/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/14600869/20120718_lbm_ab9_405.0.jpg)
In the first post on this subject we looked at how MLS looked - from a statistical perspective - compared to the major European leagues (La Liga, Ligue 1, EPL, Bundesliga, Seria A). Of course, that analysis is not necessarily useful as it was taking league averages from approximately 20 teams per each league of varying quality. Also, it is very debatable how informative statistics like shots per game and even passes per game really are. That said, if taken with a grain of salt, there is certainly knowledge to be gleaned.
This post will look at how MLS teams compare to one another. Additionally, the rank next to each metric reflects that MLS team's rank compared to all 117 teams that comprise the five European leagues (in addition to MLS). Note: these statistics do not take into account the games played over the weekend of June 15/16. Also, long ball %, short pass %, and cross % are represented as % of total passes. The % may not total to 100% exactly because I excluded "through balls" from this analysis as they were insignificant.
Team | Shots pg | r | Shots OT pg | r | Shots conceded pg | r | Possession% | r |
CD Chivas USA | 10.2 | 109 | 3.5 | 104 | 15.9 | 111 | 47.5 | 78 |
Chicago Fire | 12.6 | 62 | 4.1 | 69 | 12.6 | 50 | 44.5 | 105 |
Colorado Rapids | 12.6 | 60 | 3.7 | 93 | 12 | 37 | 49.2 | 60 |
Columbus Crew | 13.7 | 35 | 4.8 | 35 | 11.8 | 31 | 48.9 | 63 |
DC United | 9.8 | 114 | 2.8 | 117 | 14.4 | 93 | 50.8 | 46 |
FC Dallas | 11.9 | 79 | 4.9 | 28 | 12.4 | 46 | 47.1 | 82 |
Houston Dynamo | 12.6 | 61 | 4.1 | 67 | 12.9 | 58 | 49.6 | 55 |
L.A. Galaxy | 13.8 | 33 | 4.9 | 32 | 9.8 | 8 | 52.5 | 37 |
Montreal Impact | 12.1 | 73 | 5.1 | 25 | 15.7 | 106 | 48.4 | 70 |
New England Rev. | 9.9 | 113 | 3.5 | 105 | 12.7 | 52 | 45.5 | 98 |
New York Red Bulls | 12.6 | 59 | 4.1 | 70 | 12.4 | 45 | 51.4 | 44 |
Philadelphia Union | 12.9 | 52 | 4 | 79 | 12.8 | 56 | 48.4 | 69 |
Portland Timbers | 14.4 | 26 | 5.2 | 21 | 11.8 | 29 | 57.1 | 11 |
Real Salt Lake | 14.7 | 19 | 5.9 | 12 | 12.3 | 44 | 57.3 | 9 |
San Jose Earthquakes | 13.5 | 40 | 4.2 | 64 | 11.3 | 24 | 48.9 | 64 |
Seattle Sounders FC | 11.2 | 89 | 3.8 | 88 | 13.8 | 78 | 51 | 45 |
Sporting Kansas City | 14.6 | 22 | 4.4 | 51 | 8.5 | 2 | 56.1 | 16 |
Toronto FC | 9.8 | 115 | 3.2 | 110 | 12.5 | 49 | 47 | 84 |
Vancouver Whitecaps | 13.7 | 34 | 4.8 | 37 | 13.3 | 67 | 47.1 | 81 |
Team | Open Play Goals % | r | Pass Success% | r | Cross % | r | Long Balls % | r | Short Passes % | r |
CD Chivas USA | 76.9% | 13 | 71.6 | 112 | 5.1% | 37 | 16.4% | 25 | 78.0% | 96 |
Chicago Fire | 66.7% | 56 | 73.1 | 106 | 5.4% | 27 | 13.9% | 71 | 80.2% | 55 |
