Sports Business Journal Reporting MLS To Sell 25% Stake In SUM
Daniel Kaplan and John Ourand have joined together in a story to report that Major League Soccer is exploring selling a significant share in Soccer United Marketing. The 25% share is possibly being sold to Providence Equity Partners for between 125 and 150 Million dollars. It turns out big investment firms like to make money, and it seems that MLS through SUM is doing just that right now.
With all the talks about how individual teams may or may not be making money, the narrow salary cap and the absence of fans at what should be high profile games why is it that only 25% of SUM would be worth so much? The answer is quite simple - the World Cup. SUM controls the US TV rights for the next two World Cups already (selling them on to ABC/ESPN). But that isn't their only big property. Turns out some really famous soccer brands are within the SUM umbrella;
all commercial rights to Major League Soccer; the United States Soccer Federation; promotional and marketing rights to Mexican National Team games played in the United States; and the marketing and promotion of the CONCACAF Gold Cup™. Since 2008 SUM oversees a long-term partnership with La Liga’s historic club FC Barcelona, which includes tours of the legendary Spanish club. SUM also manages promotional and marketing rights in the United States for Mexico’s most popular sports team, Club Deportivo Guadalajara (Chivas).
Every MLS ownership group already owns a share of SUM, and they make money from this endeavour. The Mexico v Bosnia-Herzegovinia friendly in Atlanta will make made the Seattle Sounders money. For MLS to explore a sale of this much of their cash cow could indicate a few things about the future of the league and the business of soccer in America.
First, it means that big money sees even more money in soccer in the mid and long-term future. Equity firms don't get involved for quick dollars but with an eye at longer curves. That a major (reported 22Billion in funds) equity firm specializing in global media, entertainment and communications would show interest indicates the fundamental strength of Don Garber's leadership on the business front.
Second, MLS is about to get flooded with money that dwarfs the expansion fees. This one payment would be the equal of adding the Impact, Timbers, Whitecaps and Union - at once. Where MLS founders once lost about 350 Million dollars from founding to 2004, they may have finally cleared those debts. That can change every thing about the way the league works. This is where speculation can get fun.
If the recent expansion fees, SUM payments, MLS on NBC fee and this large injection of cash can clear the debt books the tight salary cap can be loosened by a lot. The complaints about MLS business practices tend to ignore the massive debts, but within the past three years between MLS has had a few hundred million dollars injected into it. When MLS can make salary cap and marketing decisions based on revenue-expense=profit model without a huge cloud a of debt hanging over themselves the potential to become a much better league quickly is no longer laughable.
MLS is on NBC in 2012 for up to 20 Million dollars. They could be about to clear their decades long debts. The US Olympic soccer team is about to be about 50% MLS players, and the British team will have David Beckham. If you are the type to think that things are about to get much better, this is one of the biggest business years yet.
15 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
25% share?
So they are selling 25% of what they own or they are selling 25% of the total ownership of SUM? Who owns the rest? How much will MLS have after selling?
Is MLS selling their share mean SSFC gets less now for these other events? Or does SSFC have their own portion they own and are unaffected directly by this sale?
MLS already doesn't own about 5% of SUM
So yes, each team would make a little less on specific events.
I have to imagine that the 25% being sold is of overall MLS total holdings. Otherwise it would mean that soccer in America is worth tens of billions
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
I'm reading this as SUM is being valued at between $500M and $600M
But the problem here is that the league looks to be giving up 25% of the revenue from SUM for perpetuity for that $125M. I’m not sure that is a good trade-off for the league long term.
That’s 25% of all associated broadcast rights. Not considering depreciation, I wonder why the league would make that trade, but they know the details behind the broadcast rights so they must believe that the future value of those rights is less than $500M to $600M
The tradeoff
depends on what they do with the money. Presumably they’ll use it for investments that they believe will result in more long-term revenue than just the SUM rights. For example, if they use it to dramatically increase the player quality and the league grows substantially because of it, that would be a good use.
Personally, I think they should spend it all on referees.
Nos Audietis
by sidereal on Sep 12, 2011 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
They could also be planning on not making a play for World Cup rights
Which would lower the value of SUM
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
not big difference
if they own 95% of SUM now then it is not much difference. .95*.25= 23.75%
Thanks.
I think what happens with Beckham would be telling
If LAG resigns him for a year at the alleged $8m, basically beating out both Tottenham and QPR, that will show the MLS can and will fight for players it wants to keep. While the MLS refusing to sell Landycakes to Everton was a more subtle version of this, the overt winning of a bidding war for Beckham will only help the MLS profile. People can say that he is 36, past his prime, etc., but Beckham staying (and Keane recently arrived) keeps MLS in the footy rags there and only helps our profile. And at this point, it definitely would not take a huge opening of the salary cap to have profound effects for MLS quality. One thought, maybe MLS could list itself on the Singapore stock exchange? :)
by Brougham Hooligan on Sep 12, 2011 11:15 AM PDT reply actions
Does MLS really need Beckham?
I would say no. We have other stars both young and old whom don’t bring all the Becks-related drama (although I admit this has been a low-drama year by Becks standards). Having Beckham move on to Tottenham or QPR would show the league has moved past the Becks era.
LA need Beckham
Notice this is really their first year with him as as near full participant? He’s been amazing at what he is (top 3 in chances created) and they are having their best season ever.
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
agreed...
MLS doesn’t need beckham, but the Galaxy are definitely better with him than without.
Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.
by Jeremiah Oshan on Sep 12, 2011 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Said the guy who just wrote today
That this Galaxy team may be one of the best MLS teams EVER
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
Mexico vs. Bosnia and Herzegovina friendly was played in 2010,
so it already made Sounders some money. 50,000 people in Georgia Dome.
Funny that was the next one on the calendar
I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart
No, SUM doesn't "control the US tv rights for the next two world cups"
the last world cup SUM owned the rights to was 2006. FIFA sold the rights to 2010 + 2014 directly to ESPN/UNIVISION.
The rights to 2018 and 2022 are yet to be attributed.
By doing this, MLS is effectively forfeiting all future revenue that 25% would've generated for $125-150 million now
Does anybody else see this as risky? Especially as the league grows, as TV contracts go up in value, as the league gains popularity, and so on? Isn’t this backing themselves into a financial corner in the long run for some quick cash now?

by 

















