, 2011 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree
I should clarify though. If we do win the CC, I will be happy if we make the USOC final, progress out of the group stage in CCL, and make the Western/Eastern Semi-Finals. Two of those three would probably make me happy with the CC. Without the CC, it would probably take winning one of those or the SS for me to be satisfied with the season.
Two of these four:
1.) Win USOC
2.) Advance to knockout stages of CCL
3.) Win a playoff game/series
4.) Win Cascadia Cup
And I’ll be pretty happy
I'd be happy if we qualify for CCL next year
that means win the USOC, SS, MLS Cup or make the MLS Cup final. I’d like to advance out of the group stages of the CCL and win the Cascadia Cup but I’d trade those to qualify for CCL in 12/13.
by Colin Johnson on Aug 5, 2011 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I wish more importance were placed on the supporters shield. Would it ever be possible to change its name to “League Champions” and keep MLS cup?
No
because that would reduce the impact of MLS’ signature national event.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
right...
because the entire season can’t pull enough viewers outside the NW. I really dislike the familiarity MLS has with NFL in this regard. Not that any American sport actually gives the championship to the team with the best regular season record, but it would be nice to see it mean a hell of a lot more than it does right now for MLS.
I think it already does mean a great deal
And they moved to strengthen it with the new playoff system. SS winner gets to play the weakest WC team that advances. The West SS winner will get to play someone like DC United or Houston in the first round; the runner up gets to play someone like Dallas or Salt Lake. Plus, entry into CCL.
All of those facts aside, there are quite a few people who consider the SS winner the “real” champion, myself included. I’d rather see the Sounders win the SS than any other trophy but the CCL. It has quite a bit of cache and will continue to have it as long as the balanced schedule persists.
Good point
However the name has always bothered me for some reason. Maybe if they just changed that it would “seem” more important.
Just read
that the SS was created by the supporters since the league wanted nothing to do with it. I GET the name now. I have so many issues with the league management and this reinforces my opinion.
It's funny how the league treats it
while the MLS cup earns all the promotions and grandeur, the SS winner gets nearly the same prize and is as or maybe more respected amongst people who understand what it means.
I’d love to see the MLB or NBA give out a similar award.
The SS is even better.
SS gets group entry to CCL. Auto-berth to USOC. MLS Cup winner is guaranteed the former, but not the latter, based only on league table.
And you get a star over the crest
As cool as winning the SS is, no one remembers who won it every year. MLS Cup – despite being of less prestige to supporters – is the champion people remember each year. If you forget, you get that nice little star over the crest.
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions
Maybe we can put a little tree over our crest
for every Cascadia Cup we win
Nos Audietis
by sidereal on Aug 5, 2011 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
After a few years...
We will have a forrest on our crest. Portland will just have stumps.
by MurrayD on Aug 5, 2011 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Even better...
Plant a real tree outside the CLink. Eventually we’ll have a nice victory grove for the kids to play in after games.
by Dizzo on Aug 5, 2011 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
It doesn't work in MLB and NBA
Because you don’t play an even round robin schedule, which is why playoffs exist to begin with.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Aug 5, 2011 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Can we please not have this discussion again?
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Aug 5, 2011 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Five as one
An unbalanced schedule is inevitable in this league so I hope this is as prominent as the SS gets.
...but we have a balanced schedule this year...
The Next Generation of the KC
by s0merand0mdude on Aug 4, 2011 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions
If you want it to mean more
just put more emphasis on it personally. The league will follow suit only when enough people have changed first. But by that time the league putting emphasis on it will not matter.
In other words we do not need them.
Not being familiar with MLS
a few years ago I thought it was something the team with the largest attendance received. If that were the case we’re three-peat’n!
Kind of funny how these are listed in the opposite order of importance that I hold them
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Aug 4, 2011 4:17 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
It's also the opposite order of degree of difficulty. At least until there are more MLS quality teams in Cascadia.
Who else could there be?
Kitsap Pumas? Tacoma Tide? Victoria Highlanders? Boise FC? Borussia Beaverton? Spokane SC? PSV Salem?
I would love to see even more teams in Cascadia, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon, with the way the MLS is structured.
I think he was taking a shot at our neighbors to the north and south.
"But who would listen to Little Old Me anyway?"