Colorado Rapids | 53.3% | 104 | 75.0 | 91 | 4.4% | 81 | 16.5% | 20 | 78.8% | 89 |
Columbus Crew | 53.8% | 99 | 74.0 | 100 | 3.9% | 105 | 16.6% | 17 | 78.5% | 92 |
DC United | 50.0% | 110 | 75.9 | 84 | 4.8% | 57 | 16.4% | 26 | 78.3% | 94 |
FC Dallas | 47.8% | 112 | 74.7 | 95 | 5.1% | 39 | 16.8% | 14 | 77.3% | 103 |
Houston Dynamo | 70.6% | 39 | 74.3 | 97 | 5.0% | 44 | 14.9% | 50 | 79.9% | 64 |
L.A. Galaxy | 61.9% | 79 | 77.0 | 77 | 5.4% | 28 | 14.9% | 48 | 79.0% | 84 |
Montreal Impact | 72.7% | 32 | 78.1 | 61 | 3.1% | 116 | 14.4% | 62 | 81.3% | 36 |
New England Rev. | 80.0% | 7 | 73.7 | 102 | 3.3% | 112 | 15.6% | 38 | 80.5% | 48 |
New York Red Bulls | 65.2% | 63 | 78.6 | 50 | 4.5% | 79 | 12.5% | 94 | 82.4% | 23 |
Philadelphia Union | 52.6% | 105 | 75.8 | 88 | 5.0% | 41 | 14.5% | 58 | 79.7% | 68 |
Portland Timbers | 68.2% | 50 | 80.0 | 33 | 4.6% | 70 | 12.0% | 101 | 82.8% | 18 |
Real Salt Lake | 78.9% | 8 | 79.8 | 35 | 3.3% | 113 | 12.3% | 97 | 84.0% | 10 |
San Jose Earthquakes | 69.2% | 46 | 72.3 | 111 | 6.7% | 3 | 17.1% | 10 | 75.9% | 112 |
Seattle Sounders FC | 77.8% | 12 | 77.6 | 71 | 4.3% | 88 | 13.6% | 77 | 81.3% | 35 |
Sporting Kansas City | 50.0% | 109 | 77.7 | 67 | 4.7% | 64 | 15.9% | 33 | 79.3% | 76 |
Toronto FC | 66.7% | 55 | 72.4 | 109 | 4.9% | 48 | 17.6% | 5 | 77.3% | 104 |
Vancouver Whitecaps | 81.3% | 4 | 78.2 | 58 | 4.8% | 54 | 15.7% | 35 | 79.0% | 83 |
Team | Aerials Won pg | r | Dribbles pg | r | Fouled pg | r | Offsides pg | r | Tackles pg | r | Interceptions pg | r | Fouls pg | r |
CD Chivas USA | 14.8 | 83 | 7.2 | 62 | 11.7 | 86 | 1.9 | 103 | 18 | 107 | 22.9 | 16 | 15 | 40 |
Chicago Fire | 16.4 | 51 | 8 | 51 | 11.1 | 97 | 2.7 | 49 | 20.3 | 64 | 24.8 | 11 | 11.3 | 102 |
Colorado Rapids | 20.6 | 7 | 6.4 | 78 | 11.7 | 88 | 2.6 | 54 | 19.6 | 76 | 20.3 | 27 | 13.1 | 72 |
Columbus Crew | 19.5 | 15 | 5.2 | 104 | 12.8 | 67 | 2.1 | 93 | 20.5 | 61 | 28.3 | 5 | 12.8 | 79 |
DC United | 14.6 | 86 | 6.1 | 86 | 11.5 | 92 | 3 | 24 | 20.1 | 67 | 26.2 | 7 | 10.3 | 114 |
FC Dallas | 16.9 | 42 | 7.1 | 64 | 13.4 | 50 | 2.6 | 52 | 17.9 | 110 | 25.3 | 10 | 11.5 | 97 |
Houston Dynamo | 18.9 | 20 | 5.2 | 107 | 10.3 | 109 | 1.9 | 106 | 19.7 | 73 | 23.1 | 14 | 11.5 | 98 |
L.A. Galaxy | 13.4 | 102 | 5.8 | 91 | 12.5 | 70 | 1.5 | 117 | 18.8 | 97 | 22.4 | 17 | 11.8 | 94 |
Montreal Impact | 12.8 | 109 | 8.1 | 45 | 12.3 | 75 | 4.1 | 2 | 18.8 | 95 | 27.1 | 6 | 10.5 | 111 |
New England Rev. | 14.0 | 94 | 8.2 | 42 | 11.8 | 85 | 2 | 99 | 19.1 | 90 | 29.6 | 2 | 13.2 | 71 |
New York Red Bulls | 16.1 | 56 | 7.1 | 66 | 9.2 | 116 | 3.4 | 13 | 19.9 | 72 | 24.3 | 12 | 12.9 | 76 |