-by -Dave Clark
and -thehemogoblin
by Little old me on Aug 4, 2011 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry
I was just being an ass, :-)
"But who would listen to Little Old Me anyway?"
-by -Dave Clark
and -thehemogoblin
by Little old me on Aug 5, 2011 2:33 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Same for me
Though CCL trophy gives the SS a run for most important, in my book.
by Iam333 on Aug 4, 2011 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I actually would prefer the CCL over SS as well
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Aug 4, 2011 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Absolutely
In fact, I can’t believe that there is no place to get a Sounders Jersey with the Champions league badge on it. You have to sew one on yourself.
by Brougham Hooligan on Aug 5, 2011 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions
"Alive for Five" just reminded me of Homer Simpson's "Aww, aww, aww, aww, table five, table five" bit.
Bravo.
For the Shield hunt, it’s obviously helpful that RSL and LA both lost yesterday. Dallas faces LA on Saturday, so I guess we can either hope for a draw or a Dallas win, though I’m not sure which is more beneficial for the Sounders off the top of my head. Probably the Dallas win, since the Sounders still have a chance to earn 3 points against them on the 20th.
by Greg Pirkl Lives on Aug 4, 2011 4:20 PM PDT reply actions
It's a nearly universal sports cliche
when you lose one of your best players for a coach to somehow to say “We’ll just have to figure out a way to win without him/her.” Not all that many teams actually do that. The Sounders definitely have done a fantastic job of it this season so far and, as noted, we’ve lost a lot more than just one very good player.
Heritage Cup makes 6?
Aren’t we still in the running for heritage cup ( former nasl teams with same name) vs San Jose – Portland and Vancouver declined. It’s still a trophy and we won it last year. Least of the least.
I guess?
I think we’re also still in the running for the Indigenous Cup, contested between teams based in cities with Native American names and includes Seattle, Kansas City, Toronto, and Chicago and which I just made up.
I’m not super excited about cups that don’t represent a rivalry or real competition.
Nos Audietis
EA Sports
Thinks Seattle/ San Jose is a rivalry. So it must be true, right?
"But who would listen to Little Old Me anyway?"
-by -Dave Clark
and -thehemogoblin
by Little old me on Aug 4, 2011 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Hopefully that changes in FIFA12..
…how annoying.
Hit me up on Twitter
Staff writer for Managing Madrid
Gotta disagree about the officiating
Though I wouldn’t call it “good”, it was by far NOT the worst officiating I’d ever seen, and it seems like most of the critiques forget the fury of calls in Seattle’s favor in the last 45 minutes of the game. Rosales hand ball? He clearly did it for his favor, just as his flop in the box was just that -a classic flop that only a Argentine (or Uruguayan) could pull off. Keller’s yellow was also justified. Not that I like him getting a card, but we’d just pulled ahead and were delaying the game (and unlike SFFC, we were delaying the game in the last 20 minutes, not the first 20 minutes).
Just my two cents, as if anyone cared…
Keller's Yellow was for dissent
Within seconds of the Yellow for time wasting that came from the denial of a substitution
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
by Dave Clark on Aug 4, 2011 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Both Yellows at the end
were for dissent according to the stat sheet i saw
Someone on the game thread
said “he wanted it” and that was totally true. He was pointing at his captain’s armband while yelling at the ref. Good stuff… as long as he doesn’t get a yellow next match.
Don't think that matters
Aren’t yellows wiped once you hit the group stage? Only a guy like Alonso will miss the next match since he had two yellows during the play-in
I thought the yellows were a bit harsh. Unless the ref had given Friberg a warning prior that none of us saw, I think first offense yellow was a bit harsh – especially since they had been doing it all match.
Anyone notice how miraculously resilient the San Francisco players were to injury once they were behind? No more Panama players rolling around on the pitch once Jaqua put that goal in… Funny how that works!
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I checked the CONCACAF rules and it looks like it does not get wiped out at end of Prelim Round
6.29 Any player to accumulate two single yellow cards in two different matches in the CCL is suspended for the following game. Thereafter, each time a player accumulates two single yellow cards in two different matches, he will be suspended for the following game with the exception that single cautions will be eliminated at the end of the Group Stage and at the end of the Championship Round.