Philadelphia Union | 12.1 | 114 | 7.7 | 57 | 11.0 | 99 | 1.9 | 104 | 20.3 | 63 | 25.4 | 9 | 13.8 | 58 |
Portland Timbers | 19.8 | 10 | 7.6 | 58 | 12.0 | 81 | 3.4 | 11 | 20.3 | 65 | 23 | 15 | 12.4 | 83 |
Real Salt Lake | 13.2 | 105 | 5.7 | 95 | 10.6 | 105 | 1.8 | 112 | 19.7 | 74 | 23.9 | 13 | 11.3 | 103 |
San Jose Earthquakes | 24.1 | 3 | 6 | 87 | 11.6 | 91 | 2.5 | 64 | 21.5 | 46 | 25.5 | 8 | 11.9 | 91 |
Seattle Sounders FC | 19.8 | 11 | 8.5 | 37 | 12.1 | 77 | 3.3 | 17 | 22.6 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 12.6 | 82 |
Sporting Kansas City | 22.8 | 4 | 6.5 | 76 | 12.6 | 69 | 1.7 | 114 | 20.8 | 57 | 29.4 | 3 | 14.9 | 42 |
Toronto FC | 18.7 | 22 | 7 | 68 | 12.2 | 76 | 2 | 98 | 21.7 | 42 | 19.2 | 38 | 13.8 | 59 |
Vancouver Whitecaps | 15.2 | 75 | 8.4 | 39 | 11.1 | 96 | 1.8 | 111 | 16.8 | 115 | 28.5 | 4 | 11.8 | 93 |
I even found a European doppelganger for Seattle, based on a similarity score algorithm I ran: Torino.
Team | Possession% | Shots pg | Shots OT pg | Dribbles pg | Tackles pg | Cross % | Long Ball % | Short Pass % |
Seattle Sounders FC | 50.3 | 10.8 | 3.7 | 8.3 | 23.4 | 4% | 14% | 82% |
Torino | 49.6 | 11.3 | 3.8 | 8.1 | 23.7 | 4% | 14% | 82% |
Bonus: Updated Sounders Passing Chart (with pass distance)
POS | PLAYER | Minutes | Succ. Passes / 90 Min | Total Passes | Pass % | Avg Pass Distance (Meters) | Total Long Balls | Long Ball % Succ. | Pass Usage Rate / 90 minutes |
M | Alonso | 682 | 55 | 475 | 88% | 20 | 70 | 79% | 14.1% |
M | Joseph | 310 | 53 | 220 | 83% | 19 | 21 | 71% | 14.4% |
M | Rose | 532 | 34 | 255 | 79% | 18 | 19 | 47% | 9.7% |
M | Martinez | 470 | 32 | 215 | 79% | 20 | 24 | 58% | 9.3% |
M | Carrasco | 701 | 32 | 318 | 78% | 21 | 50 | 58% | 9.2% |
D | Gonzalez | 1062 | 32 | 516 | 72% | 21 | 65 | 32% | 9.8% |
M | Evans | 660 | 32 | 298 | 78% | 18 | 23 | 43% | 9.1% |
D | Scott | 462 | 31 | 209 | 76% | 23 | 41 | 71% | 9.1% |
D | Burch | 223 | 29 | 111 | 65% | 28 | 28 | 25% | 10.1% |
F | Zakuani | 468 | 28 | 174 | 84% | 15 | 11 | 73% | 7.5% |
D | Yedlin | 1169 | 27 | 458 | 78% | 19 | 40 | 35% | 7.9% |
D | Hurtado | 900 | 27 | 311 | 86% | 20 | 33 | 55% | 7.0% |
F | Estrada | 254 | 26 | 91 | 80% | 12 | 1 | 100% | 7.2% |
F | Johnson | 690 | 25 | 247 | 77% | 14 | 8 | 75% | 7.2% |
M | Caskey | 341 | 25 | 122 | 77% | 17 | 13 | 54% | 7.2% |
D | Traore | 1170 | 24 | 394 | 79% | 23 | 63 | 44% | 6.8% |
M | Rosales | 871 | 22 | 282 | 75% | 18 | 17 | 35% | 6.5% |
F | Martins | 546 | 22 | 168 | 79% | 14 | 10 | 90% | 6.2% |
F | Ochoa | 175 | 22 | 53 | 79% | 14 | 3 | 67% | 6.1% |
F | Neagle | 743 | 16 | 198 | 68% | 15 | 10 | 30% | 5.4% |
GK | Gspurning | 1170 | 10 | 225 | 58% | 41 | 145 | 39% | 3.9% |
Totals | 345 | 5340 | 78% | 20 | 695 | 50% |