So if I am understanding the rule right, Keller, Parke, Friberg, Rosales and Fernandez would all be suspended following a second card and Alonso is suspended for the 8/16 game.
The complete rules are here.
Nos audietis in somniis, Nos audietis in altum: You will hear us!
Oops! I was a round early
Single yellows get wiped at the end of Group stage – not qualifiers. Got it, thanks!
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
From my view
from the second row right off the south side 18, Rosales got hit pretty hard at the top of the box on that play. No way he could have stayed on his feet.
And about the frieberg card. I assume it was for time wasting right? He obviously had a cramp. He was holding his leg before the play was dead, then when the ball went out he sat down. How many times did san fran players do that? Frieberg should have been allowed to sit there till they brought the streacher out. Why could they have 3 people streachered off the field during the game but we get a card for time wasting? It just blows my mind.
by MurrayD on Aug 4, 2011 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ref and timewasting
The one that got me was when Rosales was down on the pitch and the ref actually ran over a hauled him to his feet when the Sounders were ahead. Instead of letting us waste time he was carding our guys and physically stopping them. Obviously he took a different approach to the Panamanian antics.
The stretchering was getting humorous by the end
Although one of the Panamanian players’ injuries looked fairly legit. Not sure it was stretcher-worthy, but the guy who caught a toe on a slide tackle and rolled all the way over his ankle looked legitimately hurt.
Crying wolf...
If everyone rolls around on the pitch like they got shot each time they fall down, then i dont care when they actually have an injury.
Yeah, I don't think you were watching the same match I was
Rosales was hit plenty hard to go down in the box. Rosales did not intentionally hand that ball at midfield that drew him the yellow. Keller’s yellow was definitely justified, and Friberg sat down because the ref refused to allow a substitution, even though it was a dead ball, not to waste time.
Not for nothing, I don’t think he would have allowed the substitution the second time, but the assistant ref got his attention and was practically waving the sub on himself.
Thought the officiating was awful both ways
But just because of that, doesn’t mean it was good.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Aug 5, 2011 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree...
but i belive San Fran’s dive-a-lot style recieved more benifit than us.
Time Wasting and the South
I think we all know that this is part of the game South of LA. San Fransisco played the act and it was excepted by the ref., who was from the region. Seattle tries and is yellowed. Look at every time their big striker got a knock. He pointed to where it showed a mark. It’s all about show. They are good at it. We are not. The ref. bought it. I would much rather have a team that doesn’t know how to fake. I am very proud of our team.
by Camnehem on Aug 4, 2011 11:29 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
If the Panamanian league fined for simulation
The league would be the richest in the world, and the players the poorest
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions
OT, but I stood in line at the airport Starbucks behind some of the SFFC players Thursday morning.
They were little : )
Was the keeper one of them?
Did you ask him if maybe he wanted to stick around?
Nos Audietis
by sidereal on Aug 5, 2011 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Haha, seriously
I wonder if he’s really that good, or if our attack is just really that bad at putting balls in the net.
I know the answer to the latter
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
He had a lot of great saves
Athletic diving saves aren’t all the positions about, obviously. Just ask Bouna. Maybe he’s bad at organizing the defense or distribution, but he’s got some potential.
Nos Audietis
At the match I was hearing those around me say "we should sign this guy for 2012"
So yeah, his great play in goal was not unnoticed by other Sounder Fans. Can’t say I wasn’t impressed as well. I’m on board with at least giving him a workout, despite his size.
Rimando is small but he’s one of the best in the league.
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
by ABTsportsline on Aug 5, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
It's gotta be the size
During the draft it seemed like you had to be at least 6’2" to get serious consideration. Diego Restrepo had an amazing collegiate career at UVA and didn’t even get a combine invite.
Restrepo’s listed at 6’0". The San Fran keeper was much smaller than that. Rimando is very much the exception that proves the rule in MLS GKs.
by Dizzo on Aug 5, 2011 4:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Nice meeting you Wednesday "Mr. Real"!
The memories are a bit hazy, especially after the game. Being on vacation plus having a Sounders game will do that to you. :) I’ll buy you a beer next time you make it back into the GA.
by SoundersForever on Aug 5, 2011 2:14 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs

by 



